3
4

Do you actually think Marcus Rashford should become a starter in the next season guys? (self.reddevils)

Varnagel が 投稿

全 34 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]tocitusMemphis 38ポイント39ポイント  (9子コメント)

I don't know if what I'm about to say is blindingly obvious but no, he shouldn't be a starter next season.

Rashford has been wonderful for us so far - he's really provided something different but he is still very young and has a tendency for inconsistency (to be expected at his age).

He can drift in and out of matches and I think he shouldn't have the pressure of a starting spot on him next season, I would much prefer we bring in another striker who rotates with him during the season.

He looks a wonderful talent but he needs to be managed properly otherwise he could easily burn out.

[–]mrpiggywinkles52Rooney 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

IMO he should nearly always be on the bench as an option say we get Ibra and need a faster striker near the end of a game we could bring him on For example

Most of his starts should be I'm Europa or that FA Cup

[–]The_Second_BestScholes 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's how I see it. Next season I'd love him to be a regular fixture in the match day squad getting 10-15 premier league starts and 10-15 substitute appearances.

[–]wharsmetoothpicson 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Surely you would have to make the same argument for Martial then?

[–]AMAaboutAMemphis 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Martial has been playing all year and established himself as quality. I don't think anyone can argue he's not a nailed on starter.

[–]DoctorWittenLVG 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the difference is that Martial is two years older and more consistent than Rashford. Those two years are a big deal for young players in development.

I think Rashford should start on a somewhat consistent basis, but we need to sign or develop (maybe Memphis or Janujaz?) someone to be a viable alternative to ease the burden in the event Rashford is having an off-game or is in an inconsistent spell.

[–]youngsahaLVG 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Why the hell would you drop Rashford on the bench next season?

[–]tocitusMemphis -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Sorry I thought my reasoning was clear.

I don't want to give an 18 year old the pressure of being the starting striker and he also needs to find consistency as he does drift in and out of matches.

Having another striker (Ibra for example) who can rotate with him would be good for his development

[–]zurcom 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rashford needs the playing time in the first team. Dropping him next season would not be good for his development. He's already proven himself. His rate of goals is already better than Vardy or Kane.

[–]youngsahaLVG -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Age doesn´t matter if you have the talent. But I agree with you that we need more depth in the front, but there is no reason for buying a striker to be our main striker when we have Rashford.

[–]noob_senpaiHad enough, next pls 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

If we are to compete in the PL, EL and for the FA and League Cup as well, then we will need several strikers to be able to rotate (and in case of injury). As Rooney may switch to the midfield, we are left with Martial and Rashford as possible strikers - plus the others from the U21. I think we certainly need to add one more striker to the team, and Rashford will still get enough playtime, even if he won't always start.

[–]Lost_And_NotFoundJones 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

What strikers are actually left in the U21s? Who'd been starting up front for them at the end of the season.

[–]Lax4Evr 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We have Ashley Fletcher who is out on loan to Barnsley

[–]elisalter -3ポイント-2ポイント  (3子コメント)

that's if rooney is back next year :(

[–]Reibus 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ronney isnt going anywhere, hes the biggest commercial pull off any of our players and he's 4 goals off Charlton's record, so the manager whoever it is will just be told to make do with him

[–]artofthenumber7 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes he should start.

[–]PX44 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Give him the EL and cup runs I think - certainly the early stages of the EL. Plenty of games for him, and it stops Thursday nights stinging quite so much. Outside of that, 10-20 minutes at the end of PL games wouldn't hurt.

[–]obadetonaHerrera na na naaaa 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't think Ibra would be happy on the bench

[–]tartanbornandredLaw 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

He has the role currently on merit so yes.

But with Rooney looking good in midfield and Martial seemingly best from the left, we need more options up front if we are to compete for the title and 3 cups. Ibrahimovich probably makes sense as he offers something different and could take some pressure of Rashford but wont hold his development back long term.

[–]GamerKurisu 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'll get down voted but I would go with a no as well, at first I didn't think Martial should be a starter but he has been so consistent maybe he should. I think Rashford should be rotated and slowly bedded in. I seriously don't want him burnt out!

[–]macismydog 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why would you get downvoted for a popular opinion

[–]GamerKurisu 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be honest I didn't think it would be a popular opinion, though I'm very much glad it is! :D

[–]_Banti_Best 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No. We need a proven goalscorer to be competetive again. But there is no denying that he deserves his fair amount of gametime next season.

[–]BlackBossalini 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We need that "20 goals a season" striker.

I'm all for giving Rashford minutes, but to get back into Europe, and challenge for titles, we need that star striker right now.

[–]pcaming 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Our best seasons have all been when we had 3+ really good strikers. Going into next season with Rashford as our starter will be similar to going into this season with just Rooney. A recipe for disaster. Not to slight the kid, I love him, and he's done exceptionally well. It's just not a very sensible idea.

[–]wharsmetoothpicson 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not like we have to declare our first 11 at the start of the season or anything. Places on the team are selected on form & merit & are rotated depending on fitness, there's too many variables to say whether he should or shouldn't be a starter. If he keeps playing the way he's playing why or how could he be shifted out of the side?

[–]EddieMcDowallMartial 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

A starter? Yes. A regular starter? Probably not.

If we don't sign another CF (shudder) then he should start some games but not all of them, he's young and needs to be rotated, but being young those legs should have the beating of many players he comes up against even when they're all fresh. He would then be regularly subbed out.

If we sign another striker, it depends on whom and their age. If we sign an older striker without a huge ego (so not Ibra) then it would likely be good for the older striker to come on for Rashford and have the advantage of playing against tired defenders. If we sign Ibra or another top top striker then that striker is going to want to start, in which case Rashford on the bench would be a wonderful asset coming on against a defense tired out by that striker.

[–]BigCheeserKeano 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

He should be a first team player and should get into lots of games. But he should be rested as needed,he is young and I don't want to see him like Michael Owen, Martial should also be rested. The best player to mix with those two would be an older striker who will not be here forever and will be here to keep us going until the two young players have developed more.

[–]selotipkusutMartial 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Deciding who should be in the starting lineup is the very purpose of pre season. Currently he's definitely our best CF with Tony at LWF and should start everytime now that Wayne is finding form as CM.

Who knows what will happen next season.

[–]Comessuer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

He should play a lot but I think he should be deputy to a proven world class striker who we bring in. I think that would be best for the club and for Rashford in the long term.

If we do sign Zlatan for example you're talking about a 35 year old who has never played in a league without a winter break and is coming from France where most games are probably like training matches for PSG. It would be silly if Rashford didn't get a lot of matches in that situation.

[–]DoctorWittenLVG 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

He should be a starter. But unlike Martial (who's a couple years older), I don't think he's shown the consistency levels required to warrant starting as many matches as say Rooney or Smalling. Given a year or two Rashford will probably attain that high level of consistency, but at this point i don't think he's reached it yet.

[–]homa-bird 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course he should he's amazing, the only question is his position, maybe being the lone striker is too much responsibility, so either you play in a front 2 or you try him on the right wing, I don't know.