Has anyone else noticed how propaganda-ish /r/politicaldiscussion has become?

Yesterday a post named "Poltifact States That Clinton's Claim That Her Email Server Was Allowed Is False" was removed. The moderator left this note;

Hello, /u/The_EA_Nazi. Thanks for contributing! Unfortunately your submission has been removed:

• Keep it civil. Do not personally insult other Redditors, or make racist, sexist, homophobic, trolling, inflammatory, or otherwise discriminatory remarks. Constructive debate is good; name calling is not.

• No Meta Discussions including topics about other subs and reddit in general.

If you feel this was done in error, or would like better clarification or need further assistance, please don't hesitate to message the moderators.

The post was entirely polite, objective, had nothing to do with meta discussion, and had made for some good discussion. Here's the deleted thread. Here's a cached version to see what the OP looked like.

Now this is already strange enough -- it's not like they have a problem with Politifact. Just the other day there was a very popular thread called "Politifact finds allegations of fraud and misconduct at Nevada Democratic convention unfounded", i.e. a Politifact finding critical of Bernie Sanders. (No mod action.) But random removals like this happens accidentally all the time, so it's probably not a big deal, right?

Well, no, because it's absolutely not a singular event. Posts criticizing the establishment has been removed from the sub for weeks, maybe months;

• A post of mine about the Wells Fargo settlement a while back got deleted.
• Another post of mine about Clinton's "downballot" funding not actually going to downballot candidates was also deleted.
• There's the two threads about Obama criticizing money in politics that were deleted and featured here on /r/undelete.
• And this thread about Clinton's Inspector General email-report. Cached

All have similarly awful mod explanations. As an example, the last was was titled

"State Dept. Inspector General issued a report highly critical of State Dept. e-mail practices today, indicating Hillary Clinton as negligent. Even if she doesn't get indicted, will Clinton's handling of this issue continue to affect the race?",

and the mod removal post says;

Do not use derogatory, demeaning, or otherwise inflammatory titles.

Kind of ridiculous, right?

These are just the ones I've seen. I don't spend much time on the sub anymore because of this and an increasingly absurd pro-Clinton faction, so I'm sure there's a bunch others I haven't noticed. Just go to the front page of the sub right now; not a single article critical of Clinton, a bunch against Trump and some against Sanders.

It could be simple bias, could be Correct the Record, could be something else entirely. But the sub has some 80 000 subscribers and is obviously being influenced. So... Thoughts?