あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]iamhungryalways 4ポイント5ポイント  (11子コメント)

But saying it that way is too forced. Puns are funniest when they are organic, which is why the op is the top comment and this one is being downvoted. It's too forced.

[–]runujhkj 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

IMO the response was the natural one and the OP's joke was forced and nonsensical.

[–]iamhungryalways 1ポイント2ポイント  (8子コメント)

You may think that, and that's fine, but from looking at the karma of the two it is clear that the majority of reddit disagrees with you.

[–]Xacloman -2ポイント-1ポイント  (6子コメント)

I love when people run out of arguments and go "but look at the karma".

Karma means nothing.

[–]iamhungryalways 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

I'm using it as an example of what the population thinks is better, where it is totally relevant. If the original comment was worse then it wouldn't have that many points. It's a simple system to show approval/disapproval of a comment/post, and here it is clear that most think the op is a better joke.

[–]Xacloman -2ポイント-1ポイント  (4子コメント)

If the original comment was worse then it wouldn't have that many points.

Nope. That's actually not how karma really works on reddit. If you browse often enough you know that there are about a billion factors that go into whether someone gets up or down votes. Like hive mind. Or just the fact it's easier to upvote one joke than to go through a comment chain and upvote the "better ones".

Karma is meaningless in an argument.

[–]wahpoutang 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

This discussion has become a perfect example of why people should only be allowed to make one reddit post a day.

[–]iamhungryalways -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not sure if you're trolling or not, but as long as the debate hasn't reduced to insults and childish responses I don't see the issue. Is our discussion affecting you in any way? I don't see how it could be. We both have opinions and are talking about why we think that way, just because it's the same two people doesn't mean it's useless or unneeded.

[–]Xacloman -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Funny coming from the guy who comments quite often.

[–]iamhungryalways -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not sure if you're trolling or not, but as long as the debate hasn't reduced to insults and childish responses I don't see the issue. Is our discussion affecting you in any way? I don't see how it could be. We both have opinions and are talking about why we think that way, just because it's the same two people doesn't mean it's useless or unneeded.

[–]Echo47m 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ok, lets try this. You are going to rob a bank, you have a plan to escape if the cops come by using a small explosive charge to blow out a large wall where an escape car is waiting. This is your back up plan right? cops come, all goes sideways, you set the charge, but instead of blowing out the wall, the whole wall and room collapses into debris and blocks your escape. Now you panic and look for a second way out. This was not your plan. This is you reacting to a situation gone wrong. This is the cat. The cat had no plan to back up. IT was forced to, because the pigeon did something it didn't expect. Its funny, because the cat a) didnt have a plan incase things went wrong (no good back up plan) and b) the result of having no back up plan, is the cat is forced to back up. Making the comment a pun. because the meaning(having an alternative or back up) is what he didnt have, so was forced to use the seconday meaning (reverse of movement, to back up) was the result of having no "alternate" plan.