Hello gentlemen,
I am aware that, over the course of the development of our Theory, the entire existence of Feminism, as well as what caused it, has been thoroughly accounted for in both Theory posts here on the forum, and from Theory writing from our resident philosophers.
However, I had not yet encountered a comprehensive breakdown of Feminism and it's purpose(s) on it's own in a single location, so I have taken it upon myself to construct such a piece mostly cobbled from outstanding work carried out before me, with perhaps some clarification for new readers.
So without further ado, let's begin.
Feminism is a perfect mix of two things: Shit Test, and Hamster
Hamster
Feminists are concerned with avoiding accountability for their mistakes by attempting to convince society that said mistakes aren't actually mistakes, and are the result of 'sexist' 'double-standards' and 'patriarchal constructs designed to frame perfectly fine actions for women to take as wrong'.
Thus, we have the Hamster. Rather than accept who they naturally are, and strive to fulfill the role they are biologically built to fulfill, they instead choose to try to deconstruct that which is natural so they don't have to be made accountable to and by us men who are aware of their natural role. Instead they invent the concept of the 'Patriarchy' to describe an unnatural originator for the natural standards they are held to by men. In an attempt to deflect responsibility. To calculatingly avoid her duty to keep herself undamaged and in good condition for a man in her life who it's her job to support and who's children it's her job to raise.
Feminists convince themselves it is the 'patriarchy' who hold them to these standards, instead of owning up to the fact that it's really just us men who expect them to fulfill their natural roles as women.
Unfortunately this Hamster has been largely successful in the West. 'Men' all over have become convinced by this red herring to the point where they abandon what's best for women and men alike, and indeed nature itself in favor of the idea that women are 'free to do what they want' and 'it's not up to men to decide what's best for women'.
These 'men' and their love of women's 'freedom' are what have led us to where we are today. A world where women feel perfectly comfortable doing what they want to do, and never once think to ask any man's permission or guidance. Covering for this by claiming to be rebelling against the non-existent 'patriarchy' so they can continue to do what they want without being accountable to men for their actions.
Make no mistake: This is the entire point of the demonization of men in the west. It is an attempt of the female to escape her feminine obligation to appreciate and follow the leadership of men in the name of rebelling against an imaginary overlord group of imaginary men.
As such, you may simply dismiss it as soon as you hear it. There is no reason to even allow these women to talk about these things for any length of time. It simply corrupts their minds further from the truth the more they are allowed to voice their fictitious theories.
This is equally true of the concepts of 'slut-shaming' and 'sexist double standards' in terms of careers and aspirations.
'slut shaming' is a concept she makes up to avoid being accountable for being a dirty slut. She simply wants to be a dirty, damaged slut with grossly diminished value, and thus wants to invent this idea that men 'slut shame' her. When instead, what's actually happening is we men are merely calling out sluts for being sluts.
'sexist double standards? Another favorite fiction of the Feminist to explain away all the ways she has betrayed her own nature and tried to be like a man. Tried to have a man's career, create a man's art, have a man's ideas.
Once again, she blames men with made up bullshit instead of accepting her natural role as woman.
Guys, never forget this. Seer it into your subconscious so you never forget it. *Women invent concepts that are intended to describe men as if they want to control and shame women, and hold them to a hypcritical double standard, in order to avoid having to be accountable to men, to avoid having to stop being a dirty, damaged slut, and to allow her to think she can do 'whatever a man can do'.
Shit Test
Feminists, like all women, secretly want to be dominated, in all aspects of their lives. By nature of their biology. That is how they are because they are women.
This is an inescapable fact of life. Women want to be dominated.
Most Western women, however, don't realize this, because they have been brainwashed by Feminism to believe they want to be 'free independent people with their own opinions and goals and dreams'.
So....women have thus repressed their true nature in an effort to adhere to this proponganda, but people are incapable of denying their nature for long, and the subconscious has a way of pushing it to the surface.
Introducing the Shit Test.
The Shit Test is a construct women create that is subconsciously (In other words, women will deny this. But, as shown, you cannot go by what women say. More on this in a bit) designed to seek out men who will dominate her, by employing it against guy after guy until a particular guy passes the test and thus shows he can dominate her.
Feminism is thus, in addition to being a Hamster, a Shit Test. In effect the Shit Test from which all the rest spring.
When women talk about the 'patriarchy', what they secretly desire is to be under a patriarchy. When they talk about 'slut shaming', it's because they secretly desire to be punished for being a slut. When they talk about 'sexist double standards' it's because they secretly hate the life of trying to be like a man, and long for feminine submission.
Thus, they will act like they are against all these things, in an effort to find a guy who finally says 'enough' and gives her everything she secretly desires.
The key thing about this is that only TRP men are able to discern this, because women won't admit it. They will vehemently deny they secretly want what they claim to be against. Even when they profess these things in bed* they will explain it away as 'BDSM' or 'Fantasy roleplay isn't the same as real life' or some other such bullshit as a last-second attempt to wiggle out of admitting the truth.
Feminism is a shit test. Download this ironclad scientific fact into the deepest recesses of your mind until it becomes a part of you.
Now for a couple of side points
#1
Any time a woman does or says anything that appears to contradict our Theory, they are lying. either to themselves, or to you, or both. Thus you must not listen to anything a woman says, ever.
#2
In the West, if a woman doesn't thoroughly lead her life by Theory principles, she's a de facto feminist, and you should understand her as such. She need not voice support for feminism, or voice any opinions feminists voice, but make no mistake: she is a feminist
How to protect yourself as a man
Be aware of women's tactics
Women are hypocritical, have cognitive dissonance, internally contradict themselves in the presentation of ideas, are entitled, selfish, lack self-awareness and fail to ever question the assumptions they hold.
They engage in elaborate mental gymnastics to avoid ever admitting they're wrong. They co-opt scientific constructs and phenomena, in order to pervert it and misrepresent it to artificially support their points. They write at nauseating length about all the ways men are conspiring against them, and about all the things that are supposedly 'wrong' with men, to avoid having to admit they are narcissistic, simple-minded, pretentious, misguided, overbearing, domineering, unpleasant, pseudo-intellectual tedious all-around unpleasant bitches who present 'ideas' which are unfalsifiable by design and are based on lies, deception and pre-supposed conclusions completely lacking in supportive evidence.
As Theory Men, only we are capable of understanding these things. So we must keep them in mind if we want to successfully keep our women in line, make sure they don't become dirty sluts, and keep them in their feminine roles in society.
Women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality, but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions ~ Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
ここには何もないようです