46
47

Judge: Sandy Hook Shooter's Documents Must Stay Secret (nbcnews.com)

tito333 が 投稿

全 21 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Haizenberg 10ポイント11ポイント  (12子コメント)

I always love seeing pictures of Adam Lanza. They remind me of how easy it is to create a brand new person.

[–]tito333[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Just photoshop a freaky eyegaze.

[–]thing_on_a_string [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

H.P. Lovecraft.

[–]deanasaurs77 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (8子コメント)

How so?

[–]Vitalogy0107 10ポイント11ポイント  (7子コメント)

They're all conjured from the art of photoshop. Adam never existed, there is no proof he ever did. The complete story was make believe.

[–]Haizenberg 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

Exactly. /u/deanasaurs77, here's the proof.

[–]Vitalogy0107 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh and can't forget Wheeler's father also playing the role of a police officer in full gear holding a rifle by the stock, while accidentally pointing the barrel at the people behind him. No way a real officer would ever do that, but beyond that it's clearly the same actor as the father.

[–]Haizenberg 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I thought those were two different people...

Also, remember when Robbie Parker was laughing before pretending to cry during his speech? And the Wasiks abusing their daughter on camera?

[–]Vitalogy0107 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yep, you can also see him look down every 3 or so seconds to read off the cue cards. It's pretty sad.

[–]thing_on_a_string [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

holding a rifle

upside down by the magazine.

[–]megaman420 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5dyTee4loA

Supposed video of him playing dance dance rev, but it could be ANYONE.

Media can now be created and locations can be spiked with actors and complete staged to sell the public, politicians, etc on an "event" happening.

[–]thing_on_a_string [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

112lb six foot tall vegan.

off the scale BMI wise for an adult male, concentration camp starvation weight.

[–]captain_teeth33 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

'But there was no trial because Lanza killed himself after gunning down 20 first graders and six staffers with a .223-caliber Bushmaster Model XM15 assault rifle at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. He also murdered his mother. '

Faith in authority...

[–]tito333[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

There's no need to dig in, just perfectly normal secret.

[–]WolfgangJones 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

The specific documents in (FOIA) litigation here are a 5th grade assignment called the "Big Book of Granny" + a spreadsheet of earlier mass killings.

A LOT of other documents, crime scene photos and videos are allegedly available at http://cspsandyhookreport.ct.gov, but I've personally never taken the liberty to download them. Anybody else here?

[–]Vitalogy0107 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not from that specific website, but I have seen the video from the officer's squad cars, and it's very interesting that we can only see a few kids leaving the school when there should be hundreds, and that we see no blood in the school, just a few broken windows, and nothing corresponds correctly, at times we should be seeing hundreds of students walking to the fire station we can't see anyone, and it just is all too shady. I don't believe one single aspect of this story.

[–]thing_on_a_string [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

a spreadsheet of earlier mass killings.

was a big 'World of Tanks' poster, sold to or by the MSM as a serial killer spreadsheet. its clearly seen in the basement photos forensic photos.

[–]know_comment 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

The FOIA, Judge Carl Schuman wrote, does not apply to "documents that were private property before seizure by the police and that a court would ordinarily order returned to the rightful owner by the end of a criminal case."

this is interesting. should private property taken in an investigation be subject to FOIA request?

[–]tito333[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's pertinent to a state crime.

[–]know_comment [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I don't understand how FOIA requests work, but I was under the impression they applied to federal agency documents. Are we talking about the FBI or State police?

But in looking up FOIA, it looks like there are several exemptions, and a few of these are important to maintaining personal privacy.

Exemptions include:

  • trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential

  • personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy

Here is the applicable exemption:

  • records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual

but the question YOU'RE asking is whether this was a case of A, C or E.

I think though, that I would argue, considering the volume of potential "evidence" that is collected during the investigation of a case, that certain personal information should not be shared via FOIA request.