Here's the post. Let's translate together, because I'm not going in all alone:

I’ve forgotten where I saw the quote posted, so I’ll paraphrase it a bit (I think it may have been Illimitable Man),

Always start an informative article with an admittance that you're too lazy to go look for a quote that you're referencing. It inspires confidence.

but there’s a new concept I read about how human beings’ experience of consciousness is now assuming a new, third, aspect – the immediate, the internal and now, the virtual.

Sophocles was so dumb without a computer.

The immediate experience is one in which you directly relate with people in real time. It’s you physically and vocally interacting with others.

Deaf people, on the other hand, must rely on clocks to determine what's immediate and what isn't.

The internal is the conversations you have with yourself and both your conscious and subconscious interpretation of what you’re experiencing, learning, behaving, etc. (i.e. what you’re thinking).

I'm thinking that I can behave an object because I have little understanding of the English language beyond some vague idea of parallel structure.

However, the virtual (or digital) aspect of consciousness is something humans have only recently developed and are now on the cutting edge of really understanding.

I thought humans would understand the virtual aspect of consciousness before developing it, but then asked a deaf man for his watch so I could understand how time progresses.

The virtual experience is what I’m doing now as I type this post.

My other hand, though, is engaged in another type of experience.

I’m relating to you what’s going on in my thought process (to the degree of which I’m aware of it) in a virtual medium.

This differs from the printing press because reasons.

Virtual porn, virtual games, virtual shopping, etc., really anything you do in a digital realm is part of this new form of ‘being’.

After consulting a dictionary, I've discovered that things on the interwebs constitute virtual forms of comparable things. My argument here is literally how the word "virtual" functions.

Humans in 2016 experience things in ways that our forebearers could scarcely dream of.

So I ask myself, will our sense of being be comparably tiny compared to people in 2516 or 3016? Nahhh, I'm the peak of humanity. Right here.

Our immediate and internal experiences are now being informed by out virtual experiences

Unlike other experiences, that we're entirely disconnected from.

– in accelerated ways that I don’t think most people really appreciate.

I am so smrt.

The Feminine Imperative is now fighting to establish a foothold in this virtual experience.

I capitalize bullshit to make it seem legit. See r/whiterights for similar techniques.

Thus, we see efforts like GamerGate meant to lock down a control over how men will be allowed to experience this virtual reality.

I'm an alpha! We don't act like victims.

We also see the preliminary efforts to both socially and legislatively institute feminine-primary controls over yet to be developed possibilities of virtual experiences.

I actually came up with this sentence playing Mad-Libs. Isn't it amazeballs!?

Jerking off to ubiquitous, free, online porn is one such experience that the Feminine Imperative has had to play catch-up to with regard to restricting men’s access to it.

Women are going to take away free porn. I shit you not. With all the issues women and feminists in general face today, they're going to make sure that people pay for porn. They don't want to make it illegal. They're just concerned that there's so much damned piracy going on. The nurse is offering me pills now. They look like rabbits.

And thus, we get contingent social controls from the imperative to counter this lack.

Nurse, does this sentence make any sense? Nurse where are you? How about you, Sam? Could you stop eating your foot and look at what I wrote?

It’s not enough that men be shamed for their sexual response to online porn.

Here is a list of all the women in the entire Northern Hemisphere who shame men for getting an erection while viewing porn:

• That one woman I met in a Denny's in 1995

The accessibility makes this impractical, but there’s really no ‘sales’ transaction for which men would feel their sexual “weakness” being exploited.

I'm not a bad writer; you're all just dumb.

However, the counter to this then becomes making men’s sexuality itself a disease.

You might think that I structured this epistle quite intentionally but it's actually just a short reference to a philosophy textbook, random thoughts from my angry self, and some bizarre justification of my inability to stop looking at porn.

“Porn Addiction”, sex addiction, in a religious context even ‘impure thoughts’ become a disease not to be cured, but to be managed by women – women’s definitions, women’s approvals and disapprovals, women’s sexual strategy interests.

The key to being Alf is to focus with great intensity onto what society thinks and be petty and short-sighted about how that makes you feel.

Also, I'm blaming modern women for how religion has influenced our culture over hundreds of years. Because the damned nurse won't bring me my vodka! Nurse!?!

And porn is just the tip of the iceberg with regard to the Feminine Imperative’s controls of men’s virtual experiences with women.

Sources:

• Scribblings of mine on an old San Diego tourist map
• The Constitutional Law Center of My Ass
• Projection: How To Use It and Be Obvious About It (Random House, 1966)