0
0

Are incels intellectually in the top 1%? (self.Truecels)

DasWeisseBand が 投稿

How else would you explain the rest of sheeple society not understanding that women are sociopaths unlike incels

全 29 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]TheKisslessVirgin 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know I'm not. Many of the incels I know are not exactly geniuses either.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]caamib -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm warning you.

    [–]dsar9012 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I forgot to mention my theory of why incels have, in my opinion, better philosophical analysis of society is pretty simple. Remember how farmers use basic genetic and eugenic knowledge to grow fatter cows and chickens and better crops? Well farmers can do that because they are alienated from their wildstock and vegetables they see them as economic investments. Humans refuse to use that same genetic knowledge to improve human genetics because they are not impartial to humanity and are quite illogical.

    Incels are alienated from society and can view society using logic as impartial observers because they are excluded they have no stake. That is why many incels have a far more "red pill" view of society than the normies who cannot be objective due to the fact that they play an active role in society. I mean imagine what aliens would think of human society if they were to travel here and analyze human culture impartially? Do you think they would have a positive view of humans and their social institutions? Of coarse not.

    [–][削除されました]  (3子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]fschmidt 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

      So the question is are all X's Y's, and you respond, no because you are Y but not X. Clearly you don't understand logic which means that you are not in the top 1% intellectually.

      [–]efurnit 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Actually, I'm a student majoring in mathematics, so I'm very well-aware that my example doesn't disprove the OP.

      I was just bringing it up to rub it in your faces.

      The thing is, only losers identify as incels, and people who are in the top 1% intellectually are almost never losers.

      [–]fschmidt 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Okay, so I will answer the OP for your benefit. Basically modern culture is sociopathic, both men and women. Those most likely to notice this are those who are the opposite of sociopaths, namely moral people. And it so happens (for evolutionary reasons) that moral people tend to be incel in modern culture. Intelligence also is a negative, but not as much as morality. An intelligent sociopath should not have problems dating in modern culture. And since you enjoy rubbing your dating success in the face of incels, you are most likely a sociopath, which explains your dating success.

      [–]dsar9012 -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

      Some of the greatest geniuses were incels like Isaac Newton, Beethoven, Tesla and probably others. While that doesn't prove incels are smarter than average it is interesting. I actually once heard a study found that every IQ point a male has over 100 can inversely increase their chances of being laid by 30. Don't remember what study that was though.

      [–]DudeNudem3 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Are you kidding? Beethoven was a world class womanizer.

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

      I don't find this convincing. Newton was likely gay and Tesla was really disturbed even for his time. I don't know about Beethoven's life. I think geniuses were unlikely to be incel before feminism.

      [–]WhiteCastleHo 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Whatever Tesla's deal was, he definitely wasn't an incel. Women were basically beating down his door.

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      I don't think he was incel but it seems he was volcel due to mental illness. Which makes sense, as most volcels are volcel due to mental illness, while most incels are incel due to lack of stupidity/immorality and develop illnesses like depression due to their incel, and aren't incel due to some mental issues.

      I, for example, stopped dating because I saw it's a bad way to do anything with modern Western skanks but could never be volcel. I just see that modern Western women are worthless and incapable of being good wives and mothers.

      [–]Bargh9 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (15子コメント)

      Not taking part in social life gives a person more opportunities think deeply. All the greatest philosophers were incels.

      [–]LazyLard128 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

      All the greatest philosophers were incels.

      top kek

      [–]efurnit 2ポイント3ポイント  (13子コメント)

      All the greatest philosophers were incels.

      Completely untrue.

      [–]caamib -1ポイント0ポイント  (12子コメント)

      Of course it's untrue, but you have to know the context. Incel was a rare occurrence before the advent of feminism.

      [–]somanyquestiones 0ポイント1ポイント  (9子コメント)

      And it is not rare today?

      [–]TheKisslessVirgin 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

      It's as common today as it was hundreds and thousands of years ago, very common for men.

      http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/17-to-1-reproductive-success

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Again, you're confusing incel with a lack of reproductive success. That's crazy. These men wouldn't be incel in everyday life like men here. They didn't reproduce for reasons I mentioned.

      More women reproduced because a man, if he survived, had somewhat less risk of dying than a woman who risked death in childbirth. So such men could have a succession of wives. Also, nobles and kings could have had little harems (informal ones in the West).

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

      It is not rare today, no. Even if you check these SJW subs that hate us you'll see a good number of them admit they're incel themselves.

      [–]somanyquestiones 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

      What do you think, how many % of the population are incel?

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

      It would depend on whether you mean guys who got nothing, guys who occasionally get something, guys who very rarely get something etc. You can widen it or narrow it, and in each case the percentage gets bigger or smaller.

      [–]somanyquestiones 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

      I would go with your definition of incel. So how many would that be?

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

      I'd say around 20 percent are incel at all time in just using my definition (6 months thing). But this, as I explained, doesn't include many poor men who enter a "relationship" once in a while just to see that modern Western women are unsuitable for them or have sex once in a while because they luck out on a dating site or whatever. They're also suffering a lot.

      I look at my friends - almost all our fathers were married at our age while only one guy in our group had been married.

      [–]somanyquestiones 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Could the fact, that men, from the generation of your father, were married at your age, just come from a rise of marriage age? And I know that you write often, that modern western women are not fit for a relationship, but what makes them unfit? And what is a real relationship to you?

      [–]TheKisslessVirgin 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Incel was a rare occurrence before the advent of feminism.

      No it wasn't. Incel was always common for men. Most men didn't reproduce.

      http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/17-to-1-reproductive-success

      [–]caamib 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Yes, but not due to incel but things like wars, diseases etc. In fact, in the past so many men would die in wars that it was extremely easy to find a wife, plus women weren't feminist bitches.