4764
4765

Found it. (imgur.com)

Enhelpr が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]gollumsvillainy 55ポイント56ポイント  (122子コメント)

Anyone else bothered by the angle of the butt?

[–]-Npie 328ポイント329ポイント  (121子コメント)

It's actually an achievable pose.

[–]raitono 33ポイント34ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dear God. I was not expecting the raw dong below that post.

[–]netsrak 22ポイント23ポイント  (68子コメント)

That link is dead for me.

[–]-Npie 13ポイント14ポイント  (67子コメント)

Sorry, I fixed it.

[–]strenif 1ポイント2ポイント  (66子コメント)

Wow, why is that not on the front page of something. The world needs to see this.

[–]zykezero 16ポイント17ポイント  (65子コメント)

Why does the "world need to see this". It's figure drawing.

People mostly take issue with covers like this, and this.

It's not that boob and butt stances aren't impossible, but that they are used more frequently than not. Enter; Hawkeye initiative

[–]IAmJeremyRush 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

That Spiderwoman cover is a reference to an older Spiderman cover, but yes.

[–]AlaskanWolf 18ポイント19ポイント  (3子コメント)

The Maddox video about that spider woman pose is something everyone who takes issue with that piece of artwork should watch.

[–]strenif 24ポイント25ポイント  (2子コメント)

You mean this one?

[–]AlaskanWolf 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's the one.

[–]Fincow 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not sure why anyone should watch that video. If the guy can't tell the difference between terrible proportions on the female version to make the ass look huge as opposed to a fairly regular butt on the male version, then hes not overly intelligent and not worth watching.

[–]strenif 43ポイント44ポイント  (43子コメント)

Oh my god how awful. You'd never see spider man drawn like that.

Hmm

The only way it could be worse is if they drew her in that skin tight costum with her legs spread wide over and over and over

[–]Naf5000 12ポイント13ポイント  (8子コメント)

The point isn't that it's a woman being sexualized, the point is that the anatomy of the drawings is terrible. Look at Spiderwoman's neck in the first one; It must be about eight inches long and her head is bent almost back on her spine. She looks like a Dr. Who monster. The second image is literally covered in notes about how anatomy doesn't work like that, I'm not sure how you even decided it was about her sex.

[–]strenif 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm not sure how you even decided it was about her sex

Hmm how ever did I come to that conclusion...

http://time.com/3153866/spider-woman-marvel-comic-butt/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/22/spiderwoman-male-female-superheroes-sexism_n_5698337.html

http://time.com/3594514/marvel-spider-woman-cover/

http://www.dailydot.com/geek/marvel-prints-milo-manara-spider-woman-cover/

One wonders.

[–]Naf5000 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I was talking specifically about the second picture. The first one I can understand, because it's pretty much just a picture of a woman that /u/zykezero says is objectionable, but the second one is literally covered in notes about what's wrong with it and none of them mention her sex except to note that her breasts are misaligned on her torso.

[–]mysticrudnin 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

but

they're spiderpeople

[–]Naf5000 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Spiders don't have long flexible necks. Spiders don't even have regular necks!

[–]Groincobbler 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

There were well publicized complaints about that cover being too sexualized in the past, with specific attention to how male characters would never be drawn like that.

You were very much not bringing that up, of course. But it's possible the dude just saw that picture, and some sort of complaint about it, and assumed that's what you were on about without looking too close. Doesn't make that right, but hey, it's something.

[–]wyratt14 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Stop with your logic, we're being offended here!

[–]Reinhart3 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

I mean, it's fine if you don't like comic books and don't have much knowledge of them, but if that's the case you probably shouldn't make really stupid generalizations like "This would never happen with a male!" when you've probably only seen 5 comic book covers before.

[–]ryantucker1986 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Did you miss the sarcasm? Look at the links he posted

[–]Reinhart3 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I was saying in general, not specifically towards him.

[–]PresidentRex 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Creepiest part of spiderman is how his abs essentially go all the way to his chin.

[–]strenif 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Are you suggesting they are drawing spiderman with an unrealistic and unobtainable body?

[–]PresidentRex 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why can't Big Comic draw a normative superhero that doesn't try to force an unachievable metric on us? A good, wholesome representative of modern America. Like the Blob or the Blimp.

[–]Ball-Blam-Burglerber 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Peter must tuck it like RuPaul.

[–]StarMagnus 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

You do realize there's a difference between sexually suggestive poses and ones that are physically impossible for a human to achieve?

[–]GoghGirl 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the emphasis on both images is different. Images are made up of lines that will direct your gaze over it. Its actually pretty interesting how you can make the image seem more dynamic. But in spiderwomans case the color/contrast and most of the lines lead up right to her butt.

I thought this Extra Credits about character design/pose was very interesting. https://youtu.be/ZmLkVtqjf1A?t=137

http://vanseodesign.com/web-design/direct-the-eye/

[–]wyratt14 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is there an inverse Hawkeye initiative, to draw female characters in the poses of male characters? Because there are some pretty fucking revealing poses for male characters

[–]zykezero 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yea it's called normal comic book poses.

[–]wyratt14 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've never seen a woman drawn like this or like this or like this or like this. And if they were people would flip shit about it being "sexualized."

[–]topdangle 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Black widow looks like she's two separate bodies joined at the belt.

[–]zykezero 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's her super power at this point.

[–]browwiw 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The "people" who take issue with this are professional umbrage takers.

[–]Piroca22 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Those cover look terrible because they are poorly made, not only because of the poses.

[–]BoxOfDust 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

They seem achieveable anyways, but that link is really interesting nonetheless.

[–]yosayoran 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Especially the dude when you scroll down a bit ;-)

[–]Sinidir 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think i found my new fetish.

[–]negajake 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Boo ya

[–]Freezman13 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Useless but none the less intriguing crap is why I love the internet. Prime example.

Someone took the time out of their day to do this :D

[–]flergnerg 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

as someone who is practicing anatomy for art this is certainly not useless to me, going strait to my reference folder.