あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Biondina 210ポイント211ポイント  (20子コメント)

Are you fucking kidding me? Do you honestly think that the zoning ordinance was amended under cover of night through illegitimate means, and further, that a cop changed that ordinance?

To answer your question (which question was vague and useless): I think you're a petulant twat who is arguing with the government about mowing your fucking lawn.

Anyone else who replies with any more rational of an argument to your utter bullshit is lending it a credence it does not fucking deserve.

[–]Dysnomi[S] -23ポイント-22ポイント  (19子コメント)

http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/60/VIII/62/3/a

60.62 (3) (a) (a) In counties having a county zoning ordinance, no zoning ordinance or amendment of a zoning ordinance may be adopted under this section unless approved by the county board. This paragraph applies only in counties with a population of less than 485,000, and does not apply to a town that has withdrawn from county zoning.

Which never happened. So, legally, the ordinance is non-withstanding.

I mean, this is a place where educated people gather to discuss the law, right? Not a place where Donald Trump bronies gather to spit and curse at people, no?

[–]Biondina 40ポイント41ポイント  (18子コメント)

How do you know if they didn't follow procedure? You didn't know they even amended it until the cop showed up to your door. Are these assumptions?

This is the place where we usually have intelligent discussions about the law, but sometimes we have to dumb it down for fools like you.

[–]Dysnomi[S] -14ポイント-13ポイント  (17子コメント)

Um, did I forget the part of the story where the public attended the board meeting and unanimously opposed the amendment to the ordinance, only to have the village board president roll his eyes, wave his finger, get red in the fave, and then sit for sixty seconds of silence waiting for someone to make the motion to amend (because I suppose the president isn't allowed to make motions, I could be wrong.)

But, I'm no idiot. I talk to people. I read the code (hell, if I didn't I wouldn't have known about my exemption which was even on the citation, people never question the words on the citation). The state code clearly says what municipalities are required to do to amend a zoning ordinance. They're not so clear as to what constitutes a zoning ordinance, but in historical cases they've discussed this and it appears to me that an amendment specifying where one may or may not mow according to it's zone would be a zoning ordinance.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2890431570291437582&q=2012+WI+7&hl=en&as_sdt=4,50&as_vis=1

The above case talks about it at length. It seems to be the where rather than the how that is the difference between a zoning ordinance and a police powers ordinance. The amendment specifically changed the where of the applicability of the ordinance.

[–]Biondina 38ポイント39ポイント  (16子コメント)

That case addresses whether an ordinance is a zoning ordinance or non-zoning police power ordinance.

Because you've been purposefully vague about how you know what occurred at the ordinance hearing, I'm going to assume you only heard about how they conducted the process, rather than saw it for yourself. I'm also going to assume you don't know the exact procedure so you don't know how they came to their decision and can't adequately determine its legitimacy.

Regardless, given the case you so helpfully provided, there is a good chance they passed what was actually a non-zoning police power ordinance. Why do I say that? Because it is completely unlikely they were recklessly violating the statute by passing it without county approval.

You need to buck up, drink some goddamn milk, be an adult and mow your fucking lawn.