jump to content
my subreddits
more »
Want to join? Log in or sign up in seconds.|
[-]
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
subreddit:subreddit
find submissions in "subreddit"
author:username
find submissions by "username"
site:example.com
find submissions from "example.com"
url:text
search for "text" in url
selftext:text
search for "text" in self post contents
self:yes (or self:no)
include (or exclude) self posts
nsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)
include (or exclude) results marked as NSFW
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
this post was submitted on
999 points (88% upvoted)
shortlink:
reset password

AskHistorians

subscribeunsubscribe480,037 readers
833 users here now
  1. This Week's Theme is Cooking and Baking

New to /r/AskHistorians? Please read our subreddit rules and FAQ before posting!

Apply for Flair

  • Upvote informative, well sourced answers
  • Downvote comments that are unhelpful or grossly off-topic
  • Report comments that break reddiquette or the subreddit rules

Resources

Flair

Our flaired users have detailed knowledge of their historical specialty and a proven record of excellent contributions to /r/AskHistorians.
Flair categories
To nominate someone else as a Quality Contributor, message the mods.

Upcoming Events

Participant(s) Event
TBA

Features

Feature posts are posted weekly. The current rotation is:

Related subreddits

Follow us on social media

created by ArtrwFounder | Chinese Exclusion in Californiaa community for
No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it?
Oops! I didn't mean to do this.
discuss this ad on reddit
message the moderators

MODERATORS

This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
[–]x--BANKS--x 605 points606 points607 points x2 (23 children)
As other comments noted, the quote is attributed to LBJ in Ronald Kessler's book, and was supposedly said to two southern governors. But in the absence of a reliable objective record of that quotation, among the best sources to answer your question are the presidential recordings made during the Johnson administration, which I've listened to at length during my undergrad studies. Several hundred conversations were recorded dealing with issues of racial politics and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A discussion of those conversations can be found here.
Now, a quote like the one in OP's question is not found in any of these recordings, nor do they contain the oft-cited statement to Bill Moyers that LBJ had "lost to the South to the GOP for a generation." But they do provide excellent insight into how LBJ talked about these issues in private. For example, it is simply undisputed that LBJ did use the prevailing southern racial slurs of the time, including the word "n-----r," as this actual recording demonstrates. This is hardly the only example.
Another famous example is cited in "Lone Star Rising: Lyndon Johnson and His Times, 1908-1960", by Robert Dallek. Johnson defended the Supreme Court appointment of the famous Thurgood Marshall, rather than a black judge less identified with the civil rights cause, by saying to a staff member, "Son, when I appoint a n-----r to the court, I want everyone to know he's a n-----r."
That being said, for a rural-born white Texan in the late 1960s, the collected recordings show that LBJ had some astonishingly progressive views on race in America, but his nomenclature leaves something to be desired. It is also worth noting that LBJ knew his audience, and would speak differently to a Georgia state legislator than, say, a Connecticut governor. It's very difficult to tell when LBJ is putting on an act for audience or when he's speaking with his "true" voice. Additionally, I tend to detect a bit of self-aware irony in some of LBJ's discussion of these issues. I think that's key to understanding how LBJ could say the most radically progressive statements while simultaneously using a racial slur.
But given the tone and tenor of LBJ's conversations on these issues, I think the best we can say is that the quote cited by OP is not inconsistent with LBJ's style. But it seems unlikely that we will ever know if those exact words were uttered. From my own studies, I personally think the quote is either genuine or a fair paraphrase. It's the kind of thing LBJ might say to a Dixiecrat to convince them not to oppose the CRA. Thus, if anyone got "tricked" over the CRA, it wasn't black America -- it was Southern conservative democrats. In other words, as u/Thurgood_Marshall and others note below, while the quote might be genuine, the sentiment was not.
So, I think it does a disservice when these kinds of quotes are used to suggest that LBJ was duplicitous and uncaring about black America. Personally, I have no doubt over the bona fides of LBJ's empathy and humanity after listening to the conversations in June of 1963 during the Freedom Summer disappearances, where LBJ was positively distraught.
It's also revealing that on July 24, 1964, Barry Goldwater met with LBJ in the White House to discuss the issue of race in the presidential campaigns. Goldwater suggested that both campaigns not address the issue of race in order to avoid inflaming racial tensions. LBJ strongly disagreed. There is no doubt from the presidential recordings that LBJ considered race problems to be an issue of morality, going so far as to compare the CRA of 1964 as a moral challenge similar to that facing the Lincoln administration over whether to pursue the 13th Amendment.
EDIT: Because it hasn't been mentioned yet, I will add that the source of the quotation, Ronald Kessler, is not what I would call an unbiased historian. Mr. Kessler has been the chief Washington correspondent for the far-right-wing Newsmax. He is known for incorrectly reporting that Barack Obama was present for Rev. Wright's "white arrogance" sermon, among other controversies. I'm not saying he's a bad journalist, and I'm not indicting his politics. I'm just saying that he comes to the table with his own biases.
TOP LEVEL EDIT: The more I consider the OP's quote in light of my own time listening to the recordings at the LBJ library at the University of Texas, the more I am convinced that LBJ is putting on an act to these two southern governors to quiet their rancor over his pursuit of the CRA. I think the statements in OP's quote directly conflict with Johnson's private understanding of just how transformative the CRA would be, both politically and legally.
Also, I think he absolutely knows, at the moment that he is smiling and assuring these good ole boys that their political future is secure, that he is actually about to end their careers, as well as the present and future careers of a great many other conservative democrats in the south (as reflected in the Moyers quote, above).
I won't begin to deny that LBJ was a ruthless political operator, and indeed, an unrepentant liar. But I cringe that this single quote, robbed of its context, would be used by some to imply that LBJ was a heartless racist manipulator. That's one notion that I think the historical record soundly disproves.
GOLD EDIT: Wow, much thanks. I can't believe my first gold post is littered with n-bombs.
[–][deleted]  (6 children)
[removed]
    [–][deleted]  (4 children)
    [removed]
      [–][deleted]  (1 child)
      [removed]
        [–]Thurgood_Marshall 23 points24 points25 points  (11 children)
        I think the best we can say is that the quote cited by OP is not inconsistent with LBJ's style.
        I disagree. Even though the language and frankness is consistent with LBJ, the sentiment isn't. His endgame was civil rights not simply perpetuating the power of his party.
        [–]x--BANKS--x 19 points20 points21 points  (0 children)
        I think you hit the nail squarely on the head, and I made an edit to make that more clear. I couldn't agree more.
        By "style", I chiefly mean rhetorical style, word usage, etc. I also mean "style" as in "modus operandi" -- in so far that it was typical LBJ to fake factional sympathies as a political technique.
        [–]liatris 1 point2 points3 points  (8 children)
        If civil rights was his end game then why did LBJ undermine Eisenhower's 1957 Civil Rights bill by removing the enforcement provisions basically making it toothless?
        [–]Thurgood_Marshall 1 point2 points3 points  (7 children)
        Because he didn't. Other Souther Dems did. LBJ did more for civil rights than any other president before and since.
        [–]liatris 0 points1 point2 points  (4 children)
        Other Souther Dems did.
        Which ones?
        [–]Thurgood_Marshall 2 points3 points4 points  (3 children)
        Eastland and Russell spearheaded it.
        [–]liatris 0 points1 point2 points  (2 children)
        Tell me the whole story as you see it. Where they bullied LBJ.
        [–]Thurgood_Marshall 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
        Oh please, LBJ hardly needs his civil rights record defended.
        [–]liatris 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
        Why don't you want to just quickly outline the story as you see it? If it's such an open and shut case then give a quick over view of how he was bullied by Eastland and Russell and had to give in to their demands despite his earnest desire not to.
        Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy (updated). © 2016 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
        REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
        π Rendered by PID 25679 on app-393 at 2016-05-06 01:06:48.607001+00:00 running 10e8ff3 country code: NL.
        Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies.  Learn More
        0%
        10%
        20%
        30%
        40%
        50%
        60%
        70%
        80%
        90%
        100%