Take Heart, Berner
My warmest greetings to you, my brothers, sisters, & others — I hope that you are all in good enough spirits, though I know that the media has been hard on you, lately. You’ll be happy to know that I come bearing good news…
It’s been a few days since I’ve written to you in a full article & this is because so much has been happening that I could scarcely write about any number without that number changing. Now, with the assistance of the People’s Math Front (& even some new volunteers), I think that I’ve got my grasp on the situation, again. Let’s dig in, shall we?
I’m sure that many of you are wondering…
What the heck is going on in California?!
Well, I’m glad that you’ve asked! Because it just so happens that I’ve spent every waking hour for the last several days investigating that very question — here’s what we know:
- The situation is very confusing, right now — this is mostly because the media decided to go into full-on voter-suppression mode by fraudulently announcing the “democratic nominee” right before the last big primary day of the season! Needless to say, this made a lot of people very mad…
- There are still a lot of votes being counted! I cannot stress this point enough & I will go into this in detail, in a moment — be patient!
- The Lame-Stream-Media — especially, the Associated Press — is lying to you. My friends, even I was (& am) shocked by the extent of their treachery — of course, you all know that I’ve been no friend to many “news” outlets for a long time but this –! Even I never suspected that they would stoop this low…
- We can still win. The rules — no, no, the game itself — has changed drastically since June 7th but there is still a way forward. The liars will say that there isn’t but there is! Let me explain…
Lie #1: Clinton has won California
According to the California Secretary of State’s own current estimates, there are at least about 2.6 million ballots that have yet to be counted! To put this in perspective, Clinton only has about 1.9 million votes & Sanders only has about 1.5! Together, (& excluding write-ins, etc.), that means that the votes that have been counted so far are about 3.4 million — and there are, at the very least, 2.6 million left to count!
So, I guess what the treacherous AP meant to say was…
3.4m + 2.6m = 6m
3.4 ÷ 6m = 0.56.66…
What the AP meant to say was 56.6% counted, not 100% counted! Silly AP — don’t be too hard on them, folks, as I’m sure that it’s really easy to make these kinds of mistakes, ya know? I mean, they’re just a giant federation of billion-dollar media corporations and they’re under a lot of pressure & all that — I mean, who cares? 56.6% or 100%, what’s the difference, right? Am I right? Am I, uh… ri — uh… hm.
You know, now that I think about it… maybe that’s not such an easy mistake to make, after all! I mean, theoretically speaking, if you strongly suspect that there might be even 1 — one single vote — out there, shouldn’t the percentage reporting be, at least, oh I don’t know — maybe 99.9999999…%, or something?
How could they have possibly thought that it was a good idea to tell every news organization in the United States that every single precinct, in every single county in all of California was “100%?”
I’ll just leave that question hanging in the air, right there.
Lie #2: Hillary Clinton is now the “democratic nominee”
I wish that I could somehow explain to you all how friggin’ miffed I am that I still have to explain this one to the internet, after all these months — super-delegates do not vote until the national convention on July 25th. Period.
So, taking away super-delegates, the “totals” are:
Clinton: 2,202
Sanders: 1,809
Which — even with the fraudulent, soon to be YUGELY different California delegate-allocation — is still short of the 2,383 delegates needed to clinch the democratic nomination. So, even with all their despicable cheating, they’ve still fallen short of actually clinching the nomination.
But you wouldn’t know that from watching TV.
So, uh, what do we do, now?
This is the tricky part! And I will write to you all very, very soon about this but it’s such a big thing that it’s going to have to be a two-part article or something silly like that. I wanted to get this article out as soon as possible, though, because I just can’t stand seeing the media lie to you all like this! I will say this, though: the whole game has changed, now.
After what they — the C/inton-Machine, the corporate-media, & the democratic party, I mean — after what they did on the June 7th primaries, we’re going to have to change our strategies a little bit (& by “change our strategies a little bit,” I mean completely transform our approach).
Now, after this article, you should all understand the following two things:
- The Battle for California is not over, the media is lying to you — indeed, it has only just begun.
- Clinton has not clinched the nomination — the media is lying to you. Just as I’ve said from the start — there will be a contested convention on July 25th and the only thing that’s changed is how stupid they’re all going to look when we win.
I’ll be dropping two more articles, tomorrow — one with the final results from the Oregon primary & another on our path forward. In the meantime, all of you should investigate #ExitPollGate & keep it trending, along with #StillSanders, #OnlyBernie, & any other positive ones (seriously, investigate it…) — I also ask that you share, re-tweet, & post this article on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, & everywhere else that you can think of. A lot of people are very discouraged, right now — and that’s bad. Do something about it! Our enemies are trying to destroy our momentum, our enthusiasm, & our will to move forward — do not let them!
I know it might sound strange but we are much, much closer to victory than you know — it just doesn’t seem like it, right now. I’ll say a lot more, tomorrow!
I must away, my friends — please, spread this knowledge & try not to be too angry (that’s what our enemies want!). Stay cool, keep calm, learn stuff, and — above all — keep your head up😉
In solidarity,
John Laurits #SeeYouInPhilly
Follow @JohnLaurits
P.S. If you haven’t already, please check out the last article, Why I will #SeeYouInPhilly, it’s important — there’s also this new page (where I’m posting less-than-article rolling important updates, calls to action, & informative memes)’
*You can follow John on Twitter @JohnLaurits. And, if ye’d like, you can also help out by buying John coffee HERE, which he is always very grateful for.
**A special thanks to the fabulous Jacob Yona for his image-craft — if you like art (and who doesn’t like art?!), you should check out his website!
Man, I love reading your post. Thank you for all of your hard work John!
LikeLiked by 4 people
John,
Can you do us a favor and try to share this with Bernie please?
I fear that even the energizer bunny would be at an all time low after all that has come to pass, I don’t know how Bernie does it. He might appreciate your positivity too. I know I do.
Thank you for your continued support and efforts.
Sincerely,
Rick Cribbins
LikeLiked by 6 people
I’ll give it a shot — seems like he’d be a hard person to get a hold of… I’ll tweet it at him, I s’ppose — thanks for the suggestion😉
LikeLiked by 7 people
I think Bernie probably knows. He made the statement at the WH PR that we will wait on CA full vote count which will reduce the difference quite a bit. He did not say he would probably win (wise move), since that was not necessary at the time as it would have only stirred more aggression towards him, but I suspect he knows that actually he has a real change to win CA, perhaps even by a landslide. The key now is for all agencies and volunteers to assist the process (take this as a CALL to ACTION!) of counting these remaining votes and not let the Clinton machinery interfere with the process. All forces should be to protect the count and the moral of the movement. Remember the final battle in Ender’s Game ? when Andrew commanded all the sentinel vessels to create as shield around the main ship so that it can recharge and fire? That is the kind of effort that is now required around these final waves of tying up loose ends so we can get to the point to FIRE. There is a barrage of attacks on ALL fronts coming at us via MSM, via the corrupt surrogate politicians disguised as Bernie supporters and from Obama’s endorsement and support which will unfold and amplify moving forward. We can create that shield around Bernie and carry him closer to the target. Synchronize add Stay Focused! Do not lend your energy to any deceitful recipients!
LikeLiked by 2 people
John, in 2008 did Obama reach the “magic number” with pledged delegates? No. Why is this year different than in 2008? If anything Hillary has a larger pledged and super delegate lead than Obama had in 2008 yet everyone called the race for him too right after he got to the number with pledged+supers. And before anyone says Bernie hasn’t dropped out yet, Hillary didn’t drop out until 4 days after all the networks called the Primary for Obama.
As for the Cali Primary, it’s funny you don’t mention that 1.8 million of those votes are mail in ballots which Hillary won by a wide margin. The media calls races all the time at 50-60% of the count. It’s called a projected winner, and with most of the outstanding vote being mail in ballots, it’s pretty easy to see why they would call it for Hillary.
LikeLike
Most of the last minute mail in votes in California are new or younger Sanders voters, many of whom were waiting on crossover democratic ballots to be mailed to them.
LikeLike
You’re seem to be laboring under the delusion that there’s no demographic difference between early & day-of voters — if you do some research, I assure you that you’ll find that these differences are both significant & well-documented. If you don’t believe me, see the articles that I’ve done that broke down & analyzed the county data of voting-day ballots that weren’t yet accounted for in Oregon. If you compare my numerous predictions to the results, you’ll find that I was correct. I was correct because I accounted for the millenial-heavy vote share of late voters (sanders won about 70% of the later ballots, compared to perhaps 60-ish overall). Thanks for taking the time to comment
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do understand that there is a demographic difference between early and late mail in voters, but “in person day of” votes split about 50-50 in Cali. Would late mail in ballots beat “in person day of” votes? Many other states were called with about 50-60% of the vote totals. She’s up 12% and I see no problems with networks calling the Cali race for her, it might tighten but not enough to effect the result.
Also you did not answer my question about how this year differs from 2008? They called the race for Obama right when he had enough Pledged+Supers to past the half way mark. The exact same thing happened this year. Hillary’s lead this year is actually significantly large than Obamas in 2008.
LikeLike
I don’t know where you’re getting your 50-50 numbers but I’m about 101% certain that they haven’t finished counting the day-of votes — most of the votes that rolled in on the 7th were the early mail-in ballots — and a large portion of the 2.6m that I’ve talked about are provisional ballots handed out on election day. So, I’m not sure that you can have a 50-50 or any other number when they haven’t been counted, yet. But I’ve been wrong before, I s’ppose…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Non provisional day of ballots split about 50-50. Since the 400k lead Hillary got was right at the start when all the mail in ballots came in and she was up by about 26%. Then the lead stayed at about 400k the whole night. So I figured her non provisional day of vote at about 50%. Anyway CA really should break down the differences. Also about 700k or 27% of the votes are provisional, the majority about 69% are Late VBM. I do think Sanders will gain some votes in the provisional but Late VBM should still favor Hillary.
Again I would like to ask about 2008 vs 2016 calling of the race. Why is it so wrong now but in 2008 no one really had a problem with it?
LikeLike
Straw-man. No one said that there was anything “not-wrong” about any other race. We are discussing this one
LikeLike
The point is if they have always done it one way, wouldnt changing the way the report this time be wrong? I actually think it would be fraudulent if they DIDN’T report that she was the presumptive nominee.
LikeLike
“Obama’s victory came on the last day of the Democratic campaign schedule, as voters in South Dakota and Montana voted in the final primaries” and “By early in the evening, all major news organizations had announced that Obama had clinched the Democratic nomination…”
Remember the schedule changes every year.
Early in the evening on the last day of primaries with two states wrapping up. vs. day before the last Super Tuesday and before 7 states and precincts have yet to vote — see the difference?
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24944453/ns/politics-decision_08/t/obama-claims-democratic-nomination/#.V1rFZ3ErLnA — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2008
http://frontloading.blogspot.com/2009/03/2008-presidential-primary-calendar.html
LikeLike
I think the point is all the states report provisional results, all of them, it’s not a conspiracy or mis reporting. Between the provisional and final results they keep on counting and adjusting till the final deadline. It doesn’t make a difference how many articles you post, no action you take will change it at this point as the votes have been cast and they just need to finish counting them. It may well be that Bernie gets a higher proportion of the yet to be counted ballots, but he has close to zero chance of winning the state because of two key reasons.
1) Exit polls gave Hillary a 10 point margin. you would think that Bernie would need to do a lot better than that on voters who turned up on the day.
2) Almost every poll showed Hillary leading Bernie at any time during the campaign. there was only one that gave Bernie a small gap.
There is simply no way he will win the yet to be counted ballots by 10 point margin. In fact even if he did manage that miracle, it still wouldn’t be enough to secure the nomination.Bernie needed to win these last few states by a 40 point margin to win a majority of pledged delegates. He is no way near, and this was an open Primary!
The only part I agree with is that Hillary doesn’t have enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination, but no one ever does. its true the Super delegates don’t vote till the convention. But here’s the funny thing, neither do the pledged delegates. In fact did you know that the pledged delegates can change their mind as well? They are representing their county/state and have pledged to vote for that candidate, but they can actually do whatever they like at the convention! They never do of course, and in fact the only time the Super delegates change their mind (apart from a few flip floppers) is when their candidate drops our or suspends their campaign.
The only path Bernie has is if a whole bunch of Super Delegates change their mind and overturn the majority. Now that POTUS has endorsed Hillary, there is frankly zero chance of anyone changing their mind.
On the hand I really do enjoy your posts, they are both funny and interesting, You obviously have a lot of passion and truly believe in what you are doing, but I think your energies would be better spent on something you had a chance of changing.
LikeLike
I’ll respond to this more fully in the morning, when I wake up but you’re wrong right out of the gate — I’m sure that you’re familiar with my Oregon work & the AP still hasn’t updated. Even further back, there’s a good 6%/30k vote difference in AZ & they still haven’t updated. Updating doesn’t really count unless you do it, oh I don’t know, before the final convention? It’s the damned AP, fer chrissake, I mean they could put me on their payroll, easy-peasy, bada-bing-bada-boom — accurate counts. Just like that. Not very hard. I have a problem with multi-billion dollar media conglomerates that can’t be bothered to keep an accurate count — isn’t that pretty much their job? Like, to report news & stuff? What’s not news-worthy about accurate election results? And it’s not that it’s not worth their time either — lemme tell ya, from the views I get on those articles, I know that there’re a WHOLE LOTTA people who are interested in knowing the updated, accurate results. So, let’s think, now — you got one of the biggest media organizations in the world who, we must assume, is interested in both reporting news & getting paid to do that. You also have a pretty damned YUGE audience of viewers (or clickers or whatever they are these days) just salivating over the updated, accurate counts of dozens of elections. Why wouldn’t they just update the results? It’s not like it’s hard — I am, admittedly, a poor Oregonian poet with a degree in eastern philosophy, & I am able to crunch these results rather easily. So, it’s not hard, there’s a huge audience (& therefore ad revenue for all of them), & one of the most well-organized media organizations in the world — what’s missing here? Why isn’t it happening? Answer that question for me, Johnny — G’night (and thanks for commenting)
LikeLike
i think the answer is simply that they don’t believe it is that important to update the numbers as frequently as you do. I agree, it should be that difficult, but they prioritize how much resource depending on the amount of interest at the time. So during the vote, and just after etc, interest is very high, so they update frequently. When a day or two passes, they update less frequently, because most people have lost interest and have moved on to the next primary.
The only number that really matters (in this primary) is the delegate count, and they update this pretty much every day. i guess my point is simply that I don’t buy this whole “the media is lying to you” part.
it’s the same with this whole super delegate thing you get hung up on. it’s not a lie when they include the total list of delegates. they make it pretty clear they are including Super delegates, and they make it pretty clear they are unbound. I keep hearing about super delegates not voting until July, but I re-iterate my point, this is true for ALL delegates. this whole primary process is about securing as many delegates as you can, pledged, promised, endorsed, whatever, they all count when they vote, and the total is exactly that. Of course the numbers can change, delegates can flip, even bound delegates can flip, but the total should be the total.
You mix up what is “unfair” and what is fact.
FACT : Hillary has secured more bound delegates than Bernie, it is now mathematically impossible for Bernie to overtake Hillary, even if the final vote tallies change, they never move the delegate count by more than one or two, certainly not the 200 swing Bernie needs
FACT : Hillary has secured more pledged/endorsed super delegates than Bernie, it is now mathematically impossible for Bernie to overtake Hillary
FACT : Hillary has therefore secured the majority of delegates and is by all definitions the presumptive and likely nominee.
FACT : The AP report BOTH numbers, they make it pretty clear that Hillary is the likely nominee, and they make it pretty clear which numbers are which, they use pretty colours and everything.
I just don’t see the lie or the conspiracy. i do however agree with you on one thing, it is unfair, the whole caucus concept is very unfair, not allowing independents, a little unfair (i could argue this both ways), super delegates very unfair, but these are the rules, and each state sets their own rules. i think your energies would be better spent here on changing the rules, not this year, you can;t change the rules in the middle of the game, but for future years.
LikeLike
I didn’t know there were exit polls. I thought they had canceled them for CA (and the rest).
LikeLike
Citizen exit polls were organized in the 10 days leading up to the vote after Edison cancelled. trust vote.org put it together. The MSM cancelled b/c trust vote.org sued to make the unadjusted exit polls from earlier primaries public. Instead of providing the information, they cancelled the all future exit polls.
LikeLike
Need to differentiate between *early* VBM (older conservative voters) which accounted for the initial bump right after the polls closed, and last-minute VBMs. Many of these are likely from voters who registered or re-registered in May- which would likely favor Sanders.
LikeLike
The way I remember it, in 2008 it was called for Obama once he had reached the magic number based on pledged delegates and the supers that had OFFICIALLY AND PUBLICLY endorsed him. In 2016 AP called it for Hillary, saying she had apparently hit the magic number based on ANONYMOUS supers that PRIVATELY told AP they were going to vote for her at the convention. Not the same, sorry.
LikeLike
Oh so you have a problem that AP actually checked with super delegates? She was like 30 or so away when she won PR and was going to pass the magic number for sure on Tuesday. They checked with and found that her super delegate count already was enough to put her over the top so they announced to get the scoop on the story. That is what news orgs do. Anyway Hillary is above the magic number by 300+ and almost all the super delegates that said they would vote for her are public. Would it now be okay to call her the Presumptive nominee?
I honestly have no problem with some people thinking AP called it a day early although it was 100% standard practice on how things always work. It when you imply that there is some grand conspiracy that is when I have a problem. If you look you will pretty much see that they’ve always done it this way and is no different than 2008.
LikeLike
The main difference between 2008 and 2012, as you pointed out, is that in 2008 the media waited until AFTER the CA primaries to declare Obama the winner based on pledged+SD’s. If you don’t think the fact that they made the announcement the night before the CA primary had any effect on voter turnout (which greatly benefited clinton) then I don’t know what to tell you.
LikeLike
Lol, in 2008, the CA primary was like in February! The AP don’t care about suppressing voter turnout, they just wanted a scoop!
LikeLike
CA was in Feb in 2008. AP called it as soon as they could in 2008, which was after the last primary, since it was much closer in 2008 than it was this year. With no delegates from CA or NJ, Hillary still had enough to put her over the top. BTW I agree with Johnny, AP pretty much only cares about getting the scoop on things.
LikeLike
I think you’re full of it —I’m one of those voters and I voted for Bernie and so did all of my friends— I don’t think Hillary has a chance when it comes to these mail in votes sounds like you like to rig elections to
LikeLike
I had a thought today- what if it is her that is being blind-sided? What if something so big is coming down the pike that the stance of her ‘winning’ must be held in order for the truth to hold in some way. Just a thought. Everything about this election cycle is out of ‘wonderland’ and deeply down the rabbit hole. I love your writing.
LikeLike
Holy God. I guess Bernie will be filing legal action due to all of this injustice. and if he doesn’t I guess he is either a sellout or what?
LikeLike
The fact is that the superdelegates who pledged to Hillary are not going to change to Bernie, which was his only hope of surpassing her in the nomination vote. Bernie will not win the nomination vote, so his focus needs to be on keeping the core issues on the front burner and not letting Hillary and the Democratic Party establishment slip back into their comfort zone of having compromised away single payor healthcare, etc.
LikeLike
Not sure your numbers are quite right in terms of the share of uncounted ballots vs total: I think the uncounted figure is for ALL parties (including Reps), while the figures for Hillary and Bernie are, well, figures for the Dems alone. You need to compare apples to apples: total uncounted vs total counted. (Of course, ideally, total Dem uncounted vs total Dem counted, but that is impossible as we don’t know the former figure.) Thanks for your work!!!
LikeLike
THIS! A lawsuit for racketeering has been filed showing that the elections have been rigged since 2004. She is not the winner and it’s all coming out… media is being sued too….stay tuned!
THEY SAY BERNIE IS THE TRUE NOMINEE AND IT WILL BE ANNOUNCED SOON!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Just because a lawsuit has been filed does it mean the lawsuit has merit.
Who are the “they” you speak of?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make sure that you have a good, open minded listen to the above. The “they” is all there. The “they” are speaking the “unspeakable”.
LikeLike
Watch the video. I feel sorry for you, you don’t do your own research.
LikeLiked by 1 person
More information about the suit… https://youtu.be/GdwKuqtTXc8?t=1m34s
LikeLike
Hey John,
Not meaning to pour water on your fire, but those 2.6+ mil votes and counting represent all political parties. Currently the DEM share of vote is ~59%. So that would mean roughly 1.534 mil DEM votes. There is a .44mil deficit.
So to catch up Bernie would need (1.534+0.44)/(1.534*2)*100 = 64.3% of those DEM votes.. Which is not inconceivable considering HRC early advantage in VBM reporting..
That % doesn’t include adjustments for ballots rejected, new VBM totals (they will go up as more VBM votes arrive by Friday), nor any adjustment for likely higher % of DEM/NPP-DEM in the Provisionals.
Cheers Will
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Jamesrbs10's Blog and commented:
We need some sanity and guidance and here is the best with facts…..SHARE FAR AND WIDE.
LikeLike
delusional
LikeLike
Ok, so The POTUS is wrong and you are right? Yeah, that’s not going to fly champ. I think he knows a little more than you what it takes to win the Democratic Party’s nomination.
You need to face the fact that you have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re a sad obscure nothing who tried to prove himself clever and instead proved himself an idiot.
LikeLike
Absolutely right. It takes a war criminal, fracking marketer and overall bank soldier…just like Obama, to fulfill the role of Dem nominee. Bernie should have started speaking about what the party is really about: murdering, mostly black and brown women and children and stealing for profit. Go DNC!
LikeLike
Here is an update about the CA Exit AUDIT that was performed on June 7.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, it is not over in many ways. Bernie or Bust! Padilla: Estimated 8 million Californians voted in June primary
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article82850967.html
LikeLike
I didn’t support the hill before Bernie and will not vote for the Wall Street harlot in a general. Had enough of the Clinton duo lies in the 90’s.
#BernieSanders2016 #VoteForSandersVoteForChange #ThisSeniorForBernieSanders #VoteNoToTPP #JourneyForJustice #EndTheClosedPrimary
#NeverTheHill #AnyBlueWillNotDo #NoThirdWayWallStreetReaganites #EndTheClintonDynasty
LikeLike
Hillery kicked Sanders ass get over it and get on board.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
Attorneys have an ethical obligation to advocate for their clients’ best interests. Yes it is terrible that they didn’t get more time. But you can’t blame Hillary for that. To do so shows a fundamental misunderstanding of our legal system. Sentencing is up to the judge or the jury.
LikeLike
All i know is i will not ever vote for hrc.
LikeLike
Thank you for publishing this! Unfortunately, this chapter in HilLIARy’s Grand Heist of the Presidential Race has proven (mildly) efficient in extinguishing the Bern. As I’m sure many have witnessed, there has been a few #BernieOrBusters turn #BlueNoMatterWho by falling for the fascist, fear-mongering #NeverTrump progaganda of the Clinton/DNC mafia. My mind is reeling and my hands sore from typing hundreds of rebuttals to their proclamations. Personally, I am kind-of glad the Democratic National Commitee has allowed this. It has solidified my disdain, no DISGUST in the party. It has proven beyond all doubt that the party is no longer a viable, and is broken beyond repair. This has renewed every Independant’s Berning desire to ensure the death of the “2 party” system. I want to share, also, that the MILLIONS of true #BernieOrBust voters are now boycotting any and all candidates running for election as Democrats, the only exception being those who publicly endorse Bernie Sanders AND his platform. This commitment will be extended to federal, state and local elections until the DNC is non-existant…whether Bernie is their nominee, or not. I’m done. We are done. The DNC is done.
P.S.
The Green Party is not on every state’s ballot, yet. They are *desperately* in need of petitioners from specific states to help them acquire 10,000 signatures, so they can be included. Please, even if you aren’t “Green” go to their website and see if you can help. If for no other reason, it’s one more way to show the DNC & RNC we know there are better options.
(Plus, the Green Party’s Presidential nominee has publicly offered to concede her position to Bernie; and his brother, Larry, is Green Party U.K., so it’s definitely not *that* far-fetched depending on how the convention goes.)
#BernOn
LikeLike
Reblogged this on WebWeaverBlog and commented:
John Laurits tells it like it is…
LikeLike
It aint over! Never quit,neverhill and mos’def’ never Drump…
LikeLike
Dear John,
Thank you so very much for all of your heartening posts! Not only have I greatly enjoyed their content, and your enthusiasm, they have now saved me from the brink of despair. Your posts and H. A. Goodman’s videos seem to be the last remaining hope that, one way or the other, Bernie can win. Not only am I impatient for the changes Bernie has promised (with our help!), but there are many in this country who may not survive another 4 years of poverty, homelessness, or inadequate food or healthcare. I am old now, with health challenges that make it impossible for me to physically engage in marches and demonstrations, but Bernie’s campaign, and now, your posts, have brought back the excitement and fervor I experienced in my youth when I voted for George McGovern. Over the past few weeks, one by one, on-line news sources that had previously been strong supporters of Bernie’s campaign have started suggesting the inevitability of his loss and the timing of his endorsement for Hillary. Thus, once again, I thank you for your encouragement, and your shareable posts – which I have shared on my Pinterest boards (I have a couple thousand followers). Please keep up your good work!
Carol Ortiz
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
Have you heard about this lawsuit? http://yt2fb.com/shock-this-lawsuit-might-end-hillarys-run-and-prov/ ,~CORPWHORATIONS, Give me my country back or give me death! #SeeYouInPhilly #BernieOrBust #StillSanders! From two late fifties grandparents! .ATTENTION!-I think the RICO suit has been filed!! Please share and make it known!
LikeLike
Thank you John! Your articles are inspiring. We will see you in Philly, we are making the trip from the mountains in North Carolina and are meeting up with friends from NY.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
*
*
According to the California Secretary of State, there are still 2.6 votes yet to be counted. As usual, the media is lying to us.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on A Green Road Daily News.
LikeLike
John, I’ve read a number of your comments about the primary not being over, and how the math still has a path forward for Bernie. You are always, uniformly, consistently, wrong. None of your projections ever come to fruition, and when you trumpet “revisions” in the results, they always fall well within the margin of error and never effect the outcome. There is no path forward for Sanders – at least in the democratic party.
LikeLike
Hi John, These links are similar to Marie Seaver’s & CindySteve Bova’s. The last one is from Debbie at SANE PROGRESSIVE, & also contains good info. I’m thinking that this is the ***blockbuster*** news that you will share with us tomorrow, ’cause it sure has relaxed my constantly clenched gut. I believe that when this comes out, we Berners, bros or bots or whatever insults are spewed at us, will be sporting gigantic sh.. eating grins, & the others will be choking on their numbers & arrogance. So glad I found you. I share you with everyone, & as soon as I can stop donating to Bernie, you will have more coffee than you are able to ingest. Thanks so much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IAJ5fAm3Cs TrustVoteDotOrg Lawsuit
INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY AND ELECTION INTEGRITY RE LAWSUITS & ELECTION FRAUD
https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com
LikeLike