あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]TenDeadlyVenoms 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

As opposed to what? The lifeless and barren spaces of Bethesda open worlds? The cities filled with 20 people? The piles of useless junk you can pick up? There is no town in a Bethesda game that feels as alive or detailed as novigrad. There's no country side filled with farmers and beekeepers etc.... Bethesda open world is empty, littered with useless junk, and poor quests. It's an ocean with the depth of a puddle. We don't even need W3 to compare it too. Look at what Obsidian did with New Vegas. It's far and away a much better open world rpg experience than anything Bethesda has put out in the last decade.

[–]WilhelmScreams 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fallout 4 is littered with things much more interesting than beekeepers, not to mention the random encounters you can have in the world. If you're going to just fanboy out here and ignore what Bethesda games do right, you're just as bad as those you try to mock earlier.

[–]TenDeadlyVenoms 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

W3 has plenty of random encounters and things to discover in the world. And again, Fallout New Vegas is a great example of what a good Bethesda game should look like. Obisidian made a better Bethesda game than the real Bethesda. Skyrim is bland paste and fallout 4 is a joke.