全 4 件のコメント

[–]MaterialMaverick 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think those drunk slags know what they're getting themselves into. They just want the plausible deniability that comes with being drunk.

The better comparison is with those men who take women on expensive dates expecting sex while shaming those who just pay for pussy directly.

[–]WellDone321[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You still get that beer goggle effect though. That's my point. Booze blurs all those rough edges on someone's persona.

[–]dalef77 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

In modern gynocentric society, men are taught that they have to win a woman's love, affection, and attention. If a man pays for sex, he is short-circuiting this gynocentric practice of placing women on pedestals.

Our society shames men who do not believe in the "Women are Wonderful" effect - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect . Paying a woman for sex remove the "specialness" of women and reduces sex with a woman to a simple act of commerce.

The overall cost of using a prostitute or escort is usually less than the expense of a wife or girlfriend. As most consumer spending is conducted by women, with many of these women using male-earned resources, if many men could be satisfied with an inexpensive, short-term relationship instead of a long-term relationship or marriage, there would be less opportunities for women to spend as prolifically as they do now. If women spent less, many corporations would have less profit.

We cannot have that, can we now?

[–]WellDone321[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man, excellent response. Thanks for the link.