use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~66 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Neutral Politics is a community dedicated to evenhanded, empirical discussion of political issues. It is a space to discuss policy and the tone of political debate.
Full Guidelines
Moderator Activity Log
Comment Hall of Fame
We expect the following from all users:
1) Be courteous to other users. Name calling, sarcasm, demeaning language, or otherwise being rude or hostile to another user will get your comment removed.
2) Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a qualified source.
3) Put thought into it. Memes and one line replies are strongly disfavored. Explain the reasoning behind what you're saying. Statements of opinion require stated reasoning.
4) Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect.
We require the following for submitting new posts:
A) Pose a specific political question as the basis for discussion. Questions that cannot be answered through logic or evidence are not permitted.
B) Provide sources. Just like for comments, new submissions need to source the facts which underlie their question.
C) Outline the issue well. Give more than just a headline, there should be some background on the question.
D) Frame it in a neutral way. The post should not be strongly leading towards a particular answer.
E) Title your post accurately. The title of the post and its contents should match.
Other Important information:
In-depth voting guide Wiki (frequent topics) Original FAQ
Relevant Subreddits:
/r/NeutralTalk
/r/AskSocialScience /r/ChangeMyView /r/Economics /r/EconPapers /r/ModeratePolitics /r/Politics /r/Scholar /r/TrueReddit /r/PoliticalFactChecking
What do the candidates stand for?
On the Issues
Resources to help make your opinion fact: Google RefDesk JustFacts.com The World Factbook ipl.org prb.org people-press.org fedstats.gov JSTOR Gap Minder Google Scholar Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
List of logical fallacies
Proud member of the /r/DepthHub Network.
[wage gap] Is this graphic accurate? (self.NeutralPolitics)
TThor が 19時間前 * 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]NandiniS [スコア非表示] 4時間前 (1子コメント)
In addition to u/haalidoodi 's excellent comment, I want to add that women's jobs are only low paid because women's work is devalued for sexist reasons.
Contrary to popular belief, we do not pay wages based on how useful or skilful the work is, but based on how much power (social, financial, political, etc) the employee has. This is why a banker makes millions more than a surgeon, it is why a "yeoman" makes more money and has more status than any "secretary" even though those jobs are literally identical.
[–]2dammkawaii [スコア非表示] たった今 (0子コメント)
The reason bankers are paid more than teachers has nothing to do with sexism. The supply of labor for bankers is much further constrained than teachers, which means the price of labor for a banker is higher than a teacher. This is due to the law of supply and demand.
π Rendered by PID 2297 on app-277 at 2016-06-04 20:04:17.115907+00:00 running a512bef country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]NandiniS [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]2dammkawaii [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)