全 8 件のコメント

[–]rational_observer [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Better to just silently ignore them. Thanks to the tweet about blocking, they will get way more reads on that article and gain additional popularity.

[–]paperraincoat [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Better to just silently ignore them. Thanks to the tweet about blocking, they will get way more reads on that article and gain additional popularity banner ad revenue.

One of the most talented orators in the Bitcoin space: 1

Ranty "news" blog: 0

[–]evilpumpkin [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They get more views in the short term, yes. But they're damaging their reputation with those reading this pile of... words.

[–]schism1 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I have no idea who bitcoinist is but you are not going to gain fans by attacking Andreas.

[–]cryptohoney [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Good. <enter grumpy cat image here>

[–]fulltimegeek [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I regretfully called Andreas an #EtherShill when he tweeted that ShapeShift was back up and running (when it only had Ether support). Shortly after, he tweeted that he was unaware of the current limitation and that he doesn't shill. He then immediately followed up by blocking me on twitter. I don't blame him though --- the man gets attacked from all angles and is very defensive.

[–]NimbleBodhi [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I would block you too and anyone else who attacked me without merit, why waste time on trollish shit like that. This community is absolutely toxic, and many/most of the crypto based news sites seem to adopt that same toxic culture with garbage reporting, click-baiting, and zero journalistic integrity.

[–]fulltimegeek [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hence the second word in my comment "regretfully". I would've blocked myself too. I'm just shedding some light as to what type of stuff Andreas and other bitcoin evangelists encounter. It's not an easy job they have.