上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 463

[–]jivatman [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

The most notable thing is the pretty dramatic breaking of the court's Harvard-Yale Duopoly, consistent with Scalia's final wishes! Two from Chicago and one from Michigan and one from Duke. So 7 "high-pedigree" types out of 11. 3 if you count only Yale and Chicago.

I'm ecstatic. Don't know who came up with this list for Trump but he deserves an ovation.

Stephen Colloton:Got his AB from Princeton and his law degree from Yale. Colloton was nominated to the Eighth Circuit by President George W. Bush on February 12, 2003. He was confirmed a vote of 94-1 by the Senate on September 4, 2003, and received his commission on September 10, 2003.

Allison Eid: Got her BA from Stanford and her law degree from the University of Chicago. She clerked for Justice Thomas and became a member of the Colorado SC in 2006. In 2007 she was retained by Colorado voters by a 75% margin.

Raymond Gruender: Received his BA and JD from Washington University in St. Louis. Was confirmed to the 8th Circuit in 2004 by a vote of 97-1. Based on his opinion in Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Rounds, I expect that he is likely pro-life, but if anyone wishes to correct me or add more info, feel free.

Thomas Hardiman: Received his BA from Notre Dame and his law degree from Georgetown University. He was confirmed to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007 by a vote of 95-0. Looks like he's a big "tough on crime" kind of guy from some of his opinions, as well as generally supportive of law enforcement over defendants. Also appears to be big on 1st and 2nd Amendment rights (except maybe when schools are involved). Again, feel free to correct or provide additional info if you have any.

Raymond Kethledge: Received his BA from Michigan in 1989, received his JD from the University of Michigan. Clerked for Justice Kennedy in 1997. His confirmation to the 6th Circuit was stalled for over a year by the two democratic senators from Michigan until Bush made a deal with them to appoint Helene White to the 6th Circuit as well. He was confirmed by a voice vote.

Joan Larsen: Received her JD from the Northwestern University of Law, where she graduated first in her class. Clerked for Scalia. She has been a professor at the University of Michigan School of Law since 1998, and was appointed to the Michigan Supreme Court by Governor Snyder in 2015. So far she seems to have the least impressive resume of any of the potential nominees Trump has listed.

Thomas Lee: Received his Bachelor's from BYU and his JD from the University of Chicago. He clerked for Justice Thomas. He was confirmed to the Utah SC in 2010, receiving a unanimous vote from the senate judiciary committee. His Wikipedia has multiple cases you can look at for which he has authored opinions and dissents.

William Pryor: Earned his BA from Northeast Louisiana University and his JD from Tulane Law School. He is currently a professor at the University of Alabama's Law School, as well as a member of the 11th Circuit. He was confirmed to the 11th Circuit in 2005 by an up-down vote of 53-45 after substantial negotiating between Republicans and Democrats. He has stated that Roe v Wade was "The worst abomination in the history of constitutional law", and his wiki has several notable opinions.

David Stras: Received his BA and JD from the University of Kansas. He was appointed to the Minnesota SC in 2010 by Governor Pawlenty.

Diane Sykes: Received her BS from Northwestern University and her JD from Marquette University Law School. She served on the Wisconsin SC from 1999 until her appointment to the 7th Circuit in 2004. The vote for her confirmation was 70-27. She has multiple opinions on her wiki you can look through.

Don Willett: Received a triple-major BBA (economics, finance, public administration) from Baylor University and his JD from Duke University. He was appointed to the Texas SC in 2005, elected in 2006, and re-elected in 2012, though he was the only one of 5 incumbent justices who faced opposition for his seat. His opinions can be found here.

[–]ecfreeman [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This is a game changer for me honestly. I was very VERY concerned about Trump being the nominee, but if this is his list of potential nominees for SCOTUS and he means it and holds to it, he may earn my vote. Time will tell though.

[–]presidenttrump_2016 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Trump himself isn't a policy expert, but he knows how to hire people who are. He has some serious talent on his team.

[–]FuriousChef [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Upvotes and kudos for you. You did a much better job reporting these picks than ABC news.

[–]Triepo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Heritage foundation came up with much of the list, if not all.

[–]uberpowerLibertarian Conservative Traditionalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm ecstatic. Don't know who came up with this list for Trump but he deserves an ovation.

[–]abd9344 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I love that the list is weighted towards non-Harvard/Yale people, it is a bit ridiculous that every single Justice is from either Yale or Harvard, that just screams elitism & quasi-nepotism and isn't possibly justifiable on the basis of qualification alone (Law students at Harvard are not of any different tier than those from 20+ other top schools).

[–]Seven-Three [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Sure. Just don't tell the Harvard students that...

[–]MuricaLite [スコア非表示]  (45子コメント)

I will be eager to see what everyone here thinks about this.

It is understandable that this sub could have disagreements with Trump. But this is a genuine gesture to give conservatives exactly what they want on this issue. It is a strong move to unite the party.

[–]JibrishRepublican [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

All I can tell so far is that they are mostly justices at a state level under or appointed by Bush. Nothing is really popping out at me. Probably a good list at a glance but needs vetting.

[–]timmyjj2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

A lot of these people are state Supreme Court Justices that were appointed by Governors.

[–]Roez [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

The catch is Trump needs to fight for his justices. There are plenty of examples during my life where Presidential appointments didn't get through. In fact, I would say the majority didn't if you go back at least 50 years (I might be wrong, but several were shot down at least).

These picks aren't guarantees. Is Trump going to start with this list then compromise later, or stick to his list no matter what? I'll assume these people have been approached and are open to taking an appointment.

[–]Curious__George [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Is it realistic to think that Trump will win the election but the GOP will lose control of the Senate? Because otherwise I don't think it will be particularly contenious.

[–]BigBeautifulCoat [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"I am going to give a list of either five or 10 judges that I will pick, 100 percent pick, that I will put in for nomination. Because some of the people that are against me say: 'We don't know if he's going to pick the right judge. Supposing he picks a liberal judge or supposing he picks a pro-choice judge,'" Trump said at an event in Palm Beach, Florida.

[–]MuricaLite [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

This is a fair point.

He should provide some additional clarity on his intent for what he will do when he runs in to resistance.

[–]jivatman [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Lol, no. Absolutely nothing to gain by saying that and will lose lots of Conservatives who would see it as already betraying them.

[–]MuricaLite [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If he says "I'd prefer to go from this list, but anything is negotiable.", sure that would hurt him.

But if he reinforces his point and says he will only pick someone on the list, that reinforces his position.

[–]posidonius_of_rhodes [スコア非表示]  (25子コメント)

This reeks of trying to appeal to conservative voters, but if he sticks to it, starts staying consistent, and doesn't pull back and say it's all negotiable, he's won big points with me.

[–]Laneofhighhopes [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This reeks of trying to appeal to conservative voters

This is exactly why he released them. He is not trying to hide that fact.

[–]mostlyharmless26 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Question is will he stick to this list when the winds change

[–]PM_ME_UR_TRUMP_MEMES [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

That's why he released them. Many conservatives were worried about SCOTUS nominees, so he released a list of nominees he believes would be a good fit for the job.

[–]RedditJusticeWarrior [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This reeks of trying to appeal to conservative voters, but if he sticks to it, stays consistent, and doesn't pull back and say it's all negotiable, he's won big points with me.

Soooo wait...

The Cruz crew has been very upset, saying that he'll nom liberal judges to the court. He has said he will only pick from the short list and releases a list MUH TRUE CONSERVATISM people can like.

OF COURSE he's trying to ameliorate concerns from the far right that he'll be conservative in his picks. He's TRYING to reach out and show he's not going to put liberals on the court.

Is there ANY winning?

More to the point though I guess if you just think he's a big meanie liar then there's no believing the list anyway.

[–]senorhotpants [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

At this point, Trump could literally save their children from a burning building and they'd reply, "well, he probably started the fire in the first place."

[–]AceOfSpades70Libertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

stays consistent,

When is he ever consistent?

[–]HOT_HAM_H20 [スコア非表示]  (17子コメント)

I prefer this to a tax return.

[–]Laneofhighhopes [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

Same.

A tax return isn't going to say much except that he tries to pay minimal taxes.

This release might be huge in winning over conservative voters.

[–]scb1015 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

And he already said he tries to pay minimal taxes so it won't even be new news.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

If Hillary tried to bash Trump for paying low taxes, Trump would just brag about it and say how good he is at running a business and that he wants to run the country just as good.

[–]gbimmer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

....and he can probably say he paid more money than her regardless.

[–]KennesawMtnLandis [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Why? This is an actual function of his office but you'd rather know about something that isn't? There is truly no pleasing #NeverTrump.

[–]CrashOverride_ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He says he prefers the list over the tax return. I think you misread.

[–]varemia [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think you might be misreading his statement. He said he prefers the list of Supreme Court picks over the pointless tax return info.

[–]VowOfKsitigarbha [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

These are great, young and energetic conservative people. If Trump win in November and these people take the Supreme Court, the leftists are fucked.

[–]Roez [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

You may have answered your own question. During my life most conservative justices (maybe half at least) haven't actually made it through confirmation. Unless the Senate rules have changed, even a minority party can block a confirmation.

A list is a great start, but Trump should fill in around the edges. Will he stick to his list no matter what? Will he compromise if one or two of them doesn't get confirmed?

[–]richardguyBIBLE HELD HIGH. YOU OTHER BROTHERS CAN'T DENY. [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Say they block even five or six of them, which would take a while, it's not like they can stop eleven different picks for four years straight. How long before Trump gets up on the bully pulpit and says "vote these guys out in 2018"?

[–]UpvoteRocketsForAll [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

He will do it over Twitter; and he can because he is Donald!

[–]richardguyBIBLE HELD HIGH. YOU OTHER BROTHERS CAN'T DENY. [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

he probably would lol

[–]Laneofhighhopes [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

What does everyone think? I am unfamiliar with the names,but the goal was for them to be conservative.

[–]IBurnKorans [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

They all are

[–]BaeWhyYouPlease Unify [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Well now that Trump picked them, they're clearly all Communist liberals that Hillary paid him to list.

[–]IBurnKorans [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

There are morons that believe this sadly, we gotta unify like your flair says

[–]HOT_HAM_H20 [スコア非表示]  (182子コメント)

I honestly believe that once vetted, this will end the "never trump" movement. Of all the things that a president can do, this will have the most lasting impact. NEVER HILLARY

[–]nicodemus13 [スコア非表示]  (117子コメント)

It won't do it, because the people involved in the NeverTrump movement aren't actually conservatives. They're neocon globalists, which is why they would rather have Hillary as President over Trump.

[–]e12012012 [スコア非表示]  (64子コメント)

Thank you. This is exactly what they are. How in the world are you a "principled conservative" voting for the open borders Libertarian party? Please. They're just petulant at this point if this does not sway them. I have plenty of disagreements with Trump but don't act like Hillary Clinton wouldn't devastate this country.

[–]vox_libertatis#NeverTrump [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Uh...what? I'm a constitutionalist. This is a pretty list, but precisely nothing Trump has done so far warrants me putting any faith in him suddenly become honest. He's already said everything he says is just a "suggestion" and part of a negotiation. The notion that he'll magically become consistent and become a principled constitutionalist is laughable.

[–]nicodemus13 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Well I guess there's not much more he can do to win you over then, is there? We'll see what happens in January.

[–]Wally_Wallnuts [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Not even worth the effort tbh. The nevertrumpers are insignicant. Whiners gonna whine.

[–]OneBeez [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Or advocate for someone like Mitt Romney

[–]nicodemus13 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Who is less conservative than Trump - which is why the whole NeverTrump movement is bullshit.

[–]AceOfSpades70Libertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Who is less conservative than Trump

Based on what? How are any of Trump's plans conservative? Note argue about his plans, not his goals.

[–]PumaplayssdReagan was best [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Get your mouth cleaned, Poop is full of E. Coli

[–]Dunebridge [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. I am a conservative and neither a neocon nor a globalist and I am firmly #NeverTrump now and forever. Trump is a dangerous fool unfit for the office. A good list of conservative justice candidates (which this is) means nothing for two reasons:

1) Trump lies. It is who he is, it is in his nature.

2) It's hard to get jazzed about the supreme court when a thin-skinned moron with a hair trigger has nuclear codes.

[–]pittguy578 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You aren't making sense here. Trump doesn't like war. Who would he nuke? Russia who he wants to build a relationship with ? Only two states might need to be nuked. NK and Iran and that would only be if they were going to launch a rogue attack and any President would do that

[–]Dunebridge [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Excellent questions.

1) You say Trump doesn't like war, he even says it too. Hooray! How many leaders say they like war? None. And yet we end up in wars large and small, some that are necessary and some not so much. Liking war or not is not an indicator of whether someone will get us involved in a war.

2) Who would we nuke? I don't know. But four years is a long time. We can only guess what sort of crisis might come up between now and January 2021. Since we don't know the exact circumstances of the next crisis we have to judge the character and actions of the person who will be making decisions about war and peace for us. More about this below.

3) No state "needs to be nuked." US policy has been to maintain an implicit threat of nukes as a response but never having to actually use them. Let's keep it that way.

So back to character. Trump has not help elective office so it's hard to judge his actions in an apples to apples way to being President. To be fair, nobody running for President has been President so the same could be said of all candidates. But we can make guesses about how Trump would react to a crisis situation by looking at how he carries himself and how that reveals his character.

Trump has shown himself to be thin skinned. He has trouble letting things go. Presidents tend to get criticized. Trump doesn't handle that well. That's not good.

Trump has also shown himself to be easily bothered by what most would consider minor slights (stubby fingers?). He blusters, he threatens, he lashes out, and he never forgets. He has already threatened to open up the libel laws, sic the justice department on Jeff Bezos, and go after people funding his opponents. That's just domestic.

What's he gonna do when some tin pot dictator decides to take a verbal run at him to boost his own domestic standing? I shudder.

You can say it's all an act, that he'll change in office. But if it's an act, he's been acting his whole adult life. We have no excuse for overlooking the decades long pattern of juvenile behavior from Trump.

[–]CarolinaPunk#NEVERTRUMP [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Nope. It's a question of his character and temperament. Not one of what he will do to appease us.

[–]HOT_HAM_H20 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

At this moment, our country is standing on the precipice. You are welcome to stand on your principles, but I will be on the right side of history.

[–]CarolinaPunk#NEVERTRUMP [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I will be on the right side of history.

There is no right side of history, Obama.

[–]GuitarWizard90 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

The NeverTrump movement was never much of a thing anyway. It seems to be limited to a few talking heads on TV, and internet forums such as this one. I don't see it much at all in real life. Anyone I've encountered in person who is NeverTrump, are leftists who hate his immigration policies and Muslim ban.

[–]chillenchillada [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Then you have no need to convert us. You're sure to win without our help, no need to feel insecure!

[–]GuitarWizard90 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm certainly not going to spend much energy trying to convert you. The Supreme Court is probably the most important part of the coming election. If you still refuse to vote for Trump, even after him picking conservative SC justices...then you were never going to change your mind to begin with. It's a free country, so vote for whoever you want. I'm just saying I'm not seeing many of you guys at all in real life.

[–]HOT_HAM_H20 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I have never encountered a never trump myself, and I live in a conservative stronghold. You may be on to something.

[–]GuitarWizard90 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I live in the middle of the Appalachian mountains, surrounded by some of the most hardcore right-wing people you could ever imagine. Everybody here is on the Trump train. Like I said, the only NeverTrump people I've encountered were leftists.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (34子コメント)

For the most part these are CONSERVATIVE names.

People that where spewing BS saying he'd nominate his sister to SCOTUS need to take a step back and realize Trump is on your team (you know who you are).

I am a bit surprised, considering Trump is indeed a showman, that Ted Cruz isn't on this list. It would have made a pretty big impact if he did. But these judges on here are indeed staunch Scalia grade Conservative judges. Not liberals like "Never Trump" people where yelling he would do.

[–]powest02 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I love Cruz, but there is no way he would make it through the Senate confirmation.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

He may have...if it's the only way to keep him out of the Senate! LOL

[–]SECAggieGuy14 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's funny you should say that! I was just discussing Cruz and SCOTUS the other day and they said that exact same thing!! Lol, that'd be both hilarious (on the Senate's part) and awesome (for the sake of SCOTUS)

[–]Odinsama [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

He never said that he would by the way, when asked he said she would be great but he would never appoint her because there is a conflict of interest.

Now some may say "why would he say his pro abortion sister would be great if he isn't going to appoint someone liberal?"

And the answer to that is he likes his sister and that's why he praises her. If you watch Donald Trump for a while you'll notice he always says nice things about his friends and family, because he is a loyal guy.

[–]sweetcornwolf [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

Only shills or morons ever believed he was honestly going to nominate his sister.

[–]jivatman [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Still a lot of bad blood between the two. Cruz could have snapped back and said he wouldn't even accept, or just made some sort of other general anti-Trump comments and it would have hurt him.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

For Trump, bad press is good press.

"The Art of the Deal" kind of highlights this.

It all depends where the bad press comes from, and then the bad press will also include good press.

[–]jivatman [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Not always. Did you watch the Megyn Kelly interview yesterday? He says a bunch of things he did, like the Heidi Cruz tweet, that he wishes he hadn't have done.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

It's easy to say that after you've locked up the nomination though.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Personally I don't think Cruz would be a good choice. First and foremost, because he has no experience as a judge. Secondly because choosing him would take him out of the Senate, and we need as many vocal Conservatives in Congress as possible.

[–]presidenttrump_2016 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I am a bit surprised, considering Trump is indeed a showman, that Ted Cruz isn't on this list.

I am not. Nominating Cruz would have dominated the story, making none of the other nominations matter and brought the Trump/Cruz feuds back into the media.

[–]JumpyPorcupine [スコア非表示]  (36子コメント)

Didn't Cruz say Trump would pick a pro-abortion liberal?

[–]Talk_with_a_lithp [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

I guess he... You know... Lied.

[–]Countdown216#NeverHillary [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Lyin' Ted. That's what I call him.

[–]mm1255 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How is it a lie to speculate about somebody's pick that hasn't even happened yet? There isn't even a fact to be lying about at that point.

[–]AceOfSpades70Libertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How did he lie? Has Trump nominated anyone yet?

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

I mean they don't call him "Lyin' Ted Cruz" because he biblically lies with different women...right?

[–]posidonius_of_rhodes [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Unlike Trump, who actually did sleep with other women, and divorced several times.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Well, that's arguable and Trump never denied it.

[–]posidonius_of_rhodes [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

You think it's arguable that Trump cheated on his wives?

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

No, it's arguable that Ted didn't.

Trump's owned up to whatever he's gone through.

He was indeed a known playboy.

The difference is he doesn't thump on a bible and speak like a televangelist whenever he talks.

Not a slam on Cruz, honestly, just that THAT is why if Cruz cheated on his wife it makes a bigger difference.

[–]posidonius_of_rhodes [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's a pretty big if. Most of the women denied it, and as far as I know no substantial evidence has come out. The story pretty much disappeared once Cruz started losing

[–]friendlyfire [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Cruz didn't sue the NE.

Honestly? There is a high bar for libel. I'm aware of that. But a serious accusation like this against one of the only Republican nominees with a fighting chance at that point had provable damages to his reputation. As you can see, some people obviously believe it.

It was also done by the same guy who spilled the beans on Edwards, which turned out to be true.

Did he sleep with all 5 of those women? Probably not.

But did he sleep with at least 1?

I'm guessing probably.

Edit: Obviously, this is pure conjecture and I admit that.

[–]___ok [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That was just speculation based on his previous comments about his sister. Until he actually gets in and makes a decision, there really is no telling who he would nominate, other than going by his values and his word on the second amendment and other issues. Some of that is shaky in my opinion.

Getting his team to create a list doesn't actually convince me he would go by it until he demonstrates he knows why these might be good picks and what is at stake. He would do well to talk about the constitution beyond "I love the second amendment".

[–]exigence [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Technically Trump hasn't picked somebody yet and you can't lie about something that hasn't happened yet. That's called being incorrect, not lying. Even then, you'd have to show that at the time Cruz made the statement, Trump wasn't wanting to pick a pro-abortion liberal.

Also, I would also think that somebody who is pro-Trump, a man who has stated that you say things for negotiation purposes, could appreciate Cruz putting pressure on Trump to nominate a real conservative via this method.

[–]JobieWanKenobi [スコア非表示]  (21子コメント)

It should be a requirement that all candidates do this

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

We all know that Hillary would actually consider putting Barack Obama (or someone like him) on her list. There's anyone's motivation on this sub to vote for Trump over her.

[–]z64dan [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

Obama would hate being on the Supreme Court.

You actually have to show up to work and do stuff.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He would love it because it would give him ultimate power over some very major issues.

[–]CAPSLOCK44 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Nah, you can just not listen to anything anybody says and blindly vote for the most liberal stance on everything, so that true justice can be served!

[–]wolf_sang [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

You mean like Clarence Thomas that has spoken once in the past decade?

[–]KennesawMtnLandis [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

USSC justices supported his lack of talking and admitted that they had their opinions formed before ever hearing arguments in the courtroom.

[–]benjammin29 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Go read an opinion written by Clarence Thomas, Any opinion, and then come back and tell me that he needed to ask a question of the lawyers presenting oral arguments to have a firm understanding of the law.

[–]wolf_sang [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Im no saying Thomas isn't a well respected and intelligent judge, but that the poster I responded to basically imagined a liberal Thomas.

[–]ultimisConstitutionalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You do realize that most talking is theatrics right? The two sides of a case write up extensive briefs that the justices already read. Occasionally justices use this time to clarify a question they have on some issue.

[–]brettpilkington07#HamiltonRule [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

You are right. Obama wants to be done being president so he can go golfing more. More than he already does, even.

[–]orangebloodGoldwater Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah, Obama is about to go make half a billion on corporate boards and the speaking circuit.

[–]GS91 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Once Obama was on the court he'd try to pass a decision to make US an Islamic country.

[–]GS91 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Agreed. Trump is already making elections great again.

[–]uberpowerLibertarian Conservative Traditionalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Only one candidate is smart enough to push past the sale and get the media talking about who President Trump would appoint. The other candidates are too scared of choosing guys too far left, or right, or whatever, and afraid of negative media and negative poll impact. They're glued to the internal polling while Trump strolls into the Oval Office in a landslide election.

[–]lesserlife7 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

The founding fathers could rise from their graves to endorse Trump and these NeverTrumpers would STILL not support him. Just butthurt because Trump bested the chosen one, standard bearer of the Priesthood Rising, Ted Cruz.

[–]usernameimgur [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I think that the biggest story of this release is that Charlie Sykes' wife, Diane is on the list. When Trump called in to Charlie's program before the Wisconsin Primary he wasn't aware that she is Charlie's wife. Even though Sykes is part of the Never Trump brain trust which ultimately led to him losing Wisconsin, she still is on the list.

[–]PatrioticPomegranate [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's great that Trump puts the well-being of our nation ahead of petty squabbles.

[–]presidenttrump_2016 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

One of those picks was anti-Trump(the Texas judge).

[–]richardguyBIBLE HELD HIGH. YOU OTHER BROTHERS CAN'T DENY. [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Wisconsin guy too. Pryor I think.

[–]JumpyPorcupine [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Liberals pick conservative judges! It's common knowledge! /s

[–]JibrishRepublican [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

The common thing seems to be justices for states under the Bush administration.

I can't say I'm familiar with any of the names at a glance.

[–]lesserlife7 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Umm...Bush was the last Republican president in the last quarter century. Of course they were appointed by him

[–]pearlofsandwichBusiness Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Can't go nominating old farts to a lifetime position.

[–]stupidaccountname [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

The easiest way to research how good they are is to see how badly the lefty blogs are melting down in an hour or two.

[–]CamBamThankYouMamm [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They are probably in full meltdown mode right now. MSNBC is probably melting like a popsicle on a hot summer day.

[–]z64dan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well, they are all white, so it's like Trump is doing their work for them.

[–]stupidestpuppy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well, the left was outraged when Souter was nominated, and we all know how that turned out.

[–]yep45Constitutionalist [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

That would be nice if a President Trump nominated one of the conservatives he named. At the risk of sounding obdurate however, he's gonna have to name a whole cabinet of competent people to make his candidacy less dangerous. And convince people that he's actually going to follow through on his picks too.

[–]GuitarWizard90 [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

But this sub assured me that Trump would pick "fellow liberals" for the SC...

[–]RedditJusticeWarrior [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Well Ben Shaprio is screaming that the list is meaningless because Trump is a liar and "clearly" Trump doesn't know any of the names on the list.

In other words the MUH TRUE CONSERVATISM people refuse to actually listen and will never be convinced.

[–]No_stop_signs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Ben Shapiro screeches about everything, even when clearly contradicted by evidence. Don't worry about him.

[–]vox_libertatis#NeverTrump [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

We are listening. That's why we don't trust your god king. He's flip-flopped on position after position, once in a nationally televised debate for christsake. Why should we trust him? What possible reason do we have to put faith in Trump magically finding principles that he won't throw away for a 1 point gain in the polls?

[–]No_stop_signs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The possible reason is the fact Clinton will do exactly the same thing, but she definitely will put liberal "interpret the constitution with muh fee fees" justices in the SCOTUS, and she will definitely come to take your guns, and after that likely start limiting free speech when it applies to hurt fee fees or things that cause muslims to explode.

[–]This-Is-My-Moment [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

He literally copied the list from the heritage foundation and Trump has made his word absolutely worthless with how often he changes positions

[–]BigBeautifulCoat [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Copied the list? He literally delegated the task to them, presumably to make sure the picks would be trusted by fools like you. Little does he know that it makes no difference to you what he does; you've already made up your mind about him.

[–]PoliteAsFuc [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Going to be perfectly honest here. From my history on this sub you can know I am as anti Trump as anyone. However this list here is something that gives me hope. I have done some soul searching in the last couple weeks and realized it was Trump Supporters not Trump himself that turned me sour on him. The abusiveness and aggressive approach to debating are a huge turn off. I will continue to have my doubts about Trump until He shows me some more, this is a good first step. To his supporters I would say, shut up. You are not helping.

[–]vox_libertatis#NeverTrump [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Don't trust him to follow through at all. He's already said everything so far is "just a suggestion." Why the hell would he magically find some honesty now?

[–]No_stop_signs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"So I'd better vote for Hillary instead." -- True conservative

[–]nowthatsrich [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why is a pic of Bernie Sanders i my face when I open an article about Trump?

[–]uberpowerLibertarian Conservative Traditionalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Unite the base now.

[–]Dunebridge [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Trump releases a list of 11 judges about whom he knows nothing and cares even less and suddenly some so-called conservatives are willing to drink the Kool-Aid.

This is how it happens. This is how conservatism dies. This is how conservatism goes European and becomes about identity politics and SJW crap just for different people. Hell no.

Conservatism is about rule of law first. Trump cares NOTHING for rule of law, only rule of Trump. He has made it repeatedly clear that laws are not something he will concern himself with. "But hey he's wearing my team's jersey so I better cheer for him." Hell no.