It already is bad, without a comprehensive solution, attacked asylum centers will be the least of our worries.

those polls are not realistic. most people don't got asked how they will vote. me neither.

... ein mod

Thanks for my high quality contribution.

Thanks a lot for your quality CTRL-C / CTRL-V.

The comrades from /r/FULLCOMMUNISM could help us to /r/GULAG every reactionary on this sub, so no problem with that comrade.

Again, let's say you are a German living in Germany and a thousand of Indian engineers want to work in Munich.

You say that one of them wouldn't be a problem but a thousand of them would be (a thousand is an example). Why one is ok and a thousand is not ok? Where is the limit? Who sets it? If all the engineers in the world wanted to move to Germany, would you say they are too much and why?

Thanks for helping make my case. Same old xenophobic bullshit, then.

Switzerland is in Europe and have bilateral agreements with EU, so free movement of people applies there too.

...I know, most of my Aunties and Uncles moved to America and England between the 1920s and 50s, what's your point?

If they're highly educated I don't think anyone except neo nazis would have a problem with them.

So you're saying "Guilt by association"?

I like it, that sub has what, 4,500 subs (EDIT: Dayum it's 5.1k thats 600 since I last checked ~3 days ago) and how many comments do most posts get? usually under 100.

As with any group the radicals are the most vocal, those quotes don't prove anything.

Also, why should anyone listen to a communist who advocates the murder of people with different political views and pushes for social conflict as demonstrated by this post.

Comments section and sub of the post here.

Someone else made a similar comment here that wasn't a joke.

there have not been muslim no go zones for thirty to fifty years

its this new wave that's going in a causing all this damage

slow controlled immigration with properly planned integration is beneficial

allowing floods of migrants into nations is bad and will cause damage

there is not even enough housing for the people that are allready there

Thanks, finally someone who actually understands.

Muhammad was literally a warlord who spread his faith by the sword.

Most African nations are incredibly corrupt. Unless you find a way to empower the people there without them becoming dependent on the West, there is not much point in trusting their political leaders to actually use our aid to help their people.

so the rest of europe should be held responsible for the action of these

The European nations that were involved in colonizing Africa included:

this sins of the father bs you libs are on is stupid if a child's father kills, robs, steals, ect the child shares no responsibility

and the people in europe today are not responsible for the actions of others taken generations ago there was no vote on the war in the middle east either

its the people the will be impacted not the government the would only love a larger tax base un checked immigration if let continue will destroy european nations identity's in generations to come

im irish my country never invaded, colonized, anyone we were the ones invaded, colonized, enslaved and part of our nation is still occupied today

yet we are meant to share some responsibility for the actions of the nation that did that to us because we are a western nation

Dude you REALLY overestimate the importance of natural resources. Other than oil, natural resources don't make you rich, far from it, they're minimal in terms of value in your GDP/exports if your country is sufficiently developed, manufactured goods and services have way more value. Countries that rely mostly on exporting natural resources (other than oil) are poor. Northern European nations got rich without stealing resources from anyone. Germany barely had any colonies, and it's rich now. Spain stole more gold and silver than anybody else, and it's struggling now. It's not like in general, Europe countries that had colonies got richer than countries that didn't. And if you look at Africa, Ethiopia was never really colonized and it's not richer than other African countries that got colonized for centuries...

Now you are just differentiating between legal and illegal immigration. It's true it's much easier to migrate or immigrate within EU legally, and that is exactly what I was pointing out, many here wants to change that because there's a lot of perceived problems with criminals from Romania, cheap labor, etc. I don't agree with that. I'm just pointing out what you are saying, is something people are saying about Romanians. Ask Nigel Farage and his followers.