use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~68 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
First time here? Welcome! You ask questions; we provide answers. A great resource to check before you ask a question is the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. You may also want to check our list of frequently asked questions to see if your question has already been answered.
Don't be afraid if you think your question is too simple. AskPhilosophy defines itself less by the sort of questions that are accepted than by the sort of answers they can expect to receive. Feel free to ask about topics you're studying in school, but please read about how to avoid plagiarism first.
Want to be a panelist? Have questions about what that means? Start here.
If you plan to comment regularly, you must request flair. Comments (not questions) posted by users without flair will be looked on with suspicion.
We actively moderate the quality of comments to this subreddit. We require that especially top-level responses to questions show familiarity with the question, and ideally that they make reference to the existing literature on that topic.
Level of involvement: (indicated by color)
Professional Graduate Undergraduate Autodidact
For more on how we use flair, see this thread.
Ask: AskReddit | AskAcademia | AskComputerScience | AskCulinary | AskElectronics | AskEngineers | AskHistorians | AskLiteraryStudies | AskReligion | AskScience | AskSciTech | AskStatistics
Philosophy: Philosophy | AcademicPhilosophy | Aesthetics | Bioethics | ContinentalTheory | PhilosophyOfMath | Neurophilosophy | PoliticalPhilosophy | PhilosophyOfReligion | PhilosophyOfScience | TheAgora
Why is eating meat immoral? (self.askphilosophy)
Fossil_Cloud が 8時間前 * 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]usmclvsop -9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント 5時間前 (34子コメント)
It's not.
[–]Rivka333Greek, Arabic and Medieval Metaphysics 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Look; you could be right, but you should try to back it up with some semblance of an argument.
[+]rafajafar スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 5時間前* (32子コメント)
This is the correct answer. If you must ask the question, then it is not amoral to you. There is no universal morality surrounding meat consumption that would satisfy the world... because humans crave meat and it is part of our evolved diet. If you are ok with eating meat, then the answer is that it is not amoral.
EDIT: I'd respond faster but thanks to all the assholes who downvote shit they disagree with, I now must wait 10 minutes between posts. Nice ethics there, guys!
[–]ExplicitGG 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 5時間前* (31子コメント)
Well if we go with that line, some pedophile can say that his acts aren't amoral and he would be right. Imagine that he is from Saudi Arabia 1500 ago and in that case he has one cultural discourse behind him. Obviously problem is little bit complicated than "moral is subjective or equal to my desire"...
[–]MasterFunk 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5時間前 (6子コメント)
YEAH! /u/Rafajafar, you're totally missing a whole lot of information. While I agree that simply eating meat isn't immoral, but this sure is [pictures of factory farming])https://www.google.ca/search?q=factory+farm&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjh0YaM6dnMAhUDyWMKHUe1C-8Q_AUIBygB&biw=960&bih=485#imgrc=e-eJh-90WvtG7M%3A) and one thing leads to another.
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 5時間前 (5子コメント)
I don't have a problem with any of that.
[–]MasterFunk 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (4子コメント)
Ok, I understand that and it's fine to have that opinion, but that doesn't mean it is or is not moral.
[–]rafajafar -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 3時間前 (3子コメント)
EXACTLY! That's what I am trying to say. There's so many people taking the hard-lined stance that eating meat is universally immoral, but the reality is that it's a personal moral judgement. You can't say "eating meat is immoral" because ... it's not. Not in any real sense. If you think it is and it bothers you, do something about it, but that's YOUR CALL.
[–]MasterFunk 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
whats the difference between universally moral and personally moral? is this a thing? cause if we had a vote then I think it's going to be a landslide. "Eating meat is immoral" whos meat? the cows, well let's ask the cows... Yeah, they think it's immoral... well, lets ask the pigs.... yup they think it's immoral... broccoli?.....broccoli?... they're not responding...
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
Pretty sure broccoli is alive too, man. In fact, plants respond to pain. Sustenance requires predatory behavior. You just need to get comfortable with that... or starve.
http://www.smithsonianchannel.com/videos/do-plants-respond-to-pain/12151
I'd respond faster but thanks to all the assholes who downvote shit they disagree with, I now must wait 10 minutes between posts. Nice ethics there, guys!
[–]sydbobyd 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
plants respond to pain.
You're reaching pretty far now. This is one of those arguments that any way you turn, the argument fails. For several reasons:
Even if you want to claim that plants "feel" pain, it's a huge and unscientific leap to think they feel pain equally to a pig or cow. If I set in front of someone a carrot and a dog, and told them that they could either stab the dog or chop the carrot, they're going to choose to cut the carrot and spare the dog. And that's not hypocritical, it's basing moral consideration on the sentience of the being.
We have to eat plants. Humans can't survive without eating plants. That's not the case with animals, we can choose not to eat them.
Even if you want to give moral consideration to plants because you think they feel pain, then you would still be better off on a vegan diet than an omnivorous one. It takes more plants to fuel a meat-eating diet than a vegan one because the animals you eat also had to eat plants. In fact, at least 50% of grain harvested worldwide goes to feed livestock, not people. Cut out the middle man there and you kill fewer plants and animals.
Not that it should make any difference to you whether plants feel pain if pain is irrelevant to moral consideration and morality is just personal judgement.
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 5時間前 (23子コメント)
When it comes to nutrition, we evolved to eat meat. In order to not eat meat you have to be quite privileged and monitor your own health pretty closely. Even then, in the case of an emergency you're not staying vegan. We, as humans, didn't choose our biological needs. Comparing this to pedophilia is really illogical. It's not the same.
[–]Amarkov 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4時間前 (10子コメント)
But many people are privileged enough to survive on a vegetarian diet. Why is it still okay for those people to eat meat?
[–]InsistYouDesist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
vegan diet. Vegetarian diets still lead to the suffering and death of countless animals.
[–]ADefiniteDescriptionlogic, truth, moral phil. 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 34分前 (0子コメント)
So do vegan diets (although far, far fewer animals). So we don't want to rest our point on whether our choices harm or kill any animals, but something a bit more complicated than that.
[–]rafajafar 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (7子コメント)
Because it's not an obligation...... it's a choice. There is no moral imperative to fight one's own biological predisposed needs. That's a personal choice, like I said.
[–]Amarkov 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4時間前 (6子コメント)
Would you argue that, if you have a biological predisposed need to have an affair, then there's nothing morally wrong with cheating on your husband?
[–]rafajafar -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 4時間前 (5子コメント)
Would you argue that, if you have a biological predisposed need to have an affair, that's morally okay?
We'll cross that imaginary rainbow bridge when we get there.
Or would you argue that's not a biological need?
Of course having an affair is not a biological need. It's a "want". Also, if you were to have an affair, I wouldn't go telling you it's amoral. That's none of my business and I'm not a busybody.
If so, why does the difference matter?
Because you're asking people to go pretty far, educate themselves very well on nutritional alternatives, how to monitor your own nutritional health, and to add dietary supplements to their diet. And for what? What gain does that give them? Nothing, honestly.
A solid majority of the population isn't even smart enough to properly handle a vegan diet. In that sense, preaching veganism is amoral, but whatever... it's not like people can't just go out and eat meat. If someone gets sick because they go vegan improperly then I guess that's just on them.
Me, I'm having a big fat steak tonight. I'm actually on a High-Fat, Low-Carb diet and have been for a couple years. I doubt I could live this healthily if I was vegan. HFLC is almost impossible to maintain vegan.
(In case you don't know, HFLC has a high success rate at treating Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and epilepsy, and researchers are still working out why as the mechanisms may lead to better treatments for those ailments. It also improves heart and blood health and is a fantastic weight management tool. )
[–]Amarkov 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4時間前 (3子コメント)
I mean, I suppose that's consistent. If you argue that it's never a moral imperative to do inconvenient things, of course you'll conclude meat-eating is morally okay. But most people are comfortable dismissing your premise as obviously silly.
[–]rafajafar 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (2子コメント)
But most people are comfortable dismissing your premise as obviously silly.
Most people eat meat, so I don't think you're right about this.
[–]Rivka333Greek, Arabic and Medieval Metaphysics 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
I'm actually on a High-Fat, Low-Carb diet
Not recommended by actual Nutritionists...(I'm not asking you to look up Government recommendations; while not terrible, they're not perfect either; the best source of authority in nutritional matters currently (in the USA) is the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health).
I do actually think that eating meat is morally permissible. I just don't think you're defending that position very well.
[–]Rivka333Greek, Arabic and Medieval Metaphysics 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
The prior person wasn't saying that eating meat is the same as pedophlia; s/he was saying that if we say that there is no universal morality, then that position can end up justifying pedophilia.
[–]sydbobyd 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
I like to give this for a lesson in analogies: Apples to Oranges.
[–]ExplicitGG 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (9子コメント)
It's logical to compare to pedophilia in terms that both treating animals for food and pedophilia cause unnecessary suffering and that you justify animal torture by your desire.
[–]rafajafar -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 4時間前 (8子コメント)
I'm not justifying it, it's just not unethical. It's the way reality is. Lions aren't really concerned about ethics when their stomachs growl.
If you want to be vegan, be vegan, but if you wanna tell me my biologically evolved preference in nutrition is amoral, well... you'll need a lot more than pictures of tortured food and slaughter houses to make me change my mind. I feel nothing from that and it's not exactly a rational argument. It's an appeal to emotions.
[–]lapse_of_taste 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 4時間前 (7子コメント)
Lions aren't really concerned about ethics when their stomachs growl.
Lions are not moral agents, and even if they were, that would have no bearing on what humans ought to eat.
I feel nothing from that and it's not exactly a rational argument. It's an appeal to emotions.
The rational argument is that meat eating causes unnecessary suffering, as evidenced by those pictures and videos.
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 4時間前 (6子コメント)
It's not unnecessary. It's completely necessary. And not all suffering is bad. Animals suffering is a means to an end. I do not shed tears for that, so you're going to have to prove that causing suffering, unnecessary or otherwise, is somehow immoral. I doubt you're capable of doing that. Mind you, most of those animals are only born to be our food. Their life was forfeit generations ago.
[–]lapse_of_taste 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (5子コメント)
It's completely necessary.
It's not necessary for us - we can live a healthy life without it.
so you're going to have to prove that causing suffering, unnecessary or otherwise, is somehow immoral.
Would it be immoral to cause you to suffer for my own enjoyment?
[–]rafajafar -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 4時間前 (4子コメント)
No. It's called internet trolling, and it's hilarious.
π Rendered by PID 8578 on app-159 at 2016-05-14 20:07:18.325432+00:00 running 1807e2d country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]usmclvsop -9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント (34子コメント)
[–]Rivka333Greek, Arabic and Medieval Metaphysics 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]rafajafar スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]ExplicitGG 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (31子コメント)
[–]MasterFunk 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]MasterFunk 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]MasterFunk 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sydbobyd 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (23子コメント)
[–]Amarkov 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]InsistYouDesist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ADefiniteDescriptionlogic, truth, moral phil. 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]rafajafar 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Amarkov 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Amarkov 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]rafajafar 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Rivka333Greek, Arabic and Medieval Metaphysics 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Rivka333Greek, Arabic and Medieval Metaphysics 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sydbobyd 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ExplicitGG 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]lapse_of_taste 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]lapse_of_taste 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]rafajafar -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (4子コメント)