全 4 件のコメント

[–]socialjusticeorc 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, its pretty drastic how quickly it went from "LITERALLY hALO AND an INSULT" to best thing evar.

Im avoiding the game subs because I actually enjoy the game a lot, and I'd rather keep it that way.

[–]IDCbouturfantasyteam 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Actually though what in the fuck happened. Everyone was bitching and moaning about the fucking beta as if Doom is some renowned multiplayer arena shooter and the campaign is an afterthought, and now all these supposed OG Doom fans are all surprised that the campaign is good? If you're an OG Doom fan you probably weren't all that concerned about the multiplayer to be honest

[–]techiesbesthero 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because bethseda/zenimax marketed this game horribly for core gamers who post on internet forums. Between the release of the campaign trailer and the end of the multiplayer beta the game's marketing was 100% for the mutliplayer. Even before that the the amount they gave for the single player wasn't enough to judge if the game will be good or not. We got two 5 minute pieces of year old footage shown at e3, Two pieces of 1 minute footage that is just a quickly edited footage of demons getting killed and some articles by gameinformer. After how horribly the multiplayer beta was received bethseda put out a 90 minute stream of the singleplayer showing it off and people turned around on the game and went "yea that looks pretty good!"

If you go to any thread on any forum about Doom 2016 the discussion is dominated by the single player, some mention snap map but no one mentions the mutliplayer. I've seen numerous people in threads talking about the single player saying it's amazing. I talked to one guy who told me its the best game he's ever played.

If bethseda showed what makes the single player so good than the negative response to this game would be minimal. But we got a focus on the bad part of the game instead and a strong example of miss marketing a video game.