あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Achievement-unlocker 19ポイント20ポイント  (7子コメント)

In many cases, the user who posts an update don't link back to the original. When that happens, a kind user usually goes back, finds the original, and posts it. Is that just not going to be happening anymore?

I'm just a measly lurker. I have zero experience with the law so I'm not important enough to be a mod or starred user. I use this subreddit to learn nifty tips like what to do and what not to do and the discussions on updates are a part of that.

[–]ExpiresAfterUseQuality Contributor -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

We have no problem with lurkers, or even laymen helping out. The issue comes when we have a bunch of people making cheap puns to get karma in updates or just bashing the party they think is in the wrong. Please contribute, that is not what we are trying to stop. We are simply trying to get the rampant issues in updates under control by quarantining the discussion to /r/BestofLegalAdvice

[–]UsuallySunnyQuality Contributor[S,M] -18ポイント-17ポイント  (5子コメント)

When that happens, a kind user usually goes back, finds the original, and posts it. Is that just not going to be happening anymore?

That can happen in the bestoflegaladvice thread.

[–]cye604 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

But then that means that someone who wants to read the original would have to track down the /r/bestoflegaladvice post about the page they are already on, just to be linked back to /r/legaladvice? This seems very redundant. Heck, this whole new systems seems very poorly received by the community. I understand your goal here; make the subreddit more objective-based, but I feel this is also now stifling conversation.