For whoever is wondering,
/u/Frekavichk
is talking about Cyborgmatt, who was shadowbanned by reddit admins because he alledgedly broke the 'no spam' rule of Reddit by 'only posting links to his own site'.
The problem here, is that this case needs some context: Matt has his own blog, where he posts a lot of cool stuff, and he contributed a lot to
/r/dota2
and the community in general. But, what he also did was make posts about new articles on his blog, hereby posting links to his own site, and thus technically breaking the rules. Only fair for him to be banned, no?
Well, no. The community - and even the mods - were perfectly OK with him doing this, since his articles were interesting and it didn't feel spammy at all. To us, he was just linking good content, which happened to be his.
This raises some questions: are the rules, which are meant to make everyone's Reddit experience more enjoyable, still applicable when they actually only work to the detriment of the community they were made to 'protect'? Should we enforce the rules 'just because they are the rules' even though it makes no sense
in this particular case?
/r/dota2
didn't think so, so we spoke up. Apparently it worked, because
/u/Cyborgmatt
seems to be un-shadowbanned now, and he is once again able to post, although i think he still has restrictions to his account (can't post links or something of the like).