New to reddit? click here!
A subreddit devoted to the field of Future(s) Studies and evidence-based speculation about the development of humanity, technology, and civilization.
Posting Rules
- Be respectful to others - this includes no hostility, racism, sexism, bigotry, etc.
- Submissions must be future focused
- Images must be infographics, captioned galleries, or contained within a captioned self post
- No spamming
- Bots require moderator permission to operate
- Comments must contribute to the discussion and be of sufficient length
- Account age: >1 day to comment, >5 days to submit content
- Submissions and comments of accounts whose combined karma is too far in the negatives will be removed
- Avoid posting content that is a duplicate of content posted within the last 2-3 days.
- Submissions with [in-depth] in the title have stricter post length and quality guidelines
- Titles must accurately and truthfully represent the content of the submission
- Support original sources - avoid blogs/websites that are primarily rehosted content.
- Content older than 6 months must have [month, year] in the title.
For details on the rules see the
Rules Wiki.
For details on moderation procedures, see the
Transparency Wiki.
On Futurology
If history studies our past and social sciences study our present, what is the study of our future? Future(s) Studies (colloquially called "future(s)" by many of the field's practitioners) is an interdisciplinary field that seeks to hypothesize the possible, probable, preferable, or alternative future(s).
One of the fundamental assumptions in future(s) studies is that the future is plural rather than singular, that is, that it consists of alternative future(s) of varying degrees of likelihood but that it is impossible in principle to say with certainty which one will occur.
Recommended Links
Related Subreddits
For a list of related subreddits, hover over top menu.
Thanks to radd.it data services for the bots.
popular discussions today
science summaries
transparency
AMAs
domain blacklist
IRC
glossary
source quality
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]CjStaal 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]Midas_Stream 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]pocketknifeMT 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CjStaal 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Midas_Stream 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]hardolaf 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DS3_Toss_away [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]CjStaal -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Midas_Stream 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]JackSpyder -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Midas_Stream 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]JackSpyder -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Midas_Stream 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DS3_Toss_away [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]no_but_srsly_tho- 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)