50
51

Anarcho-capitalism is impossible. Capitalism requires an indisputable defender of property rights, called a state. (self.CapitalismVSocialism)

Katie4321Slightly to the left of Karl Marx が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト (提案されたアイデア)
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Madphilosopher3Market Anarchist [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

Moral truth? Are you saying morality is absolute? Are you saying that certain values are absolute, and not subjective?

I don't know what you mean by "absolute" value. I am saying that there are intrinsic values that are universal to all living things though and that compromise is the best and most moral means of maximizing positive intrinsic value and minimizing negative intrinsic value.

One of my moral values is non-negotiability. How do you propose resolving a dispute with me? I don't believe in negotiation in the first place.

That's not a moral value, it's an immoral value. You value your freedom to behave in immoral ways.

[–]Katie4321Slightly to the left of Karl Marx[S] [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

I am saying that there are intrinsic values that are universal to all living things though

Tell that to Ludwig von Mises!

…it is obvious that the appeal to justice in a debate concerning the drafting of new laws is an instance of circular reasoning. De lege ferenda there is no such thing as justice. The notion of justice can logically only be resorted to de lege lata. It makes sense only when approving or disapproving concrete conduct from the point of view of the valid laws of the country…There is no such thing as an absolute notion of justice not referring to a definite system of social organization. It is not justice that determines the decision in favor of a definite social system. It is, on the contrary, the social system which determines what should be deemed right and what wrong

Right and wrong depends on the social system? The social system determines right and wrong, it's not some universal truth?

Try harder. Don't tell me I know more about ancapism than you!

[–]Madphilosopher3Market Anarchist [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Right and wrong depends on the social system?

Nope. There are right and wrong answers to questions of what produces human flourishing.

[–]Katie4321Slightly to the left of Karl Marx[S] [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

So are you contradicting the conclusions of Human Action? That the social system determines what "right and wrong" (i.e., morality) is? That different social systems can determine different forms of morality?

[–]Madphilosopher3Market Anarchist [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

People who agree on their political/economic philosophies don't automatically agree on their moral philosophies as well.

[–]Katie4321Slightly to the left of Karl Marx[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

You said

there are intrinsic [moral] values that are universal to all living things

Ludwig von Mises does not agree with you. He says that the social system determines the moral values for that social system. And who knows what happens if you don't even have a social system. I guess anything goes if you don't have a social system.

[–]Madphilosopher3Market Anarchist [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Everyone values happiness. No one values involuntary suffering. Happiness is intrinsically valuable.

[–]Katie4321Slightly to the left of Karl Marx[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Now I know you're just a troll! You never answered the question. You contradict your own ancap "heroes", that I apparently know about more than you, and you just ignore the contradiction. Bye troll

[–]Madphilosopher3Market Anarchist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You're the only troll here. Downvoting and avoiding actual debate. I don't agree with Mises, so what? That's not the issue.