全 8 件のコメント

[–]DrMooseMMD1>4>3=NV>2 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're the director after the fact, at the end of the game. Father is still the director when he orders you to destroy the RR and BoS.

[–]TotesMessenger -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]Themasdogtoo -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Just shut up about it already for fucks sake, everyone has beat this dead horse until it is engraved in the pavement, we understand bethesda screwed up some with fo4, and so does bethesda; this was established a while ago. this is why far harbor was so great, multiple ways to end conflicts.

You become permanent enemies with ceasar's legion and NCR if you fail the two quests associated with them two, don't be biased.

[–]GabensInventory[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just shut up about it already for fucks sake, everyone has beat this dead horse until it is engraved in the pavement, we understand bethesda screwed up some with fo4, and so does bethesda; this was established a while ago.

I've avoided this sub and anything FO4-related like the plague, to not have spoilers ruin it for me. No need to be a dick about it.

You become permanent enemies with ceasar's legion and NCR if you fail the two quests associated with them two, don't be biased.

Sure, and the Legion's outlook is that is must dominate, not cooperate with anyone, which is why there is no way to peacefully resolve the conflict with them. This fits the plot perfectly.

So does the NCR's enemy status if you don't convince House that they can be negotiated with.

Of course I'm biased, NV was a far better game in terms of plot and role-play and I doubt any DLC will make up for the fuckup that FO4 is. I honestly don't think I'll spend another cent on content for it.

[–]sesom07 -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

The good old problem that players think when they get a rank in a faction that they are now the ultimate Dictator with unlimited power.

Regardless how much the game makes clear that they can't make the decisions for the faction alone.

[–]GabensInventory[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Then the game shouldn't make me Director at all.

In NV as a courier I had more sway over the NCR and the BoS than I do over the Institute as its chief. It makes no sense whatsoever.

If they'd made me Father's right-hand-man, then fine, I can sort of accept this plot line because that is a subservient role and it's implied that I must follow his orders. But if I'm the god-damned Director I expect to direct the Institute.

[–]sesom07 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah as Director of something you have no idea off and are coming in the first days you have the ultimate power. You are the allknowing suoperhero. I know. Gameplayer logic.

[–]GabensInventory[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You are the allknowing suoperhero. I know. Gameplayer logic.

Like I said, they shouldn't have made the role of Director in that case. It should have been a role like what the courier had with Mr House: a mere servant/aide.

If you side with the Institute, its implied that you're now its leader, regardless of how new you are there. The role of director implies that you command it.

It's not "gameplayer logic", it's what makes sense for that role in what is supposed to be a role-playing game.

If I wanted a plain shooter where I have no influence over the game's outcome then I'd have bought CoD.