28
29

/r/TheDonald tries to do science, fails miserably. (np.reddit.com)

TomatoHerePh.D. in cuckology が 投稿

全 23 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]TomatoHerePh.D. in cuckology[S] 27ポイント28ポイント  (18子コメント)

First of all, I would remind you that this guy is a nazi, a very edgy kind of nazi.

here is my compilation. rate pls:

Sure.

Statistics show how violent crimes have skyrocketed in Sweden because of mass immigration.

In the year 1950: 190 robberies. [1]

In the year 2011: 9700 robberies. [2]

In the year 1975: 421 rapes. [3]

In the year 2014: 6294 rapes. [4]

In the year 1993 immigrants/foreigners committed 56% of all rapes in Sweden. At the time immigrants made up around 12% of Swedens population. Source: Von Hofer, Sarnecki & Tham (1996)

Immigrants from North African countries over-representation when it comes to rape is 2300% (Compared to Swedish males, a north african immigrant is 23 times more likely to commit a rape) Source: BRÅ Report (1996).

Sources for the crime statistics above:

[1]: Brott och straff i Sverige: Historisk kriminalstatistik 1750–2005. Hanns Von Hofer.

[2]: Brottsförebyggande rådets rapport: Brottsutvecklingen i Sverige år 2008-2011.

[3] and [4]: https://www.bra.se/download/18.22a7170813a0d141d21800052648/05+Sexualbrott.pdf

badscience intesifies

The EU center of Scripp's college has a interesting report on immigration and rape (the formatting is a little odd though), citing from Conclusion, "Ergo, whilst there are no verifiable correlations between numbers of immigrants and rape rates, it is crucial to consider why the various sexual attacks in Germany and Sweden have evoked emotionally-charged responses from the general public and right-wing parties."

Racists often cite Sweden as an example of "the rape capital of Europe". The EU parliament's report gives a clear reason for the high rape numbers in Europe. In particular, Swedish law defines rape, contrary to other, much broader[1]:

"Begreppet våldtäkt [har] blivit könsneutralt och utvidgats så att det utöver samlag även innefattar annan jämförbar handling med en person som är oförmögen att lämna sitt samtycke. [...] Efter en lagändring 1 april 2005 är det numera lika allvarligt att förgripa sig på en person som på egen hand har druckit sig kraftigt berusad som på en nykter person. Från och med 1 juli 2013 skärptes sexualbrottslagstiftningen [och] utvidgades till att omfatta de fall där offret reagerar med passivitet."

This roughly translates to "The concept of rape has become gender neutral and extended to beyond intercourse, namely it includes other comparable act with a person who is incapable of giving consent. [...] After a change in the law April 1, 2005, it is now just as serious to molest a person, who, on their own, have drunk themselves heavily drunk as a sober person. From 1 July 2013 tightened sexual offenses law and was extended to include cases where the victim react with passivity."

This do have a enormous influence on the rape statistics. Moreover, Swedish law uses ‘extensive counting’ when reporting rape and as such counts every instance of rape separately, even if committed by the same accused on the same day[2]

[2]: Amnesty International, 2010

Whites will be a minority in their country before the end of this century.

White Britons may be a minority by 2066. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10032296/White-Britons-will-be-minority-by-2066-says-professor.html

Native Irish projected to become a minority in Ireland by 2050. http://nonalignedmedia.com/2016/02/demographic-replacement-native-irish-projected-to-become-minorities-in-ireland-by-2050/

Germany will have a nonwhite majority in one generation. http://newobserveronline.com/germany-nonwhites-majority-in-one-generation/

Whites in America will be a minority a decade sooner than thought earlier.http://whitegenocideproject.com/us-latest-census-predicts-whites-minority-a-decade-earlier-than-expected/

Native Swedish will be a minority by 2050. http://whitegenocideproject.com/white-genocide-swedish-minority-by-2050/

Native Danes will be a minority by the turn of this century. http://www.b.dk/viden/danskere-bliver-en-minoritet-i-danmark

nutzi intensifies

There are multiple things wrong with this statement: first of all, it implicitly assumes that this is a result of immigration, which it is not: it is a result of low birth rates. Secondly, it assumes that this is inheritly bad.

Race mixing is unhealthy.

Gosh... Here we go again.

Mixed race people are more likely to have psychological problems than single race people. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

ProTip: Read the papers you are linking.

This isn't about the mixing of races, but multiracial identity, which is really about the perception of being multiracial, i.e., a construct by the society.

Mixed race people are completely screwed for transplantations. http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/29/match4lara-mixed-race-marrow-search-thats-going-viral/?_r=0

Nothing in that article even remotely said that.

Mixed race people are more likely to be obese. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5495312_The_Prevalence_of_Obesity_in_Ethnic_Admixture_Adults

Do you even socioeconomics, brah?

Look: this is a study of the state, not the cause. Nothing in that study pointed at a genetic cause. Correlation and causation is not the same.

Mixed race are more likely to die at birth. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/?report=classic

I don't have time to read this study, but this one seems fine.

Race mixing only benefits the inferior race. Black-White mixed have a higher IQ than Blacks, but lower IQ than Whites. http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2016/03/race-and-iq-mixed-populations.html

Hahahaha. You just linked to a neo-nazi blog as a source. Moreover, that is not how genetics works. Lastly, there is no "inferior race", there isn't even a scientific concept of "race".

[–]TomatoHerePh.D. in cuckology[S] 19ポイント20ポイント  (6子コメント)

Continue from above (I hit the max character limit):

Racial admixture leads to less healthy human beings overall. https://www.reddit.com/r/HBD/comments/4g3z11/racial_admixture_leads_to_less_healthy_human/

Nice, you linked to a nazi subreddit as source. Also, that comment is plain wrong and very cherry picky. The very opposite is true: mixed races leads to more healthy individuals.

To understand why, we need to understand inbreeding depression. Inbreeding depression happens when two genetically similar individuals produce offspring with reduced biological fitness. Consider a recessive deleterious allele (think of it as a "negative gene"), a. When recessive alleles have a dominant counterpart, A, this negative phenotypic trait will not affect the individual, but once the genetic similarities are sufficiently high, the probability for aa genotypes increases (since the parents are genetically similar), making the individual get an a phenotypic expression. Due to their reduced phenotypic expression and their consequent reduced selection, recessive genes are, more often than not, detrimental phenotypes by causing the organism to be less fit to its natural environment.

Multiracial children are generally healthy than monoracial ones[3]. There is one legit risk, though: Discrimination[4]. This can affect the child in multiple ways. Note only are the subject to discrimination in social interaction, but in fact also institutional discrimination from government, private and public organizations.

[3]: Binning, K. R., Unzueta, M. M., Huo, Y. J. and Molina, L. E. (2009), The Interpretation of Multiracial Status and Its Relation to Social Engagement and Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Social Issues

[4]: Seven essential facts about multiracial youth, APA

Alon Ziv and his book have been completely debunked. https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/alon_ziv_on_race_mixing/

Nice, you link to a neo-nazi illuminati nutjob conspiracy theory website.

Multiculturalism is impractical.

Yeah, when we have people like you, it is.

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Again, research shows that this is related to socioeconomic effects. These socioeconomic disadvantages largly originate in discrimination and long-term oppressive systems.

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Care to read the papers you link? The abstract reads (emphasis mine):

Ethnic diversity is increasing in most advanced countries, driven mostly by sharp increases in immigration. In the long run immigration and diversity are likely to have important cultural, economic, fiscal, and developmental benefits. In the short run, however, immigration and ethnic diversity tend to reduce social solidarity and social capital.

That is hardly the conclusion you extrapolated.

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Even if we assume that, that does not justify racism. Rape is a rational and evolutionary advantageous strategy, but does that mean it should be allowed?

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Correlation ≠ Causation

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n%202005-1.pdf

cites Rusthon. Nice.

Generally, Rushton have a very poor understanding of not only genetics, but also other subjects, such as sociology, which they almost[1] ignore. There are a variety of other factors they ignore or underestimate the influence of as well[2].

In particular, his version of genetic similarity theory assumes multiple things, which are simply not correct. It assumes that humans can be classified into genetically distinct races. Moreover, it relies on a gross misrepresentation of r/K theory, which is the main concept he use in his works.

Many of the propositions stated in the mentioned work are only informally justified, without supporting data. Such an example can be found in the table on page 265. This cites Rusthon's research based on three surveys he had made in the past, all of which have been criticized for being conducted with an adequate control group study and ignoring contradictory evidence (see Hartung's critique). Furthermore, they have been criticized for having a non-generalizable sample (see Hallpike's critique). C. Loring Brace's review of REB contains a detailed critique (sic):

”Virtually every kind of anthropologist may be put in the position of being asked to comment on what is contained in this book, so, whatever our individual specialty, we should all be prepared to discuss what it represents. Race, Evolution, and Behavior is an amalgamation of bad biology and inexcusable anthropology. It is not science but advocacy, and advocacy for the promotion of "racialism." Tzvetan Todorov explains "racialism," in contrast to "racism," as belief in the existence of typological essences called "races" whose characteristics can be rated in hierarchical fashion (On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993, p. 31). "Racism," then, is the use of racialist assumptions to promote social or political ends, a course that Todorov regards as leading to "particularly catastrophic results." Perpetuating catastrophe is not the stated aim of Rushton's book, but current promoters of racist agendas will almost certainly regard it as a welcome weapon to apply for their noxious purposes.”

There are thousands of other works tearing down their research.

The Nazis had incredibly high IQ and where the intellectual elite of the time.

... and that made their actions justifiable?

Trump voters are more intelligent than other Republicans. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-better-educated-republican-voters-may-come-as-a-surprise-2016-03-11

That isn't what that article states, but to expand on this claim liberals are in fact more intelligent than conservatives. The reasons for this are unknown, although multiple hypothesis exists on why.

Angela merkel was a communist and secretary of propaganda for the communist youth.

omgz, source?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2328536/Angela-Merkel-Communist-links-new-image-uniform-released.html

dailymail? dailymail, daily-fucking-mail.

Back to

here is my compilation. rate pls:

I rate -5/10.

[–]DevFRus 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

I think I need to go die of shame. I am an author on one of the papers that nutjob "cites". I feel awful for not having a clear "go away neonazis" disclaimer in the abstract. Because this isn't the first time :(.

[–]TomatoHerePh.D. in cuckology[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's interesting. I work with pure mathematics, so I'm lucky not having nazis cite my papers.

[–]dorylinus 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Because this isn't the first time :(.

Wut

[–]TomatoHerePh.D. in cuckology[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you work with the subject of ethnic groups and especially the mixing of those, I could imagine that being common. Remember, these people simply pick the title or some short quote, which can easily be misleading.

[–]spottybotty 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

He had me at "dailymail.co.uk"

[–]donaldosaurus 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I rate -5/10.

I rate it -5/7, the worst possible score.

[–]Lux_Stella 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm disappointed that poorly-sourced Stormfront copypasta does so well on Reddit, but at the same time I'm not particularly surprised.

[–]TomatoHerePh.D. in cuckology[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

/r/the_donald is a shithole (they perfectly represents Trump and his supporters).

[–]TotesMessenger 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]Thoctar 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

When anyone tries to call Sweden the rape capital of Europe, remember that Indonesia officially has a lower rape level, despite widespread misogyny including virginity tests required for females to join the military and police.