あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]DirkFroyd 29ポイント30ポイント  (11子コメント)

Why allow update posts on this sub if they can't be discussed? If you're going to lock them with the reasoning that they often do not generate legal discussions, then why would y'all shut down all discussions?

I believe the best course of action would be to choose between allowing free discussion on update posts, or banning all update posts from this sub. There's very little sense in starting a topic in this sub only to require users to visit a different sub to discuss it.

[–]_JonJon_ 19ポイント20ポイント  (8子コメント)

And there's a lot of great discussion and lessons learned to be had. In addition, people who weren't around for the initial post might have experienced the situation and we'll be missing out on insightful posts.

This is a terrible policy. At the very least, the community should have had a vote on it.

[–]DirkFroyd 13ポイント14ポイント  (7子コメント)

The general vibe I've been getting from this post and policy is that the mods and starred users feel that they are the important voices of the sub, and that how they feel is how the community feels. I believe that the vast majority of the community is directly opposed to this.

[–]grasshoppa1Quality Contributor 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

This sub is the opposite of a democracy. Whatever you people want we do the opposite of.