全 9 件のコメント

[–]georgeguy007"Wigs lead to world domination" - Jared Diamon 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Context? Never believe a written line that just says "X person wanted Y because he said 'random quote out of context'". Every quote should come with when it was said, why it was said, and who it was said to.

[–]lestrigone 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

X person wanted Y because he said 'random quote out of context'

This should've been a template in that other Wondering Wednesday.

[–]Piconeeks 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Be skeptical of anything that seems 'just-so'.

It's a difficult adjective to describe, but the closest I can come to a definition is 'conveniently easy to digest'. Sociologists are hardly able to describe today's culture—how well do you think we could ever understand the nuances of past events? Always look for historians that provide counterclaims to their own theories and downplay the effects of their discoveries, because then you know you're getting the whole picture and not some editorialized scrap.

[–]GobtheCyberPunkStuart, Ewell, and Pickett did the Gettysburg Screwjob 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Perhaps the word you're looking for is "facile"?

[–]TipTupKek 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hate this so much. Any time someone in history leads into a statement with "and of course," you know it 'aint so.

[–]TipTupKek 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

What are some questions you should ask yourself when reading anything about history?

What is the author's intent or 'end-goal' for this book, and how might s/he be constructing it in order to achieve that?

What do you tell yourself to keep yourself on your toes?

What is my intent or 'end-goal' for reading this book, and how might I be reading it in order to achieve that?

Most historians do the first, not so many do the latter. It's incredibly important to at least try and understand how our own readings of history are shaped by what we know, what we would like to know, and what we would like to do.

Oh, and

What should people look for in a well made book?

Cool glossy color pictures on those pages in the middle.

[–]BreaksFullUnrepentant Carlinboo 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Ask yourself what you would have done, or what they should have done differently in their situation. Try to put yourself in the mindset of the people you're reading about when you're thinking about judging them. A lot of things people have done in history that we judge as immoral and they as terrible people become a lot more nuanced. It's easy to just dismiss McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare as paranoid, unconstitutional, wrong, but it's valuable to understand that such men were legitimately terrified that a very real and actively hostile power was working to undermine them, and how would you react if you genuinely felt the country you cared for was in danger of being destroyed from the inside?

Not to say such actions were morally right, but it's easy to judge people from the past who made their decisions under pressure and in situations we can't comprehend, and we should try and at least understand why they did what they did before we throw them under the bus.

[–]JFVarletThe Phantom Time Hypothesis never happened. Wait, what..... 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's easy to just dismiss McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare as paranoid, unconstitutional, wrong, but it's valuable to understand that such men were legitimately terrified that a very real and actively hostile power was working to undermine them, and how would you react if you genuinely felt the country you cared for was in danger of being destroyed from the inside?

As a more broad expansion of this, just be generally aware that explanation is not justification. Trying to rationally understand why someone committed such an evil act is not saying that evil act is completely forgivable. The classic example of this is Holocaust studies, where several times academics advancing various functionalist interpretations of the Holocaust have been attacked (generally by political pundits and journalists who know far less about the topic) for supposedly being Nazi apologists or defenders.

[–]BreaksFullUnrepentant Carlinboo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh most certainly. I just feel it's best to have the context before people judge history so offhand. I can't say that the Allied strategic bombing in WWII was morally right, it was a horrible thing to do morally, but given their knowledge at the time and the situation they were in, I also can't really condemn them for choosing what looked like the least-horrible option at the time.