(cache) lavenumaがSupreme Court Upholds Affirmative Action Program at University of Texasについて記入したコメント


Be civil	Treat others with basic decency. No personal attacks, hate-speech, flaming, baiting, trolling, witch-hunting, or unsubstantiated accusations. Threats of violence will result in a ban. More Info.
Do not post users' personal information.	Users who violate this rule will be banned on sight. Witch-hunting and giving out private personal details of other people can result in unexpected and potentially serious consequences for the individual targeted. More Info.
Vote based on quality, not opinion.	Political discussion requires varied opinions. Well written and interesting content can be worthwhile, even if you disagree with it. Downvote only if you think a comment/post does not contribute to the thread it is posted in or if it is off-topic in /r/politics. More Info.
Do not manipulate comments and posts via group voting.	Manipulating comments and posts via group voting is against reddit TOS. More Info.


Articles must deal explicitly with US politics.	See our on-topic statement here.
Articles must be published within the last 31 days.	More Info.
Post titles must be exact headline or exact quote.	Your headline must be comprised only of the copied and pasted headline of the article, a continuous quote taken from the article, or both the headline and a continuous quote taken from the article. If using a quote, it should reflect the article as a whole. More Info.
Submissions must be an original source.	An article must contain significant analysis and original content--not just a few links of text among chunks of copy and pasted material. Content is considered rehosted when a publication takes the majority of their content from another website and reposts it in order to get the traffic and collect ad revenue. More Info.
Spam is bad!	If 33% or more of your submissions are from a single website, you will be banned as a spammer. More Info.
Submissions must be articles, videos or sound clips.	We disallow solicitation of users (petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.), personal blogs, satire, images, social media content (Facebook, twitter, tumblr, LinkedIn, etc.), wikis, memes, and political advertisements. More info: Content type rules.
Do not use "BREAKING" or ALL CAPS in titles.	The ALL CAPS and 'Breaking' rule is applied even when the actual title of the article is in all caps or contains the word 'Breaking'. This rule may be applied to other single word declarative and/or sensational expressions, such as 'EXCLUSIVE:' or 'HOT:'. More Info.

•

Supreme Court Upholds Affirmative Action Program at University of Texas (nytimes.com)

ecce-homo が 1時間前投稿

トップ新着論争中古い順 Q&A

あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]lavenuma [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (48子コメント)

[–]iamsmilebot [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (0子コメント)

[–]Newtwo88 [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (41子コメント)

[–]WelcomeToBoshwitz [スコア非表示] 56分前 (3子コメント)

[–]soxandpatriots1 [スコア非表示] 49分前 (0子コメント)

[–]lavenuma [スコア非表示] 19分前 (0子コメント)

[–]fauxgnaws [スコア非表示] 1分前 (0子コメント)

But you're missing the point. AA is about, in part, creating a strong middle class for each minority group in this country. We're much closer to having that than black communities or latino communities.

The point is that you can do this without racism. Use a means test and when there are huge numbers of poor blacks, then they disproportionately benefit. Add in "single-family home" and other tests like these and you can boost it to target blacks even more -- without being based on race, without being racist.

And at the same time, the children of rich doctors and lawyers and scientists don't get an extra benefit because they happen to be a certain race.

Any affirmative action policy should be self-regulating like that. We shouldn't have policies that have to be monitored for the point when they stop being more anti-racist than they are racist.