117
118

So long and farewell. (self.exmormon)

curious_mormonTruth never lost ground by enquiry. が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]FearlessFixxerEvil Apostate/Regular Dude...depends on who you ask 44ポイント45ポイント  (5子コメント)

If what u/curious_mormon says is true and u/4blockhead removed him without a discussion and vote from the other mods, then I think he should step down from his position.

Pure and simple.

Even if 4blockhead has a legitimate reason to remove curious, you cannot just make that move unilaterally.

This does not in anyway change the way I feel about Curious' dick move of posting the private mod conversations without blacking out names....

[–]JurassicParked 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

If nothing else, we should hold a DC for u/4blockhead and have him give the reasons he did it. Because in R/exmormon, the leaders should be held accountable to the members, the opposite of TSSC

[–]hear2fear 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

I agree, need some transparency here. The mods are here to make sure the sub stays a safe place for everyone involved, so what does it say when they can't even resolve their own little disagreements, de-evolve to personal attacks, and bring down a hammer on each other out of no where. So mods? Do you really have the future growth or safety of this sub in all our best interests and will you allow it to continue to prosper? Do you?

[–]vh65Addicted to Truth and Tea 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/4hv2u8/i_call_for_the_immediate_resignation_of/d2sn4g4

[–]hear2fear 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks, and I agree with you, the leak was bad form.

I see exactly where things started to break down from a discussion in the leak 12 days ago.

This is another area where your contrarianism is showing. -u4blockhead to curious_mormon

This was a petty comment and seemed to have set off curious_mormon and should have been taken offline before the hammer was brought down.

And blockheads excuse for removing him? A post got deleted that was a year old and violated the sub's rules? Ok, so what, discuss it and bring it back if need, but his reply at the end of the discussion.

I think you're burned out. I think it is time for you to go. I think the parting should be as amicable as possible.

Really??? It seems like some pride was pricked, he wanted an end of the discussion, he says "get out" in so many words with no consensus from the other mods This leaves a bad taste in my mouth in regards to u4blockhead.

So here is the crux of the current issue:

I disagree with the decision and the way it was handled.

Is this sub moderated by a panel of equal contributors or is it in the hands of one person who has final say on this type of decision?

You, as a mod, disagree with the method, this fact should be taken into account and u4blockhead should publicly apologize for the methods used. This sub should not be a dictatorship.

Not to excuse the extreme inappropriateness of the leak, but it most likely would not have happened had blockhead handled it differently.

Unfortunately curious_mormon burned his bridge by leaking the modmail.

[–]hasbrochem 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

At first reading some of your comments I was confused (this whole thing is still a bit confusing, honestly) but I get what you're saying now and agree 100% with you on this.