uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

that tolerating hate speech dilutes intelligent debate.

No one has yet to define hate speech. It's just a loose concept that is always used to censor opinions. Do you consider it hate speech when someone points out that the majority of the US prison population is black? Do you consider it hate speech when someone states that the average IQ among blacks is well below that of whites? Both are facts yet censored almost everywhere on reddit.

In journalism

If there is one profession that should be very quiet when it comes to what should and shouldn't be allowed it's journalists. They've ruined their own reputation by pushing an agenda rather than conveying the news.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice idea. I think we could figure out some filter thingy. What do you thing /u/g_petronius is this doable?

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

for non-English sources would be allowing the use of the text "

I don't know if I'm misunderstanding you or not but we already allow non english content as long as a translation is provided.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク General Announcement

[–]RamblinRambo3[S,M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

This comment of yours falls under what reddit considers calls for a brigade. I'll have to remove it.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Self-posts are allowed though right?

Yes. As long as it's news.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

The way we did it in /r/european was that we'd delete the duplicate and let OP know. Could be an option here as well. It is however extremely rare that two identical submissions would reach the front.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Politics ok to post too?

If it's from a news source yes.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

The community is capable to moderate itself when it comes to this. Shit sources will be downvoted. No need for us to do anything about it.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク About the Modteam and a honest response to where we stand.

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

We don't intend to meddle in what way people express themselves. Be it factual or not.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク Rule input from our subscribers

[–]RamblinRambo3[S,M] 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

The rules say news. We don't care what country they're concerned with.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク About the Modteam and a honest response to where we stand.

[–]RamblinRambo3[S,M] 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

what do you plan to do when the ADMINS demand you make the same edits the mods at /r/news did?

Ask them to fuck off and go suck on a pulsating one.

subredditcancer 内の sloth_on_meth によるリンク All comments removed in /r/news

[–]RamblinRambo3 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They thought they could kill free speech. So did the admins. /r/european is basically back with 2 times the subscribers :D HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク About the Modteam and a honest response to where we stand.

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

So you will censor left leaning articles?

Read what we've just said. The answer to your question is there in plain text.

uncensorednews 内の RamblinRambo3 によるリンク About the Modteam and a honest response to where we stand.

[–]RamblinRambo3[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Once the dust settles a bit we'll have a look at the rules and see what can be improved. Such as limiting news to at least a few days old stuff. Can't really call a few months old stuff news.