•
•

Red Pill "Science"The slut/stud double standard revealed (self.TheBluePill)

Dat_Chad が 投稿

When a woman is promiscuous, she is slut-shamed by her peers. However when a man is so, he is lauded as an epitome of masculinity.

This is so unfair, I hear a chorus of SJWs bellowing. Double standard. Male privilege. A throwback to the Dark ages.

However, nothing could be further from the truth. Here is why.

In order to have many sexual partners, a woman has to simply have an inclination to do so. Never short of potential suitors, all she has to do is indiscriminately accept any old swinging dick that crosses her path. She might be a smoke show, she might be fat, she might be poor or short - she will get laid a lot if she so chooses.

Compare that to the man who gets around. The stakes are much higher for him. He has to approach, look good, spit game, have cash, command respect and check a whole hell of a lot of boxes in order to have his pick with a lot of women.

It is not easy to be a player, but it is very easy to be a slut. And that is the main difference. Not the patriarchy, not Trump and noth the MRAs.

Even women hate on sluts. Have they been brainwashed? Or do they innately know that the difference is in the effort that needs to be put in?

This wouldn't be complete if we left men out of the equation. Men's thirst for pussy is what enables these promiscuous women. They are, by and large, desperate and indiscriminating.

And that, kids, is how I met your mother.

全 8 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]saturnapartmentsLittle White Cuck Ball 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

buh buh lock and key comparison buhhhh woman have more sex than me :( :( :(

Are your tendies done yet?

[–]Dat_Chad[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

what are these tendies you keep speaking of, woman?

[–]Buckeye_Gus 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sounds sbout right.

[–]Sonic_BluthYouth Against Gender Fascism 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Think about it this way:

You say that it comes down to "effort," but imagine a man who puts no work into getting laid. He just goes to the bar to have a drink and women ask him if he wants to go back to their place and he says "sure."

Now imagine a woman who diets and exercises hardcore so she has a toned body, masters her makeup technique, puts hours and hours of upkeep into her hair, makes sure her closet is loaded with outfits that are both provocative and fashionable, and maybe even goes under the knife for breast enhancement. Then she goes out every night to try and meet a man.

Is the man still not a "stud"? Would you not call a woman who devoted that much time to attracting men a "slut"?

[–]Dat_Chad[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

The man you are describing exists, he is what we call a "natural". However even a natural has to approach if he is to have consistent results. No ifs and buts about it.

The woman in question is not going to be a slut. She ups her SMV in order to attract QUALITY, not quantity. She either looks for finacial security (what we call a golddigger) or the perfect soulmate, in which case she is truly a unicorn.

[–]SamuelEnderby 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Finally, the new perspective we've all been waiting for.

[–]PorgiAmorChad is my Copilot 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

When a woman is promiscuous, she is slut-shamed by her peers.

Not really. She's slut-shamed worse by online TRPs and MRAs.

Even women hate on sluts.

On the contrary, the most outspoken defenders of sluts nowadays are women, not men. Women organized and largely drive the "slutwalks".

[–]Birdsiscool 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Goddamnit, I read that whole thing waiting for the punchline, only to discover you're another jackass twerping troll. Joke's on me.

It's fucking hilarious that you think you're explaining your misogynist views in a novel way though.