My general reaction to these discussions in the wake of my nation's reaction to the recent tragedy in Orlando is that I think it's amazing that we can apparently talk with ease about passages in the Bible which can be used to justify homophobia, violence and murder as the Christians' god's "judgment," and yet for some reason people seem to want to use the Quran as textual evidence of Islam's supposedly inherent homophobic violence and then further use that "evidenced" homophobia as a justification to deport Muslims from the United States. Few people who are familiar with the actual words of the Quran and the Bible both would deign to judge the Quran as inherently more violent or homophobic, but that's the common conclusion of so many misguided armchair theologians (although, somewhat to the credit of the linked thread's OP, there is little mention of such things). The Quran mentions Jesus by name more frequently than the Bible does, and indeed many worshipers throughout history have cited the Quran's resemblance to the Bible as proof of its divinity. Consider the role of violence in the history of both of these two faiths, and it becomes apparent that single-minded persecution of Islam or Muslims undermines the pursuit of the real issue at hand (ex: geographic problems resulting from the Treaty of Versailles, and further western involvement in armed Middle-Eastern conflict, wide cultural barriers, plus other reasons).

As for the thread in question, creating commentaries on "judgment" begs the question, "For what are these victims being judged?" That assumes we are talking about the victims, but that does seem to be the context of this thread. The one thing all the victims seem to have in common is that they were assumed LGBT/GSM people, which then creates the quite apparent connection of:

LGBT/GSM person in life = judged after death

and that hardly seems fair. That's homophobia and bigotry, no matter how many polite religious disguises it dons.