12
13

Craig Wright lied to economist.com , Proof included: (self.Bitcoin)

fluffy1337 が 投稿

"He also says he can’t send any bitcoin because they are now owned by a trust."

http://www.economist.com/news/briefings/21698061-craig-steven-wright-claims-be-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin

1) Meanwhile 15 months have gone by since Dave Kleiman died, therefore Craig Wright is the sole owner of the coins and may use them at his discretion:

The contract stipulates that if Kleiman should die, “Dr Wright will be returned shares in the Tulip trust and company 15 months after my death at his discretion.”

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2644014-Tulip-Trust-Redacted.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman Dave Kleiman (1967 – April 26, 2013)

2) Additionally according to the trust Dr Wright may request a loan of bitcoin for various reasons, which he can then use to prove his identity. So he could just "borrow" some coins and then simply return said coins once he has proven his identity.

"Dr Wright MAY request a loan of Bitcoin for the following reasons (and no others):

Furthering research into peer to peer systems, and Bitcoin

Commercial activities that enhance the value and position of Bitcoin."

Edit: better quality trust document: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2644014/Tulip-Trust-Redacted.pdf

See also: see also: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hm5l1/telling_craig_wright_deflected_question_about/

TLDR: Craig Wright has full access to the coins in the trust according to the contract before us. His claim that he cant send any bitcoins cannot be true.

全 6 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]NervousNorbert [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The coins have been "moved" to a trust, so Wright no longer has access to them. He can request a loan, meaning a part of the coins will be "moved" to him and have to be "moved back" later. All of this happens without a single coin moving on the blockchain.

Bullshit.

[–]fluffy1337[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

He owns the trust though , since he is the sole shareholder. They are no longer locked until 2020 since Kleiman died in 2013 and 15 months have expired.

The contract stipulates that if Kleiman should die, “Dr Wright will be returned shares in the Tulip trust and company 15 months after my death at his discretion.”

[–]fluffy1337[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

News that he now intends to move some coins: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36193006

He seems to have contradicted what he previously told the economist.com

[–]ethought [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

The trust document does not specify he can take a loan to prove he is Satoshi...? It is debatable whether either of the two conditions that are specified in the document would make it possible for him to take a loan simply to prove he is Satoshi.

[–]fluffy1337[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Regardless Dave Kleiman died in 2013 and its been 15 months since then, so as the sole shareholder Craig Wright can do whatever he wants.

The contract stipulates that if Kleiman should die, “Dr Wright will be returned shares in the Tulip trust and company 15 months after my death at his discretion.”

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2644014/Tulip-Trust-Redacted.pdf

[–]michelmx [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

good point

that contract will probably be fake just like the rest of CW's story