0
1

How to square 'AWALT' with the ubiquity of long term relationships? (self.MGTOW)

E46M54 が 投稿

So I've read all the red pill philosophy and I pretty much agree with all of it.

However, I do question that if it is true, and 'AWALT' is true, how do you explain the ubiquity of LTR's, and people being together for decades in seemingly fulfilling relationships?

Is it possible that 'NAWALT' is actually true, but that it just takes so much fucking effort to find her?

Or is 'AWALT' true, and those in seemingly happy relationships are merely deluded?

Interested to hear some perspective on this.

全 2 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト (提案されたアイデア)
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because most men are easily pussy whipped.

Have you ever been around horses? Seriously, ever observed how a horse gets "broken" and eventually trained to accept a bridle and saddle?

Therein lies the answer.

[–]Xuixien_TheUnending 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're outliers/statistical anoms.

The % chance of a first marriage lasting more than ten years is 6%. SIX. PERCENT. Mind you, this applies to everyone married after a certain date, I think it's like 2009 or 2012, I forget. So there's that myth of "happily ever after" busted.

Second marriages end even faster than firsts.

Most people who do the relationship thing - it's only a few years and then they're onto someone else.