あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Nighshade586 [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

A tactical nuke against Raqqa is a valid strategic plan. Personally, I'm more a fan of thermobaric warheads, but to each their own.

[–]OliveItMaggle [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Blowing up an entire city, not to mention one that has thousands of years of history, to kill a few thousand assholes is not a valid strategic plan.

[–]hoorayb33r [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You are assuming that logic and education are strong suits of Trump supporters. They will not understand your sound logic.

[–]The_Shadow_Monk [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Um... what do you think we do now? We just blow up entire cities with "conventional" weapons... Seriously - have you seen the photos from Syria?

Also, it was a valid strategic plan in the last war America actually won.

[–]HBombthrow [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Assad decimated Syria, not the United States

[–]The_Shadow_Monk [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Um... we have decimated lots of middle eastern countries... and are arming rebel groups in Syria...

[–]OliveItMaggle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's not even remotely comparable to the devastation of a nuclear bomb. And there is no weapon on this earth that compares to the fate of those who don't immediately die in a nuclear blast and the agony of their final moments.

[–]Nighshade586 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Point taken. Where do you stand on nerve gas? The city survives, every living thing there doesn't.

[–]MrFancyShoes [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No its not. That opens the door for everyone who doesn't like us to justify nuking us on our own turf. In case you haven't been paying attention, our government has been pissing the rest of the world off for the better part of 60 years now lol Are you really that naive to think that we could drop a third nuke and not face consequences? Plus, he would never get the approval from Congress or the Senate to do so and rightfully so I might add lol