39
40

FACEBOOKVigilante SJWs (imgur.com)

BrowsinBadger が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]MasterRedx<-- Shitlord [スコア非表示]  (39子コメント)

Beating the shit out of a rapist is alright by me. Decapitation of a rapist and parading his head is psychopathic.

[–]mogwaitoothbrush [スコア非表示]  (28子コメント)

What's your address then? I need beat the shit out of you for that time you raped me.

See the problem with this story now?

[–]PC_Chikatilo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I believe. See more of a problem now? ^ ^ ^

[–]MasterRedx<-- Shitlord [スコア非表示]  (17子コメント)

I never said I belived her. I'm talking about the situation of someone raping someone else, as in forcing her to have sex with him against her will, I believe in that exact situation that it's alright if she beats the hell out of him. I'm not saying I condone whatever the girl in the post is doing because I don't know the story, i'm saying it's alright if a situation like the one I stated came up.

[–]mogwaitoothbrush [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

Your hypothetical situation has nothing to do with this story then.

Fighting back against a rapist while he is attacking someone is not the same as premeditated breaking and entering/ assault/ battery/attempted murder after the fact. Committing a crime is not dispensing justice.

[–]GoldenWizard [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

There's no evidence for this POV so why would you assume she's lying?

[–]mogwaitoothbrush [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Have you ever heard of the principle "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"?

She is not a judge, she is not a jury, and she is not an executioner.

What she did was not within her rights and she admittedly infringed upon the rights of another human being. That makes her a criminal. This guy hasn't admitted any crime and has not been convicted of any crime. He is to be presumed innocent until it is proven otherwise in a court of law.

[–]GingerIceCube [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

^ Thank you.

[–]GoldenWizard [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

I understand but provided that neither of them were being prosecuted at the time of the post, those courtroom ideals don't apply. To avoid speculation and jumping to conclusions I was just going off of the information from the post. You have to be really careful speculating in situations like this, especially when we don't have all the information. You're on as much of a slippery slope as your typical SJW.

[–]mogwaitoothbrush [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You are defining me "NOT" assuming that she is telling the truth as "Speculating and jumping to conclusions." There is no reason to assume she is telling the truth so I'm NOT ASSUMING THAT. See how that works?

She admitted to committing a crime and is trying to justify her actions by claiming her victim committed a crime. There is no evidence to support her claims.

If I accused you of raping me, should everyone else believe me? If everyone shouldn't just believe my claims, then why should everyone just believe hers?

[–]Marinade73Cockmagi-kin [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

So you're fine with someone beating you up because someone said you did something wrong with no other proof?

[–]GoldenWizard [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

You're clearly not reading what I'm saying... If that's the case do whatever you want but IN THIS SCENARIO the ONLY information were given is that a rape occurred and she got revenge. Given that information, my opinion is that it's justified. Downvote or disagree all you want but that's my opinion and it's based on only the provided info, so don't tell me I'm wrong when you don't know the full story either.

[–]Marinade73Cockmagi-kin [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

No we don't even have that information. We have a claim that a rape occurred. A claim that is coming from someone who just used it as an excuse to justify assault. So not a very reliable one and one with no proof.

[–]GoldenWizard [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Do you think the majority of women that claim they were raped are lying or telling the truth?

[–]StealthRR [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

You dont even know it was rape though. Youre just going off this, yes, psychopaths word that he raped her. Thats what the justice system is there for, to prove it happened and then punish the attacker. Getting 3 people to believe you and then planning on attacking him, that is psychotic.

[–]MasterRedx<-- Shitlord [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

I'm just saying, in the situation of someone raping someone else, I feel it's completely justifiable to beat the hell out if them. I don't know the whole story, but as long as they're sane enough not to muder him I think it's alright.

[–]janiceian1983Social Janice Warrior [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

But how do you know it was rape?

And if you are the victim and do the beating, how do you convince the cops that you were raped AFTER you seemingly assault some random dude?

[–]mogwaitoothbrush [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He's an idiot, so don't bother with him.

He thinks that claiming victim status gives you the right to victimize others. He's basically a textbook tumblrina.

[–]MasterRedx<-- Shitlord [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

That isn't what i'm talking about. If its indisputable, and the person was raped, I would turn a blind eye to that person wanting revenge. Whatever happens afterward is the victims problem, they should have expected to have the cops called on them.

[–]StealthRR [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

You dont know shes sane enough to not murder him though. Planning a home invasion and beating someone up, with 4 people to 1 is no longer a crime of passion, its premeditated. And you dont know if her intentions are to murder him or not or worse. And this is all assuming she was actually raped in the first place. What proof did these 3 guys have? None. And thats the thing youre wanting to ignore for the sake of vigilante justice. Thats the WHOLE point of calling the cops and getting this guy arrested, taking him to court to PROVE it. Which even then, if he didnt do it, the odds are still highly stacked against him.

[–]FeelsOfSteelM'shitlady [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Which even then, if he didnt do it, the odds are still highly stacked against him.

And the redpiller reveals itself.

[–]Tmick_wtg [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Rounding up a posse and beating your enemies to death is absolutely the default human method of conflict resolution. People have done that in every continent for ten thousand years. It's not a clinical abnormality, it's what everyone has always done.

Doesn't make it good or productive or adaptive, but it is definitely not a psychological defect. If anything, waiting for the law to handle things is the abnormal state of human psych.

[–]TotesMessengerPronoun: "Totes" [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)