あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]lavenuma [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

I bet these anti-affirmative action people aren't as passionately anti-nepotism. I see the people at the top only hiring their colleagues friends and family. Can we have this much passion against this? And what about legacy kids that get into schools because their parents donated a bucket ton of money to that university? Why don't I see court cases against these practices in the news?

[–]Will_Parent [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I am against both discrimination based on skin color and nepotism. I would think most educated people would be.

[–]belisaurius [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Then you should be for laws that redress already existing institutional discrimination as that allows for a world where everyone regardless of race, creed, gender, etc has equal opportunity. Any educated person should understand that.

[–]Will_Parent [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Of course I am. I think discriminating against someone based on their race should be illegal. That is why we need to get rid of affirmative action laws that do just that. I am glad you agree that we need to make a law against affirmative action so that we can...

redress already existing institutional discrimination as that allows for a world where everyone regardless of race, creed, gender, etc has equal opportunity.

[–]gassygooselover [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If I could see any hard numbers on that discrimination I'd consider it. All I see is "groups A, B, and C don't seem to be doing well, must be white men's fault."

[–]mensol_zero [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The civil rights act only protects certain categories, it doesn't require that every admissions and advancement system be a meritocracy. Employers can fire someone for being ugly if they want.

[–]lolnopound [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I see the people at the top only hiring their colleagues friends and family. Can we have this much passion against this?

TIL not being a family member is a protected class. Have a link to that?