This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]miqis980 -2ポイント-1ポイント * (2子コメント)

It means, in a nutshell, that Canada, the US and Mexico can trade goods at reduced costs/tariffs. For example, if I'm usually allowed to buy your movie tickets, but need to pay you $5 each time, NAFTA means I can buy them off you with no additional cost.

It's controversial because free trade, while great for businesses looking to outsource jobs for cheap and import goods at little cost (and republicans), free trade does nothing to keep jobs in a country. Since we're in a recession, people are looking for jobs. It does not help one bit that these jobs are probably being done in Canada or Mexico, and the manufactured goods being shipped in.

The opposite is protectionism, where everything is made and produced in one's own country, and international trade carries high levies and tariffs.

edits: sorry guys, i'm canadian :(

[–]hivoltage815 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wrong. Obama supports free trade and is even generally happy with NAFTA. source.

[–][deleted] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also, incorrect on the opposite of free trade, it's not nationalism, it's protectionism.