Drama 内の Pazians によるリンク Got banned from game of thrones subreddit a week before the new season. For no reason, I've been accused of objectifying women to having unhealthy obsessions to young girls.

[–]Pazians[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

after my discussion with the mods where they failed to show me where I broke the rules, muted me and gave me a full ban. that's not fair.

trees 内の samurai-samuel によるリンク Can we all just take a second to laugh at how stupid this is please

[–]Pazians -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol nothing stops people from making wax. it's about as dangerous as charcoal grilling. and there other ways of extracting concentrates without using butane

people burn themselves cooking too should we regulate cooking?

trees 内の samurai-samuel によるリンク Can we all just take a second to laugh at how stupid this is please

[–]Pazians 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm just worried about my toddler doing shots and all that's going on

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

you know YouTube videos is a reliable source right? you're being ridiculous. you haven't looked through all of that. and Those 24 points are all valid. you can not just ignore that. like what do you honestly expect?

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has committed fraud by releasing this unscientific report. Here is one of the many examples into the agency's coverup of 9-11-2001 and the link to 24 other provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself–including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be investigated.


Technical Statement:

NIST's draft WTC 7 report said,

“Most of the beams and girders were made composite with the slabs through the use of shear studs. Typically, the shear studs were 0.75 inches in diameter by 5 inches long, spaced 1 to 2 feet on center.”

However, in the final WTC 7 report, NIST says shear studs were not used on the girders. The significance here is that they claim the 13th floor A2001 girder was pushed off its seat at column 79 by thermally expanded beams from the east side of the building. If shear studs had been used on the girders, it would have been impossible for the beams to push the girder off its seat with the column. No drawings are shown in the final report to substantiate this new claim.

In their WTC 7 model, NIST does not heat the concrete, only the steel. The implication is then made that the shear studs in the beams are broken due to differential expansion of the steel and concrete, allowing the beams to freely expand and force the now non -shear-studded girder off its seat at column 79, causing floors 12 and lower surrounding column 79 to collapse, leaving the column without sufficient lateral support and causing it to become unstable and to buckle. Concrete has nearly the same Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) as steel and would expand and contract at almost the same rate when heated or cooled. There is no analysis or any attempt to justify the position that the steel would have heated up to a greater degree than the concrete and produced a differential expansion. No physical testing was done to investigate the actual behavior of the materials involved; only computer modeling was performed without increasing the temperature of the concrete at all.

(Here's an interview with Kamal Obeid, C.E., S.E., a 30-year structural engineer, explaining how NIST's analysis actually disproves it's own theories on how WTC Building 7 collapsed, thereby confirming the use of controlled demolition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WCcSHpvAJ8)


Sources: https://www.ae911truth.org/images/articles/2014/11/twenty-five-points-10-19-14-3.pdf

• NIST NCSTAR 1-1 (Draft), p. 14 http://web.archive.org/web/20051219234553/wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-1.pdf

• NCSTAR 1-1A, pp. 49, 50

• NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.1, pp. 15, 341-360

• NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.2, pp. 529, 534, 535, 546, 561, 603, 615


Unfamiliar with Building 7 and/or NIST?

Check out these qualified professional's opinions on WTC 7 / NIST report:

  • 1999 Presidential Medal of Science award winner, Lynn Margulis PhD, says NIST has released an unscientific and fraudulent report: Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0fkDmi78Og

  • Dr. Bob Bowman (Lt. Col. Ret) and former head of the Star Wars program under Presidents Ford and Carter has multiple engineering degrees and agrees that NIST is conducting a massive coverup. Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CROB5p-1GjE

  • Did you know the Dutch Demolition Expert, Danny Jawenko concluded that building 7 was a controlled demolition? Interview: https://youtu.be/pJHxG9EVjtk

R.I.P. to all 3 of these brave souls.


Please visit the website supported by over 2,200 Architects and Engineers, 9/11 victims and their family members at www.RememberBuilding7.org and their new campaign at www.ReThink911.org — More about ReThink911's recent success: Ben Swann Truth in Media: More Americans "Rethinking" 9/11?

C-SPAN interviewed these architects and engineers just this past August 1st, about Building 7 and other demolition evidence and the episode has already garnered over 315,000 views and counting, becoming the most popular video hosted on their website all time.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

your first point, I know I just said it was annoying and I even admitted it being a lame thing to complain about. eh people want argue with me and bring up points let them I'm allowed to reply to them, since they decided to reply to me.

my very first comment was reasonable.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

it borders on personal attack I mean that is a lame thing to complain about but if I'm being civil it's annoying as fuck getting cursed at. I don't think it's an autistic behavior. seems like people are just trying to conjure up any problem with me

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

so I can't defend myself to people who directly message me? especially when I have an answer. especially when I haven't been offensive and have provided sources. while I've been getting cursed at? really? I'm the asshole that's stirring shit with my level headed opinion that I backed up with sources.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

we were arguing about the metal point and the. you started going off in a completely different direction trying to persuade me on a different point... well maybe you should take a look. it's sources so I don't look crazy. you have devolved the convo into nothing now. I don't even know what your main problem is? you have been the crazy offensive one.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

now you just want to argue to whole topic of 9/11 ? alright.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has committed fraud by releasing this unscientific report. Here is one of the many examples into the agency's coverup of 9-11-2001 and the link to 24 other provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself–including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be investigated.


Technical Statement:

NIST's draft WTC 7 report said,

“Most of the beams and girders were made composite with the slabs through the use of shear studs. Typically, the shear studs were 0.75 inches in diameter by 5 inches long, spaced 1 to 2 feet on center.”

However, in the final WTC 7 report, NIST says shear studs were not used on the girders. The significance here is that they claim the 13th floor A2001 girder was pushed off its seat at column 79 by thermally expanded beams from the east side of the building. If shear studs had been used on the girders, it would have been impossible for the beams to push the girder off its seat with the column. No drawings are shown in the final report to substantiate this new claim.

In their WTC 7 model, NIST does not heat the concrete, only the steel. The implication is then made that the shear studs in the beams are broken due to differential expansion of the steel and concrete, allowing the beams to freely expand and force the now non -shear-studded girder off its seat at column 79, causing floors 12 and lower surrounding column 79 to collapse, leaving the column without sufficient lateral support and causing it to become unstable and to buckle. Concrete has nearly the same Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) as steel and would expand and contract at almost the same rate when heated or cooled. There is no analysis or any attempt to justify the position that the steel would have heated up to a greater degree than the concrete and produced a differential expansion. No physical testing was done to investigate the actual behavior of the materials involved; only computer modeling was performed without increasing the temperature of the concrete at all.

(Here's an interview with Kamal Obeid, C.E., S.E., a 30-year structural engineer, explaining how NIST's analysis actually disproves it's own theories on how WTC Building 7 collapsed, thereby confirming the use of controlled demolition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WCcSHpvAJ8)


Sources: https://www.ae911truth.org/images/articles/2014/11/twenty-five-points-10-19-14-3.pdf

• NIST NCSTAR 1-1 (Draft), p. 14 http://web.archive.org/web/20051219234553/wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-1.pdf

• NCSTAR 1-1A, pp. 49, 50

• NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.1, pp. 15, 341-360

• NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.2, pp. 529, 534, 535, 546, 561, 603, 615


Unfamiliar with Building 7 and/or NIST?

Check out these qualified professional's opinions on WTC 7 / NIST report:

  • 1999 Presidential Medal of Science award winner, Lynn Margulis PhD, says NIST has released an unscientific and fraudulent report: Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0fkDmi78Og

  • Dr. Bob Bowman (Lt. Col. Ret) and former head of the Star Wars program under Presidents Ford and Carter has multiple engineering degrees and agrees that NIST is conducting a massive coverup. Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CROB5p-1GjE

  • Did you know the Dutch Demolition Expert, Danny Jawenko concluded that building 7 was a controlled demolition? Interview: https://youtu.be/pJHxG9EVjtk

R.I.P. to all 3 of these brave souls.


Please visit the website supported by over 2,200 Architects and Engineers, 9/11 victims and their family members at www.RememberBuilding7.org and their new campaign at www.ReThink911.org — More about ReThink911's recent success: Ben Swann Truth in Media: More Americans "Rethinking" 9/11?

C-SPAN interviewed these architects and engineers just this past August 1st, about Building 7 and other demolition evidence and the episode has already garnered over 315,000 views and counting, becoming the most popular video hosted on their website all time.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

no if you want to dissect it fine? that comment was a reply to someone who used the jetfuel can't melt steel beam as an example to "crazier" theories about 9/11 same with bush.

I replied saying, hey here's a reason why bush might be implicated to a point and here is a better perspective of the jet fuel can't melt steel beams arguement.

I sound so level headed and reasonable. i mean this is a post about the recent news of Saudi Arabia funding 9/11. something I've personally said for years.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

yes because nist illegally destroyed 80 percent of the evidence we will never know the composition of the metal.. maybe if they spent more money investigating 9/11 while avoiding illegal actions people wouldn't have questions. like why was there molten metal? why are you so offensive?

I'm being polite and reasonable. you just should learn how to have discussions.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

how am I rambling? my comment was way shorter then yours. That was a reasonable comment. nothing about it was incoherent. what narrative am I trying to perpetuate? I'm talking about a situation and how it could of been handled differently and legally. avoiding arguements like these that can fall either way.

worldnews 内の acupoftwodayoldcoffe によるリンク Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

[–]Pazians -7ポイント-6ポイント  (0子コメント)

well the simple fact is we will never know the compostiton of the steel because nist illegally destroyed 80% of the evidence. I mean while the towers where still standing you can see molten metal dripping from the sides.

laws of physics can't be broken so why do you insist on trying to break them. you said free fall speed happens to anything that falls unless it has wind resistance??? what the hell does that mean? buildings can not hit free fall speeds without a controlled demolition that is a fact. that's the laws of physics based on how buildings are built...buildings are holding themselves up. there are computer applications that can track the roofline and caculate the speed at which the building collapsed to a very accurate degree. is not magic voodoo. I've been reasonable.