0
0

'Officials won't say what is going on' (inverse.com)

Gorkildeathgod が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Abram1769 -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

Well a question you have to consider is, what are those objects out there? How do you know they're spheres? Are planets physical objects or are they just lights in the sky? You can see that they're circles emitting light, but that really has no bearing on the thing you and I stand on. We're told that stars are giant nuclear reactors but it's not as if NASA flew up there and did physical tests to determine that. It's based on conjecture.

Some flat earth models postulate there is a dome or "firmament" above the earth that holds the sun, moon, and stars. That these things are simply luminaries that are a few thousand miles away rather than the light years mainstream science claims. In this case the earth is unique. A "plane" of existence while the sky and stars are placed above us. If NASA never made it to the moon and have been putting out false images, do you think they ever really made it to Mars or another "planet"? It's all up for speculation.

[–]Luke2179 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Thanks for the reply, appreciate it. I'm not going by what nasa or anyone has told me. Everything I look at with my own eyes is round. Here is a time lapse of Jupiter from the telescope I use. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M1In7rIKKfM Looks round and rotating to me, as does everything else I look at. I guess I would just have to be willing to believe that we are unique as you say and somehow our planet acts differently than everything else that exists. I like to keep an open mind and I like the idea of not just believing what we are told but it is very hard to find anything that allows me to have any confidence in even the possibility that we may be flat. Seems like a 1 in a billion chance to me.

[–]Abram1769 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

This may be getting a little deep down the rabbit hole, but I found this review for the Celestron Nexstar 11 (the telescope used according to the video description).

Goto accuracy and Tracking:

Once properly aligned, I’ve found that the N11 can place any selected object in the field of view of a 22mm Nagler (~125 power) 98% of the time, usually in the dead center. The need for realignments is rare, usually only once every four to five hours.

Equally impressive is the N11’s tracking ability. At a recent star party, I inadvertently left my N11 on the Whirlpool Galaxy (M51) for over three hours. When I returned, I was pleased to find Whirlpool still in the dead center of the eyepiece. The goto accuracy and tracking of the N11 is very accurate and is a definite high point.

If this telescope is tracking and knows the positions of these objects and where it's pointing, what would stop a manufacturer from pre-programming a certain image to be displayed when directed at a certain area of the sky? What if the deception was so deep that you couldn't trust anything digital? Please correct me if I'm wrong but this telescope doesn't seem to be wholly analog. It may sound crazy but I think it's crazy that a telescope company like Orion would make their logo a flat plane with a dome over it.

Truth, by its very nature, is exclusive. There are an infinite amount of wrong answers to any question. I'd encourage you to do your own research. I don't think there was any one thing that convinced me that the globe earth model was flawed. It was numerous issues and sources that have led me to believe the model simply isn't accurate. Explanations for tides, lunar eclipses, flight paths, satellites, ISS, and the dubious nature of some of the pioneers of the heliocentric model like Pythagoras, Galileo, and Newton. There's a lot of information out there on both sides but in the end you have to decide yourself.

[–]Luke2179 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yes the telescope has a computer so your theory could be possible. I have used telescopes that aren't computerized though. Good advice though, I'll keep researching as long as the subject interests me. Thanks for the replies.

[–]Abram1769 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Another user contacted me to inform that the display through the telescope is completely analog and the digital aspect only relates to the tracking and navigation. I still hold onto some doubt but full disclosure, it would seem your telescope is analog in regards to the image!