>>12844
>Wanting to fuck the horse pussy does not mean that you have to join the LGBROFLWTFZOMG community.
correct. being gay does not mean that you have to join lgbtqz or gay pride either.
>the SJW-wannabes
you apparently don't understand that defending facts with reason and logic is NOT social justice.
saying zoo isn't a sexual orientation is like saying the earth is flat. when then someone walks in and
says "well, actually no. the earth is a sphere", then that has NOTHING to do with social justice.
it could have been SJ if i was advocating zoo rights. but i wasnt even going there. all i was saying
was that animals are not inanimate objects. this doesnt even have anything to do with identity politics.
>"identity" based on what they do with their genitals.
OMG, why do people still not understand?
1) an identity is not constructed (such as social constucts), and identity is "developed"
2) sexuality develops, therefor sexuality is a small part of your identity
3) zoosexual identity has NOTHING to do with what zoophiles do with their genitals. it something to do with HOW YOU FEEL about animals.
can you fall in romantic unconditional love? if you have this ability then you are zoo. if you actually have sex or remain abstinent
has NOTHING to do with the sexual orientation (at last not in this case). in other words, identity = what the heart wants and not what the genitalia do.