あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Please_PM_me_Uranus [スコア非表示]  (32子コメント)

This will go down in history as one of the worst decisions the UK has made.

[–]Kimye2020 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Which given their history says a lot. But I agree with you. They wanted to reject the status quo (and maybe people with darker skin as well), but the consequences are huge. I just read a quote from someone in Labour, saying the British voted with their emotions. This will be an economic disaster- the pound has already dropped.

If anything this confirms the idea the American founding fathers had about the tyranny of the masses. Sometimes, most times, the people really don't know what's best for themselves. The whole 'tired of experts' line epitomizes this problem. Representative democracy works because the representatives are usually better informed and make better choices. A simple majority referendum should not be the kind of thing that shapes the course of British history.

[–]Magnetic_Eel [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It should never have been put up for a vote. Cameron needs to fall on his sword for letting this happen. The UK is in for a rough decade.

[–]Finalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What do you mean it should not have been put to a vote? Do you not believe in democracy?

This vote was announced in December 2015. There has been ample time for all sides to prepare.

What you are saying is the future of a country, should not have been decided by the citizens of that country.

Throw self governance out the window.

Even if it turns out poorly, this is what was decided. It is not a discussion if people should not have a say.

[–]thefatshoe [スコア非表示]  (28子コメント)

Based on what

[–]Loop_Within_A_Loop [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

have you seen the pound?

[–]thefatshoe [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It will normalize soon

[–]Loop_Within_A_Loop [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It will, but that's only becuase it cannot get worse.

If it normalizes from 10% to 8% down, that's still fucking horrendous.

[–]chromatik [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Brexiteers are deliberately vague about the alternatives to European Union membership. That is because most models, such as Iceland’s, are unsatisfactory ... So Brexiteers may hope instead for a bespoke deal for Britain that gives access to the single market without EU rules, free movement of people or budget contributions. But this is a delusion. The EU cannot be generous to a post-Brexit Britain for fear that others (including the EEA) might demand the same. ... It is hard not to conclude that, even if EU membership has unsatisfactory aspects, it beats all plausible alternatives. No wonder the markets are nervous about the result.

The Economist

[–]truenorth00 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

When we went through a Quebec referendum, the separatists pulled the same crap. Half of those voting for separation thought they could keep their Canadian passport and currency. The government of the day got a court ruling that said any future separation vote must have a clear question and with a clear majority. No 50% + 1 on a vague question. That's all but killed the drive for separation.

[–]OneDoesNotSimplyPass [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Nationalism is always the worst thing to happen to countries

[–]dickwhitman69 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Aye, but it looks like Scotland may be free and independent once more, and they will do the smart and pragmatic thing and join the E.U. if/when that happens.

[–]theragingsky [スコア非表示]  (20子コメント)

Every independent financial study done by leading economic authorities.

[–]Tweddlr [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I forgot that every decision has to align with economic authorities, the same ones that failed to spot the 2008 financial crisis and still cannot give a concrete answer for the lack of increase in median wages over the past 20 years.

[–]That_Justice [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The best decision is not always the most financially profitable.

[–]thefatshoe [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Care to link one so I can look at it?

[–]theragingsky [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This is a simple article from Bloomberg discussing Oxford Economics models for a Brexit. The study itself is behind a pay wall ATM, but we studied portions in my economics course at UK this year. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-21/-brexit-would-cause-significant-damage-oxford-economics-says