全 30 件のコメント

[–]Trussed_Up [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

When Mohammad first had his "revelations" I believe he questioned whether or not he was possessed by an angel... or by a demon. Now I dunno bout you guys, but I've never heard of angel possession before.

I'm gonna go with no, he's not a prophet, just a murderous lunatic who spread the faith of himself far and wide by killing anyone who disagreed with the presumption that he was a prophet. And hey, effective tactic.

[–]kroen071 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Clearly you haven't seen Supernatural before!

[–]Trussed_Up [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Actually I hadn't thought of that. Supernatural was a fantastic show btw. Totally recommend the first 5 seasons for anyone on this subreddit. The central themes were faith in family and the personal responsibility of humans for making a better world. Extremely conservative show, as mainstream tv shows go.

[–]MildlyRedacted [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Paraphrase: "There's so many Muslims, and Islam has lasted so long that it has to be true."

Does this pass for logic with these dopes?

[–]yertle_my_turtle [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

They're just hedging their bets. If an Islamic caliphate is established, they might not be the first ones to have their heads cut off. Instead, the women will be enslaved and raped and the men will be conscripted into the military wing to serve as cannon fodder. For the liberal, this is preferable.

[–]MildlyRedacted [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

But the truly important question is, will this caliphate barbarically segregate people into different bathrooms just because of a silly little chromosome?

[–]StabbyDMcStabberson [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Wonder what they would do if it was pointed out that there's a larger religion, about four times as old as Islam, that thoroughly contradicts it?

[–]PoliteAsFuc [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I will get right on that, right after I vote for a democrat, marry a man and give up all my guns. /s

[–]Pandos636 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This HP author is an idiot. Lets say for a second that you were able to convinced all Christians that was a prophet and not a false prophet (good luck with that). Would that actually stop Christian-Muslim violence? No. Muslims fight each other over different types of Islam, why would a Christian who says "nah, it's cool, I like Muhammad" be okay to radicals?

This isn't just a stupid idea. It's a stupid idea that would never work.

[–]TheDubDubs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

While you're at it, why not call of Jews to recognize Jesus as the Son of God?

[–]promethean7 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Sure, there can and has been arguments made that Mohammad is the False Prophet. I have no problem considering him that.

[–]atomic1fireReagan Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If Christians recognize Muhammed as a prophet wouldn't that make him the first catholic sex abuse scandal?

On a more serious note the huffsomepaint post is not usually a place I get my news from because it's mostly blogs now. It sounds a lot like forbes now. And not even the good kind of content.

[–]Abakala [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'll recognize him as a false prophet. Does that count?

[–]legalizehazing [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm actually very very surprised this hasn't been a bigger thing sooner.

[–]booszhius [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

HuffPo needs to go learn some basic doctrine about Christianity...

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book."

Revelation 22:18 (KJV)

The Bible is complete and has everything in it needed to guide people through life. Just telling me that I need to accept parts of a bastardized agglomerated ideology that did not arrive until centuries after these words were written contravenes what I believe - never mind the ideas and concepts that are is contained within the pages of the Koran and other writings of Islam.

[–]princeimrahil [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

What did Christians do for the first several centuries before the canon was established?

[–]booszhius [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

They weren't engaged in jihad, that's for sure.

[–]princeimrahil [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I know. It was meant as a commentary on sola scriptura

[–]calabron69Jeffersonian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Only if we can officially recognize him as a pedophile first.

[–]cfmonkey45 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They're not wrong

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Matthew 7:15