"They've gone so far off the deep end, that even saying you don't like Islam, Mohammed was a terrorist, or the Koran incites violence again non-Muslims is all hate speech."

The Koran <b>prescribes</b> violence upon the deserving of among whom are the recalcitrant heretic, righteous violence engrained in character, exhibited in habit and succession of authority, written with the pen which is the tongue of the mind a brutalization process. But the brutalization techniques producible at this stage in technology are my friend, only make it all too evident that is just a fact of life that I do not hate affliction, mostly as there are some hateful afflictions, and the game will be up. The exemplary man exposed as example precisely because he was expert in and advocated violence to subdue his opponents, as well as a genius, a vector inflection point at a balance of powers within the societies there. But observant as he was, he saw more but a amplitude of resonance with the world about him, the mind by excess of propagation whose mirror we darkly gleam smeared scarcely readable, spelling hobbled utterly unambiguous prescription to enforce universal justice -justice in imitation (inevitability imitation occasionally takes up habits of high replicability), but sometimes inseasons. The Fall comes, and a winter sprig upon the tree of life springs into a flourishing bloom up to the tip of this new vector of replication. And the optimal temperature may be different at different ages in the course of human history. And if we are to self select in regarding it as a complete right as carrying a gun to kill a child whilst it is nestled in the womb, we shall with silent gravitational influence or spry waves of air pressure, or half remembered definite conclusions with plausible sources explorable, but in an obscure, high priced, academic journals. The language of high price, that which notes when a high price is paid for following combinations of instinct and impulse to which labled axes of instance of imperatives being implemented, from those drunk in their own zeal material giving great significance to their own abstentious sobriety, which does not even playfully lose track of it's purpose, and pay a high price for awkwardly getting less wrong bad philosophy more frequently than it discovers wherefore it is discovered in as much where it is discovered before. Debrutalization of political power involves dismantling mass cults which consistently maintain confidence in the continued leadership of the Disciples, and the writings and legends and habits of attire, conceptual heuristic tactics that teach strategy of the One Mohammed, who simply heard very saw loudly viscerally what others too know better than he, because they all could recognize it in him that is in me. One must merely trace the course of his life and the example scaled over different times in imitation of him. The countless metonyms, the meme association corrupting the perfected and perfecting the fortunate, oh fickly fortune, but what apptetite will not re-arise as it did in him. It's the arrogance of the categorical eschatatology and divine principle of order by the teachings of the Desert God, the God of the Mood hurtling into the shadow of earth with but a razor of a crescent left illuminated. The moon reaches 123 C temperature (20c above boiling point of water), and -150C, rapid ice burns. There is a time for peace and a time for war, for love and occasionally justice. Why would you think anything else would be at stake but holding of the highest hubris? There are reliable ways and means, and Mohammed was a multifaceted teacher, his ruthelessly establishing uniformity of obeisance, so it's fidelity can be widely recognized, his equally sanguine sentimentalities as droll and forgiving, and vouchsafing indulgence as though the world was at his control. Some nasty shit will come to serve as an infamous reference point of how primitive metaman was yet so blind as will half see what they believe everywhere at all times. I should think it's better off common knowledge that the Political projects laid out on the Koran, are tried and true, they had their day, they proved their folly and the phones all ring out, hands to pockets go the crowds, "Hello World. Nobody really knows the pace of events, but it can be expected to escalate in salience as the settlers establish in, and after earning more comfortable situation, chances one day to look again at their scripture in gratitude. Those unhinged and gratuitous glorification never moderate scorn, just various difference kinds of extreme scorn.

I have taken Koran by my right hand and I was holding a deadly weapon, sharpened in chronological order - no more of this obfuscation of predatory opportunism, opportunistic opportunism, and general lack of principle except justifying something by one principle, well actually interlocking system of authority far too tangled for anyone to understand with certainty but by presupposition as a parameter, where it's not so clear which is the cause and which the effect when mans conceits calls him to the total vision of the eternal god, which is totally immune to our flaws. Alas for us, Mohammed was a triumphant self promoting gangster. And, you know, we're going to have to put to bed this dream that Islam is the overriding behavioral organizing principle. Trying to follow fidelity to the text, though in itself an excellent surmise, could not compensate for failing to be faithful to texts which would prove more faithful representations of the knowable, the likely and the wise, with equal fidelity hold. For if not truth, what else guides our inquiry? Gods metonymic attributes remain the elusively obvious answer for his extent and power, but is rudely ignorant of the source of his distinctive influence on the world that bore him, and the one that broke his body down is not the exclusive gift of onely one voice. It is the onencess of the voice that is the critical innovation, and it's identity, it's well precedented vindictiveness against dissent. In the long run it could be some mere conceit. At other eras it becomes extremely predictable. That is there is no plausible scheme to combine the motives of all human beings to one end. Thus wanting, the last resort is to force. And from beginning to end, that conquest and plunder has proved profitable, and ebbing and flowing in intensity, but most definitely dangerous, because it can never achieve it's goal. All other means will fail and it will turn to force. But it will still fail, though through generating hardship and misery for human kind, strengthen it.