0
0

Wtf Comedy central? (self.DailyShow)

tommyblue00 が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]alpacasallday -43ポイント-42ポイント  (13子コメント)

I think it's good that they spoke about Bernie's problems. But yeah, they need to take a really close look at Hillary because there's an amount of bullshit connected to her, and I can smell it from Mars.

[–]jigielnik 43ポイント44ポイント  (12子コメント)

You're exactly who that bit was lampooning and you don't even realize it. Sad. But that's reddit for ya.

Have you just once considered that this "bullshit" you smell is in fact a scent trail put in place intentionally by right wing republicans in an effort to distract from her stellar record of public service? Have you just once considered you're buying into a 20 year old narrative invented by her enemies? Or is the fact that she "feels" corrupt and you read a few DailyKos articles enough for you?

[–]Tsulaiman 0ポイント1ポイント  (9子コメント)

Asking for balance and no bias is considered crazy?

Hillary is corrupt (taking money from corps she says she'll fight against), wrong with major decisions (Iraq war, Benghazi, $15 min wage) and just downright shady(emails). You're the one who's been desensitized to it. And when an honest man tries to fight the good fight for the poor and weak and has done it for twice as long as Hillary, he's called an idiot..

[–]jigielnik -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

Asking for balance and no bias is considered crazy?

Yes. They are a comedy show. Not journalists. They don't owe you or Bernie supporters shit and frankly, the Daily Show has taken it SO easy on Bernie, over the last year they have barely touched on so many comedy gold moments surrounding his campaign and its supporters. They do one bit attacking the fact that his supporters - like you - refuse to hear any criticisms of Bernie and the entire BernieBro world goes nuts. Exactly like the sketch.

They are under no obligation to be unbiased or balanced. They can do whatever they want and they very clearly don't care who it bothers. That's called comedy, and the right of comedians to make fun of whoever they want - "balanced" or not - is actually protected speech.

Hillary is corrupt (taking money from corps she says she'll fight against), wrong with major decisions (Iraq war, Benghazi, $15 min wage) and just downright shady(emails). You're the one who's been desensitized to it.

You've made it easy for me to reply because I can just copy/paste what I said to the other guy:

You're exactly who that bit was lampooning and you don't even realize it. Sad. But that's reddit for ya.

And when an honest man tries to fight the good fight for the poor and weak and has done it for twice as long as Hillary, he's called an idiot..

lol... you couldn't hide your ignorance if you tried.

[–]Tsulaiman -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

And you couldn't defend Clinton's scandals if your life and her life depended on it.

Edit: spelling.

[–]jigielnik -3ポイント-2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Hahhahgahhahhahhahaahah that was the most pathetic attempt at baiting/concern trolling since the last pathetic BernieBrat tried the same thing. You could debunk every malicious thing you think about her by yourself if you hadn't already determined that every source claiming Hillary isn't corrupt must itself be corrupt.

It's like the guy who walks around and complains that it stinks everywhere he goes. Well if that's you, maybe you should try taking a shower.

It'd be adorable - the way you all think you're crusaders when you acually come across like petulant toddlers - if it weren't so sad.

[–]Tsulaiman 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Fine let's pick one point. Why does she say she'll fight big banks but take money from them?

[–]JakeFace13 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Big banks don't give her money, people that work at banks (and investment banks and brokerages, etc.) do. That's a very important distinction to make, but seems to be lost on so many people who don't understand how campaign finance works. And she's getting donations from that sector (of which I am a part) because not only was she a wildly popular two-term senator here in NY, but she's the only one in the race who's not advocating initiatives that will ruin the financial sector (like Bernie's FTT. Ask Sweden how well that worked).

[–]jigielnik 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol again with the attempt at concern trolling. It's like you think I've never gone on reddit before. Here's how this goes:

  1. You ask me to prove some point about hillary.

  2. I go about providing a detailed, logical argument with a bunch of sources proving where you've either followed faulty evidence or allowed your own personal biases to go unnoticed.

  3. Regardless of what I've said, regardless of how many times this argument has worked to sway real people in the real world, regardless of how many legitimate sources I provide, no matter how non confrontational and friendly my approach is... you find a way to pick apart my argument by either declaring my sources - usually historically trusted sources that BernieBros have declared untrustworthy because they said (gasp) something critical of Bernie at some point - to be shills, corporate or part of the establishment... or you're finding some tiny sentence and taking it too literally, after which you dig in on said tiny misinterpretation and create a totally separate tangent... or you simply dismiss me outright by responding to one tiny part of my argument rather than the entire thing.

If this hadn't happened literally every single time I discuss politics with Bernie fans on reddit - despite again, having had lots of reasonable discussions with Bernie fans in the real world - then maybe I'd be more willing to play this whole thing out, but unfortunately I know exactly how it's going to go.

And then there's the final thing: I don't care for the way Bernie fans put the onus on Hillary fans to "convince" them to like Hillary. If you wanted to really figure out the answer to that question you've just asked, you could do it yourself, if you try not entering into your quest for information under the assumption she's already guilty

So if you wanna ignore logic, electoral mathematics and the reality of the pragmatic, progressive democratic policies Hillary has fought for her whole life and instead determine through a bunch of vague insinuations, youtube videos, TYT clips and Facebook memes that she's actually hopelessly corrupt, don't let me get in your way.

I'm not going to let you put the fact that you don't wanna do your research or read anything that might cast Bernie in a different light as a pure savior or Hillary as a corrupt devil, on me. That's your burden to carry.

[–]glabius -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

He has 35 upvotes on a dead thread, its obvious brigading.

[–]Tsulaiman 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Where from? This sub used to be dead...

[–]X0X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8X9 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Bought.

[–]6jarjar6 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Luckily the bought accounts can't delete comments.