全 29 件のコメント

[–]AThrowawayAsshole 22ポイント23ポイント  (5子コメント)

He'll be back once all this 'unpleasantness' is revision deleted. Any bets on how long before this gets blanked 'to prevent harassment'?

[–]powersynth102 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh yeah, he will return. Inevitable. Probably had plenty of sockpuppets saved up anyway, should his main account be blocked.

And I know damn well he's got friends on the admin roll who are raising hell on IRC right now, "in his defense". Fuck heads.

[–]AThrowawayAsshole 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Remember, rules only apply to normies.

[–]CoffeeQuaffer 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'd put my money on two weeks, if I were a betting man.

[–]AThrowawayAsshole 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah, two weeks is about the length of the average Wikipediots' attention span.

[–]Ninebythreeinch 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

They might talk to some friendly admin to make it happen sooner tho. I'm thinking just over a week.

[–]90s_altrock_forevs 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi guys, my name is Sockaliel and I'm running for ArbCom, AMA!

[–]CaptainObivousIllustrious Looshpah 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

Buh bye, Gama...it's about fuckin' time.

But it's for the best. As Nietzsche put it, "Those who fight with monsters should take care that they do not become monsters themselves." Which is what happened to you.

I hope you can recover from it. And if you do, I would advise you to not come back. But if you insist, go ahead and edit the "East Podunk, NJ" articles and such, and leave the dangerous articles for those that can handle it without going full retard.

[–]Devonmartino 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Funny, there is actually an East Podunk, NJ article on Wikipedia.

[–]AnselmBlackheart 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

And with that, MB is fuuuuucked.

[–]EtherMan 12ポイント13ポイント  (7子コメント)

It does solve one of the issues people had with the case, that Gamaliel gets to keep his admin bit. This retirement, means that he has as a fact, resigned under a cloud per the policy and thus, MUST go through an RfA to get it back. An RfA that isn't very likely to pass.

That being said. The remedy about Gamaliel is not really what concerns me about this case, but the reasoning that the arbs are applying which for most arbs that has voted, are riddled with fallacies.

[–]RecallRethuglicans 7ポイント8ポイント  (6子コメント)

Someone is naive. Arbcom will just say it's not a cloud and let him keep them. He'll be one of those editors who paste the retired tag up for years and use that whenever he's called out again.

[–]EtherMan 4ポイント5ポイント  (5子コメント)

ArbCom are not the ones handling giving back the admin bit though.

[–]RecallRethuglicans 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

They won't take it away either

[–]EtherMan 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

No but if he's retired, he has to lose it. You're not allowed to keep the admin bit if you are retired. Also outside of ArbCom jurisdiction. Policy on that though would require him to be inactive for a a bit more though before he would policywise be considered to have gone inactive and thus, no longer eligible to keep the admin bit.

[–]RecallRethuglicans 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yeah, so he's come back, do one little thing and keep it, all the while screaming that he's "retired" so he's not responsible.

[–]AnselmBlackheart 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

While Wikipedia has issues, that is a bit far. Especially given that many admins have issues with Gamaliel.

Arbcom may cover their own, but theya re a small 'elite' group. The Admin community is much less small, and much more prone to taking out vendettas on other Admins when they can.

[–]EtherMan 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't think the rest of the admin community would agree with that.

[–]NPerez99 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

Why is Liz mentioned here, what did she do to his page? I'm wikifailing.

[–]PadaV4 15ポイント16ポイント  (3子コメント)

Liz put up the giant "RETIRED" sign per Gamaliels request. Apparently poor Gam is literary incapable of editing wikipedia anymore, but can contact his friends there just fine.

[–]Ninebythreeinch 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is Liz part of the same SJW type of admins on Wikipedia?

[–]TeamAliceIsHot 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Can someone clarify if he actually loses his administrator powers automatically when he 'retires' or do they just expire over a set period?

[–]EtherMan 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's not really any protocol for retiring. If you are inactive for a too long however, you lose your admin bit, which you can then request back at a later time without a RfA unless you lost it "under a cloud". Him going inactive like this is pretty clearly under a cloud, but it's likely going to be argued that he's not losing admin under a cloud because that will be some time from now and thus be "completely unrelated to this case". That's why at least I, feel it's NOT moot as some of Gamaliel's friends claim, if he will be desysoped from the case or not.

[–]RyuBronyLong 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

he doesn't lose them and if perchance he is inactive long enough to lose the tools (he'll log in for the minimum so moot) and wants them back, he'll argue that arbcom chose not to take them so it's not a cloud. same is true for Cu/OS - the lack of arbcom action means they can be restored. he's not resigning/retiring to make it easy for arbcom, he's doing it to make it easier for himself later.

[–]EtherMan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Anyone that has noticed that after he retired, almost all discussion from Arbs on wiki stopped and we now suddenly have a lot of votes being cast "per email"?

[–]OmnivorousCat 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

So he's pulling a Dragondragon?