あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]windowlicker_son [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

How does this logic apply to the transgender bathroom issue? How is it not literally identical?

[–]tupacsnoducket [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

one of them is a person holding a weapon of death the other a person holding a penis.

[–]windowlicker_son [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

"You idiot, you can't expose me to that, this is a penis / vagina free zone."

That is literally the same argument...

[–]BarrettBuckeyeconstitutional conservative [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

Furthermore, the assumption is that a criminal will bring weapons to a gun free zone regardless of what rules/laws are in place, which makes sense. If you're going to murder someone using a gun, I doubt a sign of a gun with a red circle and a slash through it is going to stop you. I don't think the same holds true for trans people. A law preventing them from entering an area may deter them from doing so, especially since the act they're going to perform is presumably legal.

[–]windowlicker_son [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Lol please, care to explain how the equivalence is false? Do you have any integrity or are all your political views center around memes?

[–]BarrettBuckeyeconstitutional conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I edited my post to explain it.