Sponsored links

JudgyBitch

The radical notion that women are adults

Do some women benefit from being slapped around? @Gavin_McInnes wants to know.

On Monday, I was on the Gavin McInnes Show, which is hosted on the subscribers only Anthony Cumia network, so Gavin can pretty much say any damn thing he likes. It’s fun being on his show. I rucked up the $8/mo fee, and subscribed, and I was listening to the show yesterday when Gavin asked an interesting question: are there women who might benefit from being slapped on occasion? He played a video clip of a song with the lyrics ‘he hit me and it felt like a kiss’ by the Crystals. Lana del Rey updated the song, calling it ‘Ultraviolence’.
Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video playback.
Get the latest Flash Player
Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser
Let me preface this column by saying my husband has never hit me in any context that wasn’t erotic and consensual. Tim has never made a move that even threatened or suggested he might be violent, but thinking about Gavin’s question made me realize that even though my husband has never, ever acted aggressively towards me in that way, I very much assume that he would, and further, that in certain situations, he should.
There are all kinds of reasons I don’t cheat on my husband, but an important one is that I assume he would beat the shit out of me if I ever did. And I would bloody well deserve it. There is an important distinction to be made between whether one should hit women versus do women ever deserve to be hit? Those are two entirely different questions. Let’s take the latter first. Do women ever ask for it?
Hell yeah. Bill Burr has a great skit about it:
Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video playback.
Get the latest Flash Player
Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser
I think about it like this: if I walk up to US Marine, throw the American flag at his feet and wipe my dirty boots off on it, I deserve to be punched in the mouth. Yes, it should be legal for me to do that. I don’t want to see free speech limited by rules around how you treat important symbols, but at the same time, I understand that wiping my boots on the Stars and Stripes in front of someone who has pledged his life to defend the freedom the flag represents is profoundly disrespectful, and deserving of complete and utter contempt, including a smack in the face.
Should it be legal to punch someone wiping their feet on a flag? No. If punching flag abusers was legal, that would effectively make abusing the flag (or any other symbol) illegal, because few people are going to engage in speech that guarantees they’re gonna get punched in the face. It should be a mitigating factor when it comes to meting out punishment, for certain. But it should not be legal to assault people, no matter how disrespectful they happen to be. It’s not illegal to be an asshole, nor should it be.
Let’s go back to the hitting women issue. There are many things I would simply never dream of doing to my husband, because I assume I would get a slap or worse, if I did. All of those things are linked to respect. To be clear: all of this comes from me. Tim has never said “Don’t ever think of doing x because I will hit you.” That has never happened. I just feel that he would, and he would be perfectly justified in doing so. There are a multitude of reasons I wouldn’t be disrespectful of my husband, especially in public. The possibility of taking a well-earned beating just happens to be one of them. It’s not even the most important reason, but it is a reason.
Fortunately, I am not a person who lives on drama and adrenaline, so I don’t go around inviting my husband to slap me by screaming at him in public or humiliating him by flirting with other men. But lots of women do. How much of domestic violence is caused by women pushing men into hitting them because that level of domination is familiar, and in a fucked up way, deeply erotic for the women?
Look at the lyrics to the Lana del Rey song – it’s exactly what she is talking about:
He used to call me DN
That stood for deadly nightshade
Cause I was filled with poison
But blessed with beauty and rage
Jim told me that
He hit me and it felt like a kiss
Jim brought me back
Reminded me of when we were kids
With his ultraviolence
Ultraviolence
Ultraviolence
Ultraviolence
I can hear sirens, sirens
He hit me and it felt like a kiss
I can hear violins, violins
Give me all of that ultraviolence
He used to call me poison
Like I was poison ivy
I could have died right there
Cause he was right beside me
Jim raised me up
He hurt me but it felt like true love
Jim taught me that
Loving him was never enough
Stephen Smith of ESPN got himself in a ton of hot water when he commented that women can and often do provoke men into violence. It’s not politically correct to say that, but I believe most women are exactly like me: they know precisely what they would have to do to provoke a violent response from their man. The choice is then relatively straight forward: do that thing and get hit, or don’t do that thing, and never get hit.
For lots of women, submission to a violent man is a bonding experience. A profound one. There are whole communities dedicated to ‘spanking your wife’ techniques. Most of these communities are pretty specific on the consensual aspects (don’t hit your wife if she doesn’t like it), but it’s incontrovertible that many women find violence erotic and even comforting. How many women feel this way, but have no way to articulate it, and thus end up provoking violence that can easily get out of hand?
Gavin wants to know why we can’t talk about women who might actually benefit from getting slapped every once and again. I’d kind of like to know, too, not just for the sake of titillation, but because being unwilling to talk about women who do indeed derive physical and emotional benefits from violence is dangerous. It’s dangerous for the women, who may provoke more violence and anger than they intend, and thus end up getting really hurt, and it’s dangerous for the men, who might carry out that violence, well beyond what is beneficial or wanted.
The solution is not to say ‘don’t hit women ever’. Women are adults, and they are allowed to like sexual domination and being spanked or hit by men. They are allowed to be fucked up drama queens who demand to be taken in hand violently. They are allowed to crave leadership, boundaries and enforcement. The key is to discuss it openly, and to understand provocation as a mitigating factor when the drama queen tries to use the violence she provoked to punish the man who has now disappointed her in some way.
Should it be legal to hit women? No. Should provocation be a mitigating factor? YES! Even to the point that provocation results in dismissed charges. Male violence towards women in intimate relationships is not nearly as straightforward as feminists and the law like to pretend it is. Women absolutely provoke violence from men, and I defy anyone to show me a woman who doesn’t understand what will push her man over the edge.
We know.
Most of us prefer to not cross the line, unless it’s in an explicitly erotic context. Women without the vocabulary or assumed authority to express their desires will still attempt to derive the benefits of male violence by provoking it. Deliberately. We could make that a safer experience for both men and women by talking about it.
Yes, Gavin, some women do benefit from being slapped around. Some women crave it. The truly frightening thing might be just how many women.
Lots of love,
JB
 
 
 
 

Sponsored links

We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
Avatar
Join the discussion…

  • in this conversation
⬇ Drag and drop your images here to upload them.
        Media preview placeholder
        Log in with
        or sign up with Disqus or pick a name
        ?

        Disqus is a discussion network

        • Disqus never moderates or censors. The rules on this community are its own.
        • Your email is safe with us. It's only used for moderation and optional notifications.
        • Don't be a jerk or do anything illegal. Everything is easier that way.
        By signing up, you agree to the Disqus Basic Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy.
        By posting, you agree to the Disqus Basic Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy.
        • MrsCheech an hour ago
          Oh, Andrea. Here is a book for you:
          http://www.amazon.com/Life-Bot...
          It's chock full of people who are drawn to men who beat the shit out of them when they deserve it. Lots of them come from the same background as you. You'll learn a lot from it.
          You know how your MIL freaked the fuck out when Timmie married you? She was right. Sadly, he seems to have found his own level, but momma never wants to see her baby boy for who he is.
            see more
            • Radium 2 hours ago
              I've personally dated several women who craved dominance in various forms when they knew that they did something to be disrespectful to me. In those situations, I was angry and would not respond physically. One relationship ended mostly because of this or at least it would not have ended when it did if I physically disciplined her as she asked rather than required a discussion and accountability. Without the anger, I would have responded to what was asked.
              I'm very selective of who I date. I've been intimate with only a handful of women, and nearly all had the desire to be physically disciplined when they were disrespectful. A close female friend tells me all women have this desire, but only if they respect their man.
                see more
                • Richard Sanford a day ago
                  I know this isn't strictly related to this post, but after reading the post it just got stuck in my head. TVTropes has some great "Double Standard" pages.
                  Hawthorne plays this alarmingly straight. Christina's Bratty Teenage Daughter Camille comes in with a black eye, Christina manages to get that it was her boyfriend Marcus who hit her out of a bunch of whining and silence, and chases Marcus through the ER throwing things at him. Later she finds out Marcus - the ultimate Nice Guy - never touched Camille. She was whaling on him after his friend forwarded a nude pic to him and she mistakenly believed that he was cheating on her, and in the process tripped and hit her face on a defibrillator. (They were in an unmanned ambulance at the time.) Christina's response? "What were you thinking, laying your hands on a man? Do you know what he could have done to you?" So ... a boy hitting a girl is a crime bad enough to justify being chased through his place of work and having objects thrown at his head, but a girl hitting a boy is only bad because he might have to hurt her defending himself. Furthermore, Camille was perfectly content letting her mother believe Marcus hit her until Christina called in a police officer friend of hers. Later Camille tells Marcus that she only went so crazy on him because she loves him.
                    see more
                    • F Harper 2 days ago
                      Somewhere, right now, David Futrelle is reading this article and giggling to himself. I imagine the title of his inevitable response will be something like: "Self-Hating Misogynist Janet Bloomfield Thinks Men Should Hit Women".
                      It's a provocative piece, and for myself, I would never choose violence except in self-defense, whether dealing with a man or a woman, but I do understand the sentiment. Malaysian Neocon is spot on about upbringing being a prime factor in this. Feminists tend to come from dysfunctional families with an absent or abusive father. Having a loving father in the home makes it much harder to view men as terrible people and to believe in the grand conspiracy of patriarchy. Many, if not most of them really are sad, broken people who blame society for the failings they experienced growing up.
                        see more
                        • 2cyar 3 days ago
                          I guess, as we as a society are coerced into embracing hedonism as the ultimate lifestyle, we all have to consider the 'normal' responses of our primitive lizard brains and try to integrate that into our laws and notions of justice. Personally I don't consider that very progressive but it is definitely appropriate for contemporary "progressive" reality.
                            see more
                            • Khira Kaiser 3 days ago
                              This was all...so fucking perfect I don't even know what I can add.
                              I was raised that if I were to hit a guy, be prepared to possibly get it back. NO ONE SHOULD HIT ANYONE. Kumbaya.
                              Something happened to my little brother that made me feel like this bullshit of women playing innoc...LOL I can't finish that..."innocent" angels 24/7 is a fucking LIE.
                              When he was only 15, he went to the Y after school and he didn't want or have many friends except this girl, Becky. Becky had medical problems, was overweight slightly because of it and just prime cut for teen bitches. Four girls cornered her AT THE Y! and my brother stepped in telling them to leave Becky alone. The leader, Twat A, punched him in the throat. He shoved her to the ground to get her AWAY from him and then the dumbfuck Y people came over. He was "suspended" from there for a month. Twat A? Nothing. And she went on to tourney Becky and my brother because she had this "ha ha you can't touch me~" free pass all women THINK they should get. Too bad I was over 18 and ya know...jail sucks, I hear. My mom pulled him out anyway from the injustice that he had to go through.
                              That's when I saw how this double standard is and it needs to stop. Bill Burr (Fuck I love him! but lost respect since his wife walks all over him and basically is a cunt) nailed it. There are men who will just open fire for nothing - BUT SO WILL WOMEN! And the sucky thing is that we do it diabolically. We're HORRIBLE people! Even with our friends! We pull the fake smile, silent hatred, words that cut people down to ash. If any species needs more slaps, it's us. I'm beginning to understand pimps...what the hell.
                              The fact is, most men are stronger and can do a lot more physical damage than most women added with this "innocent angel made of sugar and spice" that have society making us "untouchable" and girls use that! I hate, hate, hate it. Women in other countries are treated like literal shit, let's see these protected angels go visit the Middle East for a day and see how well they got it. Or idk, raise your daughter right?
                              Sorry I did have a lot to add lol.
                                see more
                                • Eva-Lynne 3 days ago
                                  My comment is simply about whether getting physical doesn't just feed the troll. For a longer version of that chain of thought, a pingback post: https://genxperience.com/2016/...
                                    see more
                                    • Malaysian Neocon 3 days ago
                                      I recommend this post by The Last Psychiatrist, where he/she states that for some people from broken upbringings, the only attention they ever got was negative attention - scoldings, beatings - but it was still attention, and they craved it! And this carries into adulthood, where they still subconsciously crave the negative attention - leading to provoking of abuse.
                                      Check out the reference to the 'Still Face Experiment' which is used to bolster this argument.
                                      Mrs Bitch, thank God you didn't turn out that way despite your upbringing.
                                        see more
                                        • Malaysian Neocon > Malaysian Neocon 3 days ago
                                          Excerpt:
                                          But if Dad is distant, or interested in chasing skirts (such daughters grow up trying to look like the kind of girl Dad is attracted to), or mom's always drunk, then "work" happens, and the kid starts to try new ways of getting the affect, and unfortunately the easiest way to get sucky parents to give you affect is to enrage them. That works awesomely. The best is when the parent beats you mercilessly, and then does a 180 and apologizes profusely, hugs you, buys you gifts, "oh, baby, I am so sorry I did that, Daddy was just upset..." Nothing in life will ever match up to that, except maybe a boyfriend who does that.
                                          ...
                                          Remember: the goal of this strategy is not happiness, it is avoiding abandonment.
                                            see more
                                          • the_spiral 3 days ago
                                            No. Physical violence is a choice, not an inevitability. If your partner (male or female) cheats on you or disrespects you, the most logical response is to LEAVE THE PERSON. "Beating the shit out of them" doesn't follow at all—it's actually a sign you've lost control of your emotions. The only situation where the most logical course of is violent assault is if someone assaults you first or makes it clear they're about to (i.e. self-defense). The law of this land agrees with me and so does nearly every standard of basic morality.
                                            And honestly, screw you for equating erotic spankings and other consensual adult activities with non-consensual assault. Your thinking on this matter is dangerous.
                                              see more
                                              • Janet Bloomfield Mod > the_spiral 2 days ago
                                                Bullshit. You do not throw away a marriage over infidelity or disrespect, especially when children are involved. You figure out what your partner is missing from the relationship and work through it. Your casual attitude towards divorce and your willingness to destroy the happiness of children and your spouse is exactly what is wrong with the world. Commitment, faithfulness, honor, duty. Those words mean something. And those things are not fucking free.
                                                You make me sick.
                                                  see more
                                                  • 2cyar > Janet Bloomfield 2 days ago
                                                    "Bullshit. You do not throw away a marriage over infidelity or disrespect, especially when children are involved."
                                                    Everybody is different, which is one of the reason's that I would like to see government dictated civil marriage terms replaced with negotiated domestic relationship contracts. Some people expect fidelity, while others are quite happy to have a sexually "open" relationship. I don't understand open relationships and I don't have to. I don't have to be concerned about what other people expect if I have the freedom to set my own terms for myself and my partner agrees with them. If fidelity is expected and agreed upon, then who is it who has thrown away the marriage? The promise breaker, or the "cheated" on who holds their partner to terms of their agreement?
                                                    "You figure out what your partner is missing from the relationship and work through it."
                                                    In my own case, I expect fidelity, and if my partner "cheated" on me I would say that she already discovered what was missing from the relationship, and took the initiative to solve the problem herself. There's no fucking way that I'm beating her so she can get off. She should move on with her new partner, I should keep my property, she should keep hers, and we should share custody of the kids 50/50.
                                                    "Your casual attitude towards divorce and your willingness to destroy the happiness of children and your spouse is exactly what is wrong with the world."
                                                    Who has the casual attitude towards divorce? The promise keeper, or the promise breaker?
                                                    The theory is that children benefit by having access to BOTH parents, and an assumption of joint custody goes a long way to providing them that, in contrast to what we generally have now...and the "best interests of the child" argument has long been used to deprive the father of ANY consideration or human rights at all.
                                                    "Commitment, faithfulness, honor, duty. Those words mean something."
                                                    Yeah, those words mean that men are screwed and will continue to be screwed because they are male only expectations. Females only have one word to concern themselves about..."empowerment."
                                                      see more
                                                      • the_spiral > Janet Bloomfield 2 days ago
                                                        Sure, because exposing your children to domestic violence is so much healthier and will definitely preserve their happiness. And now "beating the shit out of" your partner equals "figuring out what your partner is missing from the relationship and working through it"? Nice goalpost shift. Do you also condone women beating their husbands up or is this a one-way street? And I don't support divorce either, but if your only other option is committing felony assault (and it isn't, you sad bitter old sociopath) separating while you work on your respective issues is absolutely the better choice.
                                                        And sweetie, the feeling is more than mutual.
                                                          see more
                                                        • Tyler > the_spiral 3 days ago
                                                          1. Yes, violence is a choice, but that doesn't really mean anything. Eating is a choice, and a pretty damn good one in most cases. So is bathing. In some circumstances, violence is a good choice.
                                                          2. Your solution for your partner acting shitty is to END the relationship? That's only an advisable solution these days because of the legal climate (such harsh penalties associated with hitting your partner, especially if it's a woman). I can see wanting to end the relationship on the grounds that they're a shitty person, but there's a huge difference between a person who's irretrievably shitty, and someone who's having an asshole moment. Corrective action and consequences ARE effective tools in securing the health of a relationship, especially with people who are predisposed to desire to submit in some form (as is the case with most women).
                                                          Hell, look at JB's own description of the situation with her husband. He has never hit her, but she has the clear impression that he would if she was a grade A cunt about something. She perceives a boundary he has set and will enforce, and I'd bet a reasonable sum that her recognition of this STRENGTHENS the relationship between them. One, because it engenders respect in her for him (how many women respect a man without the balls to stand up to them, and yes, 'standing up' sometimes means physical violence, carefully measured), and two, because it motivates her (among many reasons, since she's not a ratchet) to steer way clear of doing such things which would be harmful to their relationship. And in the event she did step over that line and was smacked back into the zone of acceptable behavior? She can either be an adult, recognize she was in the wrong, and they can continue on their way, or she can act like a toddler, throw a tantrum that someone DARED limit her actions, and detonate the relationship.
                                                          The concept of a measured response of violence is one that is decidedly masculine, the application of real violence having been the province of men for most of our history. And, like most masculine doctrines, it has been all but forgotten by most of our society. But once upon a time, men were taught that they had a responsibility to their family and their community to use force to protect loved ones and uphold community standards, and NOT overuse that force to become a tyrant. Discretion is the better part of valor, but a man unwilling to lay the pimp hand down has no valor.
                                                          Wanda Sykes had an excellent bit in one of her shows, where she does a (comedic) take on this. It was a mother lecturing her daughter about throwing away a relationship just because 'it wasn't working.' She recounts a time when she had a shootout with her own husband, over some disagreement, and shot him in the process. "he was wrong, I shot him," and they were still married. She points at the bullet scar in his side and says "see that? That's love right there." I'm obviously doing a terrible delivery, but the point stands: sometimes people have shithead moments, and need to be put back in line, and adults will thank you for it after they calm down, while children will continue their temper tantrum and end up alone.
                                                          3. "beating the shit out of them" can indicate you've lost control of your emotions, if the scale of the violence is out of proportion with the offense. Put her in the hospital for burning the toast? Out of control. Slapping her in the face for screaming at your dad's funeral that she fucked him? Totally warranted (though she's probably a lost cause in that case).
                                                          4. The fact that the law of this land agrees with you doesn't mean shit. It's also the law of the land to incarcerate for years someone found in possession of a mild psychoactive substance less dangerous than alcohol.
                                                          5. "So does nearly every standard of basic morality"
                                                          Three problems here:
                                                          a. Suuuuuuper projecting.
                                                          b. 'Nearly' is a weasel word here.
                                                          c. Totally vague. What constitutes basic? If a person (like me) has a morality which does not agree with yours, is mine not basic? Is it not morality, just because you say so? Or does it fall under the weasel umbrella of 'nearly?'
                                                          6. I agree that erotic spankings are a different thing (in theory, since I don't enjoy being spanked so I can't say I understand the psychology behind enjoying it), but JB isn't wrong either: it likely plays a role. Women by their nature respond sexually to being put in a submissive role, and it's not far fetched at all to think that they'd go to some pretty crazy lengths to get that need met if it isn't being met. Look at the ridiculous debasements men will go through for pussy. Women have a different sex drive, but no less powerful.
                                                          Summation:
                                                          Your position is childish, and takes no recognition of the fact that boundaries and structure (enforced through violence or the credible threat of it) are absolutely beneficial to the growth and functioning of humans when applied correctly, and disastrous when abused. Just because you have no idea what the difference between judicious and abusive use of force is doesn't mean the difference doesn't exist. Grow up.
                                                            see more
                                                            • artiefischel > Tyler 2 days ago
                                                              A boundary that can be crossed is not a boundary, it's just a suggestion. I would say your soft-peddling of violence is childish, and you should grow up. So they had a "asshole moment"? Hmm, that means they are capable of having an "asshole moment", and you won't necessarily know when the next one is coming. So what will it be, and if they are the one with the propensity to violence, will you survive it? They might not even intend to kill you, but you end up dead or really injured just the same. Look at the Ray Rice video. Most of the damage his wife took was from hitting her head on the railing, which I doubt he intended. I think Rice was acting in self defense and was just unlucky that his wife hit her head.
                                                              What would you say to finding out your business partner is embezzling from the firm? Aw shucks, hope for the best it doesn't happen again? I'd say sever the connection, call a lawyer, and call the cops. Maybe you see that as a juvenile insistence on the law. I see it as being an adult, and realizing that the person you have a contract with does not honor contracts. Marriage is a contract, whether it's open or closed or however you arrange it. If it's broken, sever the connection, get a lawyer. Anything else is just wishful thinking.
                                                              "Just because you have no idea what the difference..."
                                                              And who chooses this? The guys that murdered Emmet Till? SJW protesters trying to shut down a men's rights talk? They thought they were acting in the best interest of their community and justice, so I guess it must have been so. I think I'll stick with law, with all its failings.
                                                                see more
                                                          • ME 3 days ago
                                                            Now there's a loaded and provocative subject, Judgy.
                                                            What women tend to crave the most is male dominance, protection and provision, don't we? Isn't that what is usually at the heart of the masculinity that we find so attractive? So, nothing says domination quite as fast as a good smack. I do observe that the more we have erased masculinity in the world, the more mainstream BDSM has become, until you wind up with 50 shades of gray being a bestseller. My theory is that women are growing more and more sexually confused, that our quests for equality are not in keeping with our own biology and attraction cues. Repressed and dysfunctional female sexuality, we're the culture tells us it's wrong to desire actual men, that we are supposed to go for the more sensitive feminist types, and then in a desperate attempt to try to create sexual attraction, women will often try to provoke men.
                                                            I suspect this is true in part from the response I often receive just trying to suggest that female attraction is linked to male dominance, us being hardwired to desire someone capable of providing protection and provision, which then triggers us sexually. It makes perfect sense to me, but oh goodness is that a shameful thing to speak of in today's culture! Women aren't supposed to admit that or know it or even speak of it. I'm too old to care, but young girls seem to believe they're so sexually wise and open, but all I see is incredible shame and repression, and complete denial about the nature of themselves.
                                                              see more
                                                              • JinnBottle 3 days ago
                                                                JB often in her posts probably shocks many; but she is in fact merely voicing truths about men & women that were received wisdom back before 1970. You know - back when sex was so hot it was actually *desirable* - back before the worlds of sex, love, romance, relationships, and marriage got taken over by a ruling class of pussies and neurotics and liars.
                                                                  see more
                                                                • Viki Samoja 3 days ago
                                                                  Things like spanking release endorphin, it's a self secreted anesthetic and a drug, yes it definitely can be addictive, while i do not begrudge any woman her desire to submit to a man, and indeed, while i don't understand it, i fully support even her desire to be abused (because hey, i know it seems dysfunctional but none of us has the capacity to choose what turns them on) but, and i can't overstate this enough, it must always be consensual, it seems to me like this women who are provoking their husbands into beating them are doing so because they want to avoid responsibility, submissive person can and sometimes does give up all agency to the dominant, but it's agreed upon in advance, even if submissive person decided to give up agency in a sense they exercised agency by giving it up, provoking other people to satisfy your own lust is not only extremely dangerous and irresponsible, it's also in every way abusive,it makes little difference if you coerce another person into position of submission or dominance, it's still wrong and mentally damaging for that person. If women are indeed adults then they should take responsibility for their own sexual desires, unless they are using this to avoid feelings of responsibility in which case they are indeed dysfunctional.
                                                                    see more
                                                                    • No one important 3 days ago
                                                                      Probably, our current laws have to sacrifice the emotional needs of these few women that enjoy being subjected to violence by their partners to ensure the protection of the many ones that do not share these needs, and yet are victims to such violence. There is no real discussion to be had here. The protection of the many is more important that the satisfaction of the few.
                                                                        see more
                                                                        • Viki Samoja > No one important 3 days ago
                                                                          You know that as many as 68% or more women have rape fantasy? It's not small minority as most of us assume, it's in actual fact rather large majority, they just can't wrap their heads around this desires they have.
                                                                            see more
                                                                            • No one important > Viki Samoja 3 days ago
                                                                              Everyone has fantasies, but they are that, just fantasies. I bet the people that would actually want to put these fantasies to practice are quite few.
                                                                                see more
                                                                                • Viki Samoja > No one important 3 days ago
                                                                                  Ah, but IMO rape fantasy is just unripe BDSM fantasy in most cases, and for most people barrier to living out at least milder version of their fantasy is more often then not social stigma and shame, rather then it being non genuine.
                                                                                    see more
                                                                                    • No one important > Viki Samoja 2 days ago
                                                                                      What social stigma and shame is this? Whatever a man and a woman do in the bedroom together is a private business and society has no way to stigmatize that.
                                                                                      But if a woman is abused, society must make sure there are laws to protect the victim. It would be a shame if perpetrators could get away with their crime claiming it was just some BDSM game gone wrong. And it would be a shame that a man becomes a rapist because discussions like these have misguided him into thinking he was providing some kind of fantasy relief.
                                                                                        see more
                                                                                        • Viki Samoja > No one important 2 days ago
                                                                                          Well that's not exactly true, people often fear of even bringing it up because they are afraid other person would be put off by it, and sure enough BDSM puts such massive emphasis on consent for a very good reason, it's iffy subject, many people in this circles actually want to feel like they have no control, may have something to do with guilt avoidance and stuff, but it's still important to set up clear boundaries, even if you later pretend they don't exist you are still in your mind aware of them and don't cross them. Again the whole subject is kind of an iffy thing because some denominations are particularly about pushing boundaries, but the worst thing you can do is push it onto someone who does not want it. Maybe the best way to solve this would be to basically legalize BDSM contracts as sort of social contract,where one party can give permission to another party to do something which would otherwise be considered illegal, the tricky thing is that some of this people are aroused at the thought of there being no way out, and if they can annul the contract at any time (which they should be able to do if it is to be fair) it could put them off of doing it, and there is still a lot of social stigma attached to it. All in all it does muddy the waters quite a bit, don't just dismiss it as irrelevant.
                                                                                            see more
                                                                                • Trumpenkrieger 3 days ago
                                                                                  Is this the result of natural female inclinations? Or that society has degenerated so much that chicks contemplate rape and BDSM? Or both?
                                                                                  And further, should this shit be reined in? It puts the focus on women and their pleasure again.
                                                                                    see more
                                                                                  loading Cancel
                                                                                  Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
                                                                                  Email check failed, please try again
                                                                                  Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
                                                                                  :)
                                                                                  0%
                                                                                  10%
                                                                                  20%
                                                                                  30%
                                                                                  40%
                                                                                  50%
                                                                                  60%
                                                                                  70%
                                                                                  80%
                                                                                  90%
                                                                                  100%