上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 245

[–]GigadickMegaballz [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

I'll be heading to the polls to vote the down ballot. I'll probably end up voting for trump.

[–]DonaldCruz [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

I'll probably end up voting for trump.

Probably? Why would you even consider someone else?

[–]SweatyMarco [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Nothing wrong with people sticking to their convictions. At least the person isn't staying home all together. I voted third party in 08.

[–]GigadickMegaballz [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I'm not really. I don't really like the libertarian candidates so I really just vote for trump because he's not Hillary and its just convenient for me.

[–]BarrettBuckeyeconstitutional conservative [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Austin Petersen is a good, conservative candidate. You should check him out.

[–]TreadNotOnMeConstitutional Conservative 47ポイント48ポイント  (23子コメント)

This is the most compelling reason to vote for him. For those who think the presidency is lost to someone who doesn't care much for small government, there's at least a chance we don't lose the Judiciary with Trump. A leftist Court today would use scores of AR-15s to blow the Constitution to hell before finally banning guns and transforming America into their utopian, anti-American, European/Australian vision.

I'm still on the fence, but this is something we really need to consider. Also, everyone should still go to the polls because while we'll probably lose the Senate (though Cruz/Lee/Rand will filibuster when it counts), we need to keep the House or you can say bye-bye to individual liberty.

[–]EMPEROR_TRUMP_2016 [スコア非表示]  (21子コメント)

Hillary said she'd consider Australia's gun "buy back" plan.

That alone is terrifying.

[–]hjwoolwine [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Man, yall are legit terrified of clinton.

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (48子コメント)

Yawn. This is not enough of a reason for me to vote for him. The choice is between a billionaire new york liberal who doesn't respect the constitution and a hundred-millionaire new york liberal who doesn't respect the constitution. She doesn't like guns, he doesn't like guns but pretends he does now. She won't overturn Roe V. Wade, he won't overturn Roe V. Wade. He seems to hate the first amendment, they both don't respect the fourth amendment. I was told that Obama would be taking my guns for 8 years now and it never even came close to happening. It won't with Trump or Hillary, either.

[–]TedyCruzHEREEE'S TEDYY [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Big Government NY Millionaire vs Big Government Liberal NY Millionaire..

I prefer higher tax on the rich than Can be taken away, Tariffs and protectionism will put us in a decade long recession.

Also Hillairy will bot destroy the Conservative movement.

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (30子コメント)

Then you don't understand the danger of the situation we're facing. This isn't about Scalia's old seat. It's about Scalia's seat and the two or three others that could come up in the next eight years. The court could be reshaped completely for a generation, whether liberal or conservative. This is legitimately one of the most important elections we'll see in our lifetime.

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

"the next 8 years"

So you are saying Hillary will do well enough to get re-elected? Every election is the most important election in our lifetime for one reason or another.

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

She could. Did any of us think there was any way in hell that Obama would be reelected?

[–]DonaldDrumpf16 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It was obvious Obama was going to be reelected in June, all the polling showed that. I know a lot of Republicans chose to ignore polling to their peril, and they are doing it with Trump now. Statistics aren't a liberal conspiracy though, and the sooner conservatives realize that the sooner we can actually win.

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Romney lost the minute he thought he could coast from that first good debate performance.

[–]forbin1992 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Hillary is way more beatable than Obama

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Agreed. Hell, she should be out of the race already. It's pathetic that people are still supporting her.

[–]Snake_7 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The whole reason we had Romney in 12 and seventeen in 16 says well enough the GOP thought that.

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I did, he was going against a guy who tried to bet someone 10,000 dollars live on TV over some trivial daily bullshit and was the person who implemented the inspiration for Obamacare in his state. He was doomed, even if his numbers were climbing just before the election. I think that either candidate will probably be a one-term president.

[–]DonaldDrumpf16 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I agree, both nominees are the two most historically unpopular nominees in our country's history, either one will be a one term president.

[–]Carpeaux [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Demographic shift. It's getting to the point that it doesn't matter how badly the democrats run the country to the ground, they will get elected every time because they have imported enough minorities to keep them in power indefinitely.

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

There it is again. This is the real problem: this idea that all minorities should be immediately written off because they are going to vote for democrats. Maybe instead of crying about the fact that the country is a little less white and Christian, Republicans could lift a fucking finger to try to convince them to vote the other way.

[–]lewlkewl [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Something interesting to note. Muslims used to vote republican pre-Bush quite a bit. They were hardcore reagan supporters, bush sr supporters, and even bush jr supporters (a lot of muslims HATED gore). It wasn't until the iraq war and the anti muslim sentiment that came from some republicans that they all flocked to democrats. Muslims, by nature, are more conservative than your average person. They side with republicans on a lot of social issues, and some economic ones was well (especially older generation), but it seems like the republican party wants to alienate those voters on purpose for some reason. Now, muslims aren't really a big voting bloc, but i think you get my point.

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I get your point loud and clear. I wish others did. This is kinda why Dominionists like Ted Cruz wouldn't have made good presidential candidates anyway. At some point we are going to have to learn to stay out of people's lives if what they believe in or are doing is not hurting anyone else.

[–]DonaldDrumpf16 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The solution to this is for the Republican party to start appealing to minorities, unfortunately with Trump we're going the opposite route.

[–]EndTimerLiberal [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is exactly the same argument Hillary's supporters furnish. You know what? In 4 or 8 years, there will still be old Justices who might die or retire, and THAT election will be "one of the most important".

The Supreme Court is now being used as a bargaining chip on both sides. Everything other than Scalia's seat is a hypothetical. "Cast aside your principals just this once, it's really important" is a really shit argument when it never changes.

[–]Saito1337TRUMP2016! [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

Tough luck. We told you we would never vote for him. This was not a joke or empty promise. His success or failure is on you guys.

[–]TheRealRobMonty [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Guys, my pride is more important than the future of the country. Sorry not sorry!

[–]DonaldDrumpf16 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Oh stop the fear mongering, there are a lot of old justices on both sides, in 4 years we can beat Hillary and undo whatever damage is done.

It's normal for the court and the presidency to shift back and forth over time, this isn't a reason to give up your conservative principles.

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You obviously haven't been paying attention to the cases headed to the SC.

[–]JexInfiniteTea Party Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It all changes with a liberal SCOTUS. We had bargaining power previously. That is lost.

[–]-CANT_STUMP_TRUMP- [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Trump has been consistent with his policies for his entire campaign. You are literally saying that "well he's lying and doesn't mean any of it" without credibility other then the fact that he was a liberal 20 years ago. And to say trump doesn't respect the constitution is pretty weird to say.

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Trump has been incoherent with his policies, not consistent. He has been consistent with talking about a wall, and that is it. We can watch and see if he drifts back toward the middle. You will see him downplaying talking about abortion. You will see him not caring about same sex marriage. You will see him not giving a shit about transgender bathroom bills. I don't care about any of that either, but I know a lot of people here do--- by the time the election gets here, his positions will be just as liberal as Hillary, and some of them to her left.

[–]BlG-TEX [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Socially, maybe. But you cant get anywhere nowadays by being a bible thumping evangelical.

[–]HillaryIsADemon [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Wasn't there a supreme Court case during obamas reign that was one vote away from denying your right to own a firearm and then merrick garland tried to re try the case or something. Be careful what you wish for with your guns lmao. If people didn't fight back your guns may very well have been gone already. Plus you sound like a pussy

[–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm glad you got all your facts together before commenting

[–]Irishfafnir [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I agree, Trump has remained consistently inconsistent on all of his policy positions with the exception of a wall along the border that seems questionable in terms of its effectiveness. Many of his proposals and rhetoric evokes xenophobia or are outright unconstitutional. He only became a conservative in the last few years I think if we elect Trump we will damage the conservative brand for decades to come, at least with Clinton we stand a very good chance of keeping her to a one term presidency enabling us to elect a true conservative who we won't be ashamed to tell our children that we voted for. As it stands now I will likely vote independent or just vote in state/local elections, but I will do some soul searching until election day and am open to arguments to voting for Trump.

[–]NOLA_haze [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

You know Trump and his family are ones of maybe a couple hundred people who carry regularly in Manhatten right?

[–]L8r_Space_Cowboy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is why conservatism is dying. You people can't see the big picture, all you care about is Roe V. Wade and other shit the public is in favor of. If you don't want an abortion don't have one; If you don't want your kids to have one, teach them about safe sex and contraception.

[–]degaman [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'll be casting my vote down the Libertarian rabbit hole in November.

[–]CatholicGuyConservative [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Seriously. This is not even that hard of a choice.

[–]Saito1337TRUMP2016! [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Yup, he's definitely not getting my vote.

[–]Cedsi [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

So did you lose a flair bet, or is that sarcasm? Haha

[–]weetchexLibertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

At this point, I'm pulling for Trump just so Cruz has a shot at Scalia's SCOTUS seat.

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It could be the best of all worlds. Trump gets and enemy to unite behind him, conservatives get a conservative justice, and the establishment gets Cruz out of the Senate.

[–]theFinisher4Ever [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

You honestly think Trump would nominate what he calls "the most dishonest man I've ever met" to the Supreme Court?

[–]BaeWhyYou#NeverCruz [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Yes. Tempers will cool, and Trump publicly lamented the prospect of Cruz as a justice all of two days ago.

[–]theFinisher4Ever [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

So then he was just lying? Cruz really isn't lyin Ted? This wasn't a spat about policy. This was a character judgement.

[–]etibbs [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If it comes down to a choice between Trump and Hillary this country is doomed. That's my 2 cents.

[–]DonaldDrumpf16 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Trump's famously vengeful, he'll do everything he can to sabotage Cruz's career from this point forward, definitely won't appoint him anywhere.

[–]Try_Another_NO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Trump's famously vengeful

No, he's not. Rubio was the one who probably attacked him the most harshly throughout the campaign. Trump has been floating his name for VP the last couple of weeks.

[–]catworld99 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Trump is extremely likely to pick Rubio as his running mate. Trump has said time and time again he doesn't hold grudges and after his opponents are defeated, they become friends. No reason to continue to hate each other. I think Cruz on supreme court with Trump is fairly likely.

[–]churlishmonk [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

you dont become a world famous negotiator and successful businessman by burning bridges. Trump's rhetoric is the embodiment of 'it's just business'. I fully expect him to extend the olive branch to all that ask

[–]BaeWhyYou#NeverCruz [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Is this the new meme bouncing around?

[–]TheRealRobMonty [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's the new angle the #NeverTrump Hillary supporters are taking. Not all of them are for her, but I don't think they realize they've been infiltrated

[–]JexInfiniteTea Party Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That would be a godsend, but is not likely to happen.

[–]Lord_Varys [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

So if we're AGAINST Trump, we'll get a Liberal SCOTUS.

But if we're FOR Trump, we'll get a statist, big-government POTUS.

Decisions decisions.

[–]6Women1Cruz [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You also get that from HRC if you are against Trump, tbf

[–]MicahRaptor [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Look, I'm a Never Trump guy.

Trump has to come out and say who he is nominating for the SCOTUS. If it's someone who is a Constitutional Conservative, he might win some people over.

If not, fuck him and fuck the Alt Right. At that point you're putting a revolver and a Glock in front of me and asking me to choose which one to shoot myself with, like it makes a lick of a fucking difference.

[–]Gobbue [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

100% agree. Trump's SCOTUS picks are the only way I will reconsider. I still don't know if I'd believe him though. Talk is cheap and the man has no record to rely on.

[–]freakincampers [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

Do we know what Trump actually stands for? For all we know Trump is simply pretending to be a Republican. Look at who Trump has donated money to.

[–]friendlyfire [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Oh, you mean like how Trump donated $5,000 to Ted Cruz?

That monster!

[–]EliPoo94 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

That's not what makes him a monster.

The thousands he gave to Pelosi, Reid, and Schumer is what makes him a monster, he helped destroy America. He's about as much as an insider as you can be.

[–]friendlyfire [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Trump has actually been relatively evenhanded in doling out cash to the two parties, but since 1989, he’s contributed over $350,000 more to Republicans running for federal and state offices, campaign finance records show.

Data from the Federal Election Commission and state elections offices provided by the two websites show that Trump has given $584,850 to Democrats and $961,140 to the GOP over the last 26 years.

Prior to 2012 he gave pretty evenly to both sides ($497,690 to Republicans and $581,350 to Democrats).

But the flow of cash from Trump to Democrats has fallen off; the last time he gave to a Democrat running for federal office was in 2010.

Since 2012 he has given $463,450 to Republicans and only $3,500 to Democrats.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jul/09/ben-ferguson/donald-trumps-campaign-contributions-democrats-and/

[–]papmontana [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How do you equate what someone did outside of politics as a business man to now?

It's not a hard concept to grasp. You oil the palms of those you need favors from.

[–]bass_wub [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Yes, that's why he has voted Republican his entire life.

[–]freakincampers [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Has he?

[–]bass_wub [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

[–]TropicalFishLover [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I thought our vote was private? Do they know for sure he actually pulled the lever for a republican or was he just "registered" as one.

[–]SpartanSword [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That's who he is registered with. I'm not 100% sure if the Primary was still closed in '13 and '10, as those are the only two primaries he voted in.

That document doesn't guarantee he voted R... but considering the '13 and '10 primaries...

[–]freakincampers [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He registered as a Republican, but did he actually vote?

[–]EliPoo94 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Voting is private, donations are not.

Most of his life, he's been funneling money to Democrats, it was only when he decided to run for President that he decided to stop funding the democrats.

[–]-Schwang- [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Before 2012 he donated to democrats and republicans fairly evenly, but since 2012 he has given $463,450 to Republicans and only $3,500 to Democrats. You can see the breakdown and source etc in the comment here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/4ht0uc/never_trump_liberal_scotus/d2shw4h

[–]BlG-TEX [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hes not a career politician, hes a very wealthy guy with a lot of friends. I doubt he donates money fpr political reasons.

[–]mastaxn [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

A liberal SCOTUS was a foregone conclusion when Trump became the presumptive nominee. There are far, far, far, too many of us that he has alienated with his demagoguery and the mockery he made of conservatism.

I don't think, even with the entire effort of his bloc of reddit supporters, you are going to be able to convince enough conservatives to vote for him. You will probably have better luck with the Bernie supporters.

[–]Talks_To_Themselves [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

As a Clinton supporter, seeing people like you in the conservative sub makes me really, really happy.

Welcome to the fold. Together we can stop this bigot and reshape America into a more equal and just society :)

[–]thatrightwingerUltimate Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I have no confidence that Trump will nominate solid conservative justices. I see him "negotiating" practical nominations. I see no benefit in that.

[–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Trump will cave on his nominee just like his boy Christie did in New Jersey.

[–]DoucheVader [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah well OH WELL. Trump should have thought of that before being a complete A-Hole Douchebag. He didn't close the deal with me, he didn't close the deal with conservatives. He didn't secure the base which was the same mistake Mitt made.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/24/ill-take-hillary-clinton-over-donald-trump/#.VyVnP_D2N_M.facebook

[–]jdw101 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's insane to let Hillary have the white house. We just can't do it anymore, at least Donald will take care of immigration for fucks sake. We need something done NOW.

[–]Parrallax91 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Immigration? Isn't Trump's policy (We'll let the good ones back) just a cleaner term for amnesty? That and unless Trump builds a Great Wall sized Great Wall with camera turrets, that wall is getting Jack done.

[–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I know it is a hard pill for some to swallow, but that is our choices.

Nah - always a third choice. Take it from Trump! There's always the third party option.

[–]EliPoo94 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Haha that's what Trump would've had us do if he lost the nomination!

[–]NeverNeverTrump [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Well there are always other options in life. Instead of raising my family right and making hard decision on the budget I could just become a crackwhore and throw responsibility out the window.

[–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Like Trump wants to do with entitlements!

[–]malibu31 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Not going to lie, I was getting upset at times from some conservatives on here with Never Trump attitudes. Part of me gets it, but the other part couldn't fathom why would they rather have Clinton in the WH.

Now I'm in a time of reflection of this primary season. I do sympathize with those same conservatives because I know what it's like to lose a major election (Obama twice). I want to help bring them all on board (and a few have already and that's great) because that will create a force never seen on the GOP side since the 80s and it will be a beautiful thing. Trump will work with Congress because he is a good negotiator and has gotten things done (track record).

Now you have the right to pick whomever you want in the general. I respect that. I'm not going to frown upon those who exercise their constitutional right. I would like to see some (I know all won't, but we can try) conservatives stand behind Trump so we can stop the liberal entourage that is spreading across the world.

All in all, we may not see eye-to-eye, but I hope we can all agree on the fact that Crooked Hillary will damage this party & country much more than Trump would (IMO, Trump makes both stronger). When it comes to the social issues, he will keep it to a local level, not a nationwide one-size-fits-all level.

By the way, Cruz was a hell of a competitor.

Edit: so many spelling and grammatical I errors. It's like I didn't learn English

[–]Saito1337TRUMP2016! [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Sorry, but no we cannot agree that she is worse. It's a nice attempt at outreach but for many of us we told you never and we meant never. There is nothing that changes that.

[–]papmontana [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

How is the woman that arguably has deaths on her conscience, not even looking at her voting record, worse than Trump?

It blows my mind that people don't understand the type of woman she is. She's a liar, panderer, the definition of a corrupt politician. The cut your nose to spite your face type of stupidity.

Hillary Clinton: Takes millions in speaking fees from Wall Street while pretending to speak for the little people, then says she doesn't know what Bernie Sanders means by "the establishment", says she's not a part of it. Transmits classified intelligence over unsecured channels...then joked during a press conference about wiping her server clean "with a cloth or something"...and laughs off everything she doesn't want to talk about in general...including when she was asked by a reporter whether she would release the transcript from her paid speeches at Goldman Sachs. Is said, by an ex Wall Street trader with 20 years of experience, to have turned the Democratic Party "from a party against Wall Street to a party of Wall Street". Sends her daughter to lie about her opponent's health care program...and to speak to NYC fundraisers hosted by Wall Street bankers, where attendees can "pay $2700 for a picture" with her. Has a son-in-law who is an ex Goldman Sachs investment banker and hedgefund co-founder. Voted for the invasion of Iraq. Voted for the PATRIOT Act. Voted for the 2006 reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act. Voted for the 2001 Bankruptcy Legislation which would have made it harder for struggling Americans to declare bankruptcy, after expressing her opposition to the bill when she was First Lady. Believed that marriage was defined as between a man and woman and reversed her position only in 2013 when it became politically convenient. Received millions in shady donations for her foundation while she was Secretary of State...the same foundation whose donors got weapons deals when she was Secretary of State. Makes her fans wait hours for a five-minute speech...while she gives closed doors fundraisers for rich donors. Doesn't support clemency for Edward Snowden. Wants a "Manhattan Project" to break encryption and force tech companies to plant backdoors in their products. Praised the repeal of Glass-Steagall. Supports the TPP. Took donations from federally registered lobbyists or PACs for private prison companies until October 2015. Opposes decriminalizing marijuana, and, despite naming the pharmaceutical industry as one of her greatest "enemies", has received more money from drug companies than any other candidate this cycle

But it's "NeverTrump" because it's a movement or something.

[–]Talks_To_Themselves [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

As a Clinton supporter, seeing people like you in the conservative sub makes me really, really happy.

Welcome to the fold. Together we can stop this bigot and reshape America into a more equal and just society :)

[–]causeoffaction 8ポイント9ポイント  (19子コメント)

Never Trump has about 30 members at this point, dropping down to around 4 come November. They help Trump by further painting him as the bipartisan outsider. So let them pout, more free publicity

[–]Rommel79Conservative [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I wasn't ever #NeverTrump, but I am a solidly Cruz guy. That being said, I'll take Trump over Hillary any day of the week.

[–]causeoffaction [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm similar to you, just Trump-leaning. I actually used to be close to joining Never Trump, and I can tell you firsthand that they truly believe they are philosophically perfect on every policy.

Then I realized how stupid that was and joined the winning team.

Trust me. They'll be voting for Trump.

[–]TrumpDestroyCruzPlsLibertarian Nationalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They are probably Hillary shills

[–]GuitarWizard90 8ポイント9ポイント  (11子コメント)

Some people here act like NeverTrump is this massive movement. Newsflash...it's not. If it were that huge, Trump wouldn't be winning so easily. I guess if you have no life, and are on here 24/7, it may create the illusion that this sub somehow represents the views of conservatives throughout the country. I'm not seeing much of this NeverTrump bullshit in real life. Some of the most right-wing conservative people that I know, are behind Trump now.

[–]NotAnotherEmpire [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

NeverTrump isn't exactly the Reddit demographic. Same as how BernieBroBots can't fathom how their candidate can be so omnipresent and then get smashed. The 42 year-old housewife in the Milwaukee or Columbus suburb McMansion isn't (generally) shitposting on this site.

[–]Roez [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

You're right. I don't believe it's a huge massive movement, and the treatment you guys dished out during the election implies you don't think we're that important either. That means, if Trump loses in November it's all on you--which it has been all along anyway.

Please don't worry about it from here out. You can all stop the calls to unite the party. Trump, as you say, has already done that. Case over.

[–]NeverNeverTrump [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You can't get salty all the time then blame us when we get a little salty back. Let's all just calm down

[–]causeoffaction [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You'll all vote for Trump and you damn well know it. That's why every one of your people's post history is just endless Trump butthurt. Not exactly the mark of apathetic, stay-at-home non-voters.

[–]jettj14Libertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Exactly. In the same breath they say we don't need Never Trumpers, but then they say it will be NeverTrump's fault if Trump loses in November. Which is it? You can't have both.

I personally think Trump doesn't need NeverTrump. For months he's been saying that he's bringing so many people to the Republican party, which is why we should nominate him. I say great. If he's right, then NeverTrump can vote with their conscience and Hillary will still lose. That's a win-win, right?

[–]JexInfiniteTea Party Conservative [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Trump is bringing more people out to vote than are refusing to vote for him.

[–]jettj14Libertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Which is exactly what I said. Why are some up in arms over NeverTrump then? They aren't even a factor if what Trump says is true.

[–]Try_Another_NO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Because I want to see a map of the US painted red when I wake up the morning after election day.

[–]AceOfSpades70Libertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Maybe within the GOP but not with GE voters.

[–]EliPoo94 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm really active in my local GOP and I know a ton of #NeverTrump activist types.

Then again, I live in Texas, and Cruz is pretty popular around here

[–]xDok [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If it's not really that big, then stop worrying about how we refuse to vote for Trump.

[–]NewWahoo [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Well, I know 3 of them.

Called three pals who are reliable GOP voters. Volunteer and donate too, every cycle. One said if its close he'll vote Clinton, other two said they would vote independent.

[–]causeoffaction [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

"said"

I call bullshit. Talk is cheap. But since they talk like liberals anyway, so I encourage them to do so. Just drop the "reliable GOP voter" moniker so we can stop pretending.

[–]NewWahoo [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Just drop the "reliable GOP voter" moniker so we can stop pretending.

I mean, what else do you call someone who has voted GOP for ever office, in every cycle, their whole lives? And, like I said, volunteered and donated.

[–]causeoffaction [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why don't you take them at their word and call them two independents and a Clinton voter.

[–]Snake_7 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

For what it's worth, I liked Ted Cruz because of his support of Rand Paul during the drone filibusters. Rand/Cruz were my choices before Trump entered the race. I understand the polarizing sides, because I would've picked Gary Johnson or something had Trump been denied the nomination much like I hear Bernouts picking Jill Stein and GOP hardliners saying they'll look elsewhere.

However, unity needs to happen now. If Trump fizzled, if Cruz surged, if Mitt Romney was picked, it doesn't matter because this election became far more important for our future than "sticking it to the GOP" (from either crowd) when Scalia passed away unexpectedly.

We're voting for the legislative, executive and the judicial branch this time. DC v. Heller is not a dead issue.

[–]Tenorek [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

You know what, fuck your unity. Trump is a shrewd man leading a cadre of imbeciles that will believe everything he says. That's his support base, and I don't consider myself a part of it. He is going to have to convince me now more than ever to support him. I see very little difference between the two front runners, except what he SAYS. Talk is cheap, and from I have seen, Trump knows exactly what to SAY to gullible people. I don't believe for a second he has any intention of doing what he says.

[–]papmontana [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What has he said that you have issues with?

[–]parkoworkLibertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

cadre of imbeciles

gullible people

Why would Trump supporters even bother with you, when you've made it clear what you think of them?

[–]yzass [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

With Trump at the top of the ticket, the Democrats will gain control of the Senate. As Trump says he's a deal maker( and now a closet liberal) so he will appoint someone the Democrats will approve. SCOTUS will become more liberal either way.

[–]johnpershing [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

It goes beyond that, although your points are very good. Trump will be hard on immigration while she will keep the flood gates opened. He will also greatly lower corporate taxes which is a huge reason why businesses leave. Say what you want about Trump and his social stances, he knows business and capitalism and will help restore it.

[–]TropicalFishLover [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Right he says he will yet staffs his empire with visa workers. Comical.

[–]johnpershing [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hillary slept while Benghazi burned. We can play this game all day pal.

[–]jac5 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

the candidate who CLAIMS he is for a National CCW and against most abortion

Claims this week, you mean.

[–]TropicalFishLover [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah Trump was so for good gun control before he was not... then add in the whole abortion thing of which he has flipped flopped so many times on too...

[–]Saito1337TRUMP2016! [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The answer is still no and always will be, no.

[–]swifty12345 [スコア非表示]  (19子コメント)

trump would named his sister as possible replacement. he even named a TV judge who hasn't been a judge for a while as possible replacement. so trump = LIBERAL SCOTUS!

[–]No_stop_signs [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

Trump may result in a liberal SCOTUS. Clinton definitely will. There are no other options. No other GOP candidate can win the general.

Once Clinton takes your guns, you'll have nothing left to defend the rest of your rights when she comes for them too. And even if a future conservative president could fix the mess, that would be impossible too because amnesty and irresponsible immigration will ensure that doesn't happen again.

You're standing at a crossroads.

[–]JexInfiniteTea Party Conservative [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

If Clinton tries to take guns away, the second amendment will finally become relevant.

[–]TedyCruzHEREEE'S TEDYY [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

His Son has already hinted at VP spot, Trump/Trump ticket!

I wish I was making this shit up.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/01/don-jr-suggests-donald-trump-donald-trump-ticket-instagram/

[–]TropicalFishLover [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

He mocked me along with millions of others... so yeah Trump and his supporters can go pound sand for all I care. I have pride... my vote is still of value to me. Trump has done NOTHING to earn mine. Some of you all might be cheap dates and willing to hand yours over, but I am not.

[–]DonaldDrumpf16 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The court swings back and forth, I'm not giving up my principals for one justice (who if Trump nominates won't be conservative anyway).

[–]redartist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

1 justice? Check the ages of sitting justices and average life expectancy in the US. Odds are another one dies before November.

[–]swifty12345 [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

so which candidate is against second amendment and against abortion?

because both trump and Hillary hate the 2nd amendment and abortion!

[–]tondollari [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Where do you get the idea that Trump isn't pro second amendment?

[–]TimbuFTZB [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He pulled that one firmly out of his ass.

[–]e12012012 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

After Newtown, he tweeted praise for Obama's response.

[–]swifty12345 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I wonder where you get the idea that he is pro second amendment.

trump is a LIAR!

he supported abortion and gun control FOR years suddenly he pivots? what make u think he wont pivot again.

he just wants to be president and put that on his bucket-list, he realized with the anger in the country aimed at Obama, the best way to become president is running as a republican by playing a conservative

[–]Gutred [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Here are Trump's pro-second amendment stances on gun control. Read it or, if you're not capable, have someone dictate it to you and explain the more difficult words.

Meanwhile, Hillary has said she has no problem using executive action to pass gun laws, which would no doubt hurt our right to bear arms.

[–]swifty12345 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

omg he said it on his website! it is absolutly true!

what about his history? his support for assault weapon bans. his gun free buildings!

but now i am supposed to trust a peace of html code in the interwebz?