あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]3sidedsword -2ポイント-1ポイント  (8子コメント)

[–]dis_is_my_account 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

[–]3sidedsword 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

What kind of retarded sub is that? Do you all sit around telling yourself that everything is real? Do you cry when your precious stories and may mays are called fake?

[–]dis_is_my_account -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

I cry for at least an hour when anything is called fake. But seriously, it's just a place to show how ridiculous the cynists on here get to try to prove something as fake. Not everything is fake either and if you stopped trying to look at the world through cynicism, you'd see that the world isn't all that incredibly boring.

[–]3sidedsword 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

Do you honestly believe that even half of these kind of posts are real? Someone just happened to be wearing the right clothes that perfectly matched their environment huh? How retarded can you be? This is why people like you will always be cucks. You can't see what's right in front of you. Then when you're given proof it's not good enough. Now go back to lala land where everything is $100% true.

[–]dis_is_my_account 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

You can't see what's right in front of you. Then when you're given proof it's not good enough.

That's a little funny coming from an /r/conspiracy subscriber. I also haven't seen all that much proof from the fellas over at /r/thathappened

[–]3sidedsword 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

/r/conspiracy looks at all evidence but when it's obvious that ours outweighs the "evidence" from the other side. /r/thathappened doesn't need prove. It shouldn't need to. They're very obviously fake and anybody who can't see that is blind. Now this conversation has just devolved into attacks based on where I post and I'm not going to sit here and be attacked based on stereotypes about me. You can fuck off because I won't be talking to you.

[–]dis_is_my_account -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

If it's obvious then it should be easy to prove it. As for conspiracy, most evidence aIve seen comes from sources with a very obvious intent on altering the report to make you come to the same conclusion they did. Or it's just straight up anecdotal evidence alot of the time.

[–]3sidedsword 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Didn't you hear me? I'm not talking to you. Shoo.